USRE36791E - Location system adapted for use in multipath environments - Google Patents

Location system adapted for use in multipath environments Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE36791E
USRE36791E US08/252,842 US25284294A USRE36791E US RE36791 E USRE36791 E US RE36791E US 25284294 A US25284294 A US 25284294A US RE36791 E USRE36791 E US RE36791E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
tag
transmissions
receiver
motion
toa
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US08/252,842
Inventor
Alan C. Heller
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Freshloc Technologies Inc
Precision Tracking FM Inc
Original Assignee
Precision Tracking FM Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=24065566&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=USRE36791(E) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Precision Tracking FM Inc filed Critical Precision Tracking FM Inc
Priority to US08/252,842 priority Critical patent/USRE36791E/en
Assigned to FRESHLOC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. reassignment FRESHLOC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SERVICE ID, INC.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE36791E publication Critical patent/USRE36791E/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S5/00Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations
    • G01S5/02Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations using radio waves
    • G01S5/06Position of source determined by co-ordinating a plurality of position lines defined by path-difference measurements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S5/00Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations
    • G01S5/02Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations using radio waves
    • G01S5/0295Proximity-based methods, e.g. position inferred from reception of particular signals
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06KGRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K7/00Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
    • G06K7/0008General problems related to the reading of electronic memory record carriers, independent of its reading method, e.g. power transfer
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C9/00Individual registration on entry or exit
    • G07C9/20Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass
    • G07C9/28Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass the pass enabling tracking or indicating presence

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to position location systems, and more particularly relates to a radiolocation system adapted for use in an environment subject to multipath effects.
  • the invention relates to such a system that accomplishes position location using either (a) time-of-arrival differentiation for radiolocation transmissions received at multiple receivers (high resolution), or (b) area-detection using receivers that receive radiolocation transmissions from assigned areas (low resolution).
  • Position or object location systems are finding increasing application in manufacturing and materials handling environments.
  • such systems have utility for factory automation, including such applications as tool automation, process control, robotics, autonomous guided vehicles, computer-integrated-manufacturing (CIM), and just-in-time (JIT) inventory control.
  • CCM computer-integrated-manufacturing
  • JIT just-in-time
  • Tag transmissions can be effected by radio, ultrasonic or optical communications, using various techniques for identifying object movement or location in the near range of a receiver.
  • Radio communication provides a high degree of accuracy and performance superior to ultrasonics and optics in terms of: (a) range per watt of power; and (b) penetrability through opaque structures.
  • a problem with radio communications in the typical business environment--which includes walls, silvered windows and other fixed structures-- is that, for the frequencies of interest (i.e., above 100 MHz), random reflections introduce multipath distortions in tag transmissions arriving at a given receiver.
  • the unpredictable attenuation of transmissions passing through walls and other structures makes signal strength only marginally useful for communicating distance/location information.
  • the invention is a location system adapted for use in environments subject to multipath effects, implementing object location by (a) time-of-arrival differentiation using tag transmissions received at multiple receivers (high resolution embodiment), or (b) area-detection using receivers that receive tag transmissions from an assigned area (low resolution embodiment).
  • high resolution embodiment time-of-arrival differentiation using tag transmissions received at multiple receivers
  • low resolution embodiment area-detection using receivers that receive tag transmissions from an assigned area
  • a radiolocation system can be implemented with spread spectrum communications for unlicensed operations.
  • the location system includes, for each object to be located within a tracking area, a TAG transmitter that transmits, at selected intervals, TAG transmissions including at least a unique TAG ID.
  • An array of receivers is distributed within the tracking area.
  • the array of receivers is distributed such that TAG transmissions from a given TAG transmitter located anywhere in the tracking area are received by at least three receivers (for two dimensional tracking).
  • Each receiver includes a time-of-arrival circuit and a data communications controller.
  • the time-of-arrival circuit triggers in response to the arrival of a direct-path TAG transmission, providing a time-of-arrival TOA-COUNT synchronized to a system synchronization clock available at each receiver.
  • the data communications controller is responsive to the triggering of the time-of-arrival circuit for providing a corresponding TOA-DETECTION packet including at least the TAG ID from the TAG transmission and the TOA COUNT.
  • a location processor receives TOA-DETECTION packets communicated from each receiver, and determines the location of a TAG (and its associated object) from at least three TOA-DETECTION packets corresponding to the TAG transmissions for that TAG received by different receivers.
  • each receiver of the array is assigned a specific location-area, such that it receives TAG transmissions almost exclusively from TAGs located in that area.
  • Implementing a radiolocation system based on receiver-assigned areas can be accomplished in various ways, such as by using directional antennas at the receivers, or by cooperatively selecting receiver spacing and TAG transmitter power so that TAG transmissions are received by the most proximate receiver.
  • Each receiver includes a data communications controller.
  • the data communications controller in each receiver is responsive to the receipt of a TAG transmission for providing a corresponding AREA-DETECTION packet including at least the TAG ID from the TAG transmission.
  • a location processor receives AREA-DETECTION packets from each receiver, and determines the location of each object based on the respective receiver that received the TAG transmissions to which it is most proximate.
  • each TAG transmitter includes a spread spectrum transmitter that outputs TX-packets, including at least the TAG ID, according to a spread spectrum data communications protocol.
  • the TAG transmitters operate at a predetermined power level.
  • Each radiolocation receiver includes a spread spectrum receiver that receives the spread spectrum TAG transmission, recovers the TAG ID, and outputs an RX-packet that includes the TAG ID.
  • a data communications controller at each receiver is responsive to the RX-packet to provide a DETECTION-packet, including at least the TAG ID, for communication to a location processor.
  • the location processor receives DATA-packets from each receiver, and determines object location.
  • the exemplary high-resolution embodiment of a radiolocation system is used to locate objects such as wafer boxes in a semiconductor manufacturing facility.
  • An array of radiolocation receivers is coupled to a radiolocation system processor over a LAN (local area network).
  • LAN local area network
  • Each TAG transmitter includes, in addition to a spread spectrum transmitter, a motion detect circuit and a periodicity control circuit.
  • the TAG transmitter is enabled for transmission only while object motion is detected by the motion detector. While the object is in motion, the TAG transmitter transmits at regular intervals determined by the periodicity control.
  • Each TAG transmission includes a motion status (Initiated, Continuing, Stopped) in addition to TAG ID.
  • the TAG can include means for entering other information (by an operator or otherwise) for communication to the system processor.
  • Each radiolocation receiver includes, in addition to a spread spectrum receiver, a TOA trigger circuit, a time base latching circuit and a programmable controller.
  • the TOA trigger circuit triggers within the early cycles of the arrival of a TAG transmission, providing a TOA DETECT trigger.
  • the time base latching circuit is responsive to the TOA DETECT trigger to latch the time base TOA COUNT from an 800 MHz time base counter, which is synchronized to a 200 MHz system synchronization clock provided by the system processor over the LAN.
  • the programmable controller receives the TAG ID and motion status recovered by the spread spectrum receiver and the TOA COUNT from the time base latching circuit, and provides a TOA-DETECTION packet communicated over the LAN to the system processor.
  • the time-of-arrival detection circuitry in the receiver provides adjustable noise sensitivity for differentiating between TAG transmissions and random pulsed noise.
  • the TOA trigger circuit provides the TOA-DETECT trigger when the input signal level exceeds an adjustable signal-level threshold, while the time base latching circuit signals that a valid TAG transmission has been received when the duration of the TOA-DETECT trigger exceeds a programmable signal duration threshold.
  • the location system is adaptable to use in a multipath environment, such as found in manufacturing and other business facilities, where the reception of direct-path transmissions is affected by the presence of multipath noise.
  • Object location can be accomplished by either a high resolution approach using time-of-arrival differentiation, or a low resolution (low cost) approach using area detection by receivers configured to detect TAG transmissions from an assigned area.
  • Using unlicensed, commercially available spread spectrum equipment facilitates discrimination between the direct-path transmissions of interest and multipath noise.
  • each TAG transmitter can include a motion detector, with TAG transmission being limited to (or concentrated in) intervals when an object is being moved.
  • TAG transmissions can include, in addition to TAG ID, motion status and other information input by an operator or otherwise.
  • TOA-DETECTION triggering and time base TOA COUNT latching can be separated from the spread spectrum communications function to permit the use of commercially available spread spectrum equipment.
  • a high-speed TOA triggering circuit provides TOA-DETECTION triggering within the early cycles of the arrival of a TAG transmission.
  • a time base latching circuit using a synchronized time base counter operating in the range of 800 MHz provides resolution on the order of 10 feet.
  • Noise filtering optimizes time-of-arrival detection for TAG transmissions, providing adjustable signal-level and signal-duration thresholds to minimize the effects of random pulsed noise.
  • FIG. 1a illustrates a semiconductor fabrication facility as an environment containing walls and other fixed structures that cause multipath reflections.
  • FIG. 1b illustrates an exemplary array of receivers for the radiolocation system of the invention, together with a fixed array of calibration transmitters.
  • FIGS. 2a-2c are functional block diagrams of a TAG transmitter, a radiolocation receiver (with time-of-arrival detection) and the LAN interface for the radiolocation system;
  • FIG. 3 diagrammatically illustrates the position location processing operation for the high resolution embodiment of the radiolocation system using time-of-arrival differentiation for object location;
  • FIGS. 4a-4c functionally illustrates a spread spectrum communication system (transmitter and receiver) for use in the radiolocation system
  • FIGS. 5a-5b schematically illustrate the time-of-arrival circuitry for the high resolution embodiment, with FIG. 5a illustrating the receiver front and the TOA detect circuit, and FIG. 5b illustrating the time base latching circuit.
  • Radiolocation System--TOA Detection the radiolocation system is used to track and locate objects (such as wafer boxes) in in automated semiconductor fabrication facility.
  • the radiolocation system is configured for high-resolution object location (on the order of 10 feet or less) using time-of-arrival differentiation and an 800 MHz synchronized time base clock.
  • FIG. 1a illustrates a semiconductor fabrication facility 10 with numerous segregated areas, such as GaAs Lithography Photolithography 12, GaAs Etch 13, Metalization 14 and Ion Implant 15, each enclosed by partitions or walls, including walls 16, 17 and 18.
  • GaAs Lithography Photolithography 12 GaAs Etch 13, Metalization 14 and Ion Implant 15
  • partitions or walls including walls 16, 17 and 18.
  • FIG. 1b illustrates the fabrication facility 10 showing only the walls 16, 17 and 18. Located within the facility (in or adjacent to the ceiling) is an array of radiolocation receivers 20, including individual receivers 22, 24 and 26.
  • Attached to each object to be tracked is a TAG transmitter.
  • Each TAG transmitter associated with an object transmits TAG transmissions that are received by the receiver array.
  • the TAG transmissions from a TAG transmitter located at 30 are received by, at least, radiolocation receivers 22, 24 and 26.
  • Each TAG transmission is a TX-packet that includes a TAG ID uniquely identifying each TAG (i.e., each object).
  • TAG transmitters 35 In addition to TAG transmitters on each object, a number of fixed-position TAG transmitters 35 are located around the facility. These TAG transmitters, which have a known position with respect to each receiver, are used for system calibration.
  • Each radiolocation receiver in the receiver array 20 receives TAG transmissions, and accurately detects time-of-arrival using an 800 MHz time base counter. For each TX-packet in a TAG transmission, the receiver generates corresponding TOA-DETECTION packets, which are communicated over a LAN (local area network) to a radiolocation system processor 40.
  • LAN local area network
  • System processor 40 performs all object-location computations. In addition, the system processor 40 generates a 200 MHz system synchronization clock 42 from which the 800 MHz time base count in each receiver is derived. System processor 40 is coupled through a LAN interface 44 to the network, which is used for data communications between the system processor and the receiver array, and for providing the 200 MHz system synchronization clock.
  • the system processor includes object-tracking database storage, with user access to the object location information being provided by a graphics workstation through a graphical user interface.
  • TAG transmissions between TAGs (objects) and the receiver array are implemented using spread spectrum communications in the 902-928 MHz band.
  • radio transmissions in that frequency band are subject to multipath reflections.
  • Using spread spectrum communications for the TAG transmissions is advantageous in separating direct-path transmissions from multipath reflections (see, Section 2).
  • FIG. 2a is a functional block diagram of a TAG transmitter 50, which includes:
  • a periodicity control circuit 58 for controlling the re-transmission interval of the spread spectrum transmitter.
  • the TX-packet in each periodic TAG transmission includes not only the appropriate TAG ID, but also one of three motion status indications: Motion Initiated, Motion Continuing and Motion Stopped.
  • each spread spectrum transmitter S2 is normally in a power-saver mode, being enabled for transmission by battery saving circuit 54 only while its associated object is being moved to a new location.
  • Object motion is detected by motion detector 56, which provides an appropriate indication to the battery saving circuit.
  • battery saving circuit 54 In response to a motion indication, battery saving circuit 54 initiates a transmit mode by enabling spread spectrum transmitter 52 for an initial TAG transmission.
  • the TX-packet in this initial TAG transmission includes, in addition to the TAG ID, a Motion Initiated status.
  • periodicity control 58 causes spread spectrum transmitter 52 to re-transmit TAG transmissions at selected intervals (such as every 15 seconds).
  • the TX-packets in these periodic TAG re-transmissions include, in addition to the TAG ID, a Motion Continuing status.
  • motion detector 56 stops providing an object motion indication to battery saving circuit 54.
  • the battery saving circuit disables periodicity control 58, and causes the spread spectrum transmitter to transmit a final TAG transmission with a TX-packet including a Motion Stopped status.
  • the TAG transmitter remains in the non-transmitting power-saver mode until the next movement of the object.
  • the TAG transmitters could be programmed to transmit a low duty cycle TAG transmission that provides a No Motion status indication.
  • the TAG transmissions propagate through the facility, and are received by the receiver array. Because these transmissions must propagate through partitions, walls and other obstructions that introduce unpredictable levels of attenuation, signal strength at the receivers does not provide any useful information from which object location can be deduced. Moreover, these obstructions introduce multipath reflections that are also received by the receivers, albeit after the arrival of the direct-path transmission.
  • TAG transmissions arrive at the various receivers with a time-of-arrival differential that depends upon the corresponding time-of-arrival (or path-length) differential between multiple receivers and the TAG transmitter (object), and is substantially unaffected by signal-attenuating obstructions in the path of the TAG transmission.
  • this time-of-arrival differential can be used to determine object location with a high level of resolution if each receiver provides reliable and accurate time-of-arrival detection for a received TAG transmission.
  • TOA detection requires: (a) reliable triggering on the time-of-arrival for the direct-path TAG transmission; and (b) a stable synchronized time base.
  • TOA triggering must be independent of the strength of the TAG transmission signal (which is subject to attenuation in the path between the object and a given receiver). Failure to trigger independent of signal strength, also known as dispersion delay, introduces time-of-arrival triggering disparities depending upon direct-path attenuation.
  • the radiolocation system processor 40 provides a 200 MHz system synchronization clock over the LAN to each of the receivers in the array 20.
  • the 200 MHz system clock is converted by conventional phase coherent frequency multiplication to an 800 MHz TOA time base clock that is synchronized with all other receivers.
  • This approach to providing a time base for time-of-arrival detection enables the receivers to be synchronized to within about 1.25 nanoseconds, thereby allowing location resolution through TOA differentiation to within about two feet.
  • the selection of a 200 MHz system synchronization clock with up-conversion at each receiver to the desired 800 MHz time base clock is a design choice resulting from the selection of a specific LAN data communication system for providing the system synchronization clock (see, Section 1.3).
  • the radiolocation system of the invention is readily adaptable to other schemes for providing a system synchronization clock for deriving an appropriate receiver time base for the desired location resolution.
  • FIG. 2b is a functional block diagram of a radiolocation receiver 60, which includes:
  • a receiver front end 62 for amplifying and conditioning the received TAG transmission (TX-packet);
  • a TOA detect trigger 64 for detecting the arrival of the direct path TAG transmission and providing a TOA DETECT indication
  • a time base latching circuit 65 for latching, in response to a TOA DETECT indication, the associated time base TOA COUNT of the synchronized 800 MHz time base counter;
  • a spread spectrum receiver 66 for receiving the TX-packet from each TAG transmission, and generating an RX-packet including the TAG ID and the motion status;
  • a programmable controller 68 for assembling the latched TOA COUNT from the time base latching circuit, along with the recovered TAG ID and motion status, into a TOA-DETECTION packet;
  • a power supply provides both TTL, ECL and radio circuitry power.
  • Receiver front end 62 receives each TAG transmission, and performs conventional amplification and filtering.
  • a received TAG transmission is applied to TOA trigger 64 for time-of-arrival triggering--the TOA trigger provides a TOA DETECT indication within the early cycles of the TAG transmission.
  • the rapid detection of a triggering event is achievable with a high speed comparator using conventional peak energy detection in the TOA trigger.
  • TOA DETECT is provided to time basellatching circuit 65 as an indication of the arrival of a TAG transmission wavefront.
  • the time base latching circuit latches the associated time base count of the 800 MHz time base clock (up-converted from the 200 MHz system synchronization clock).
  • the time base latching circuit performs digital noise filtering to attempt to ensure that a TOA DETECT indication from TOA trigger 64 is associated with a spread spectrum TAG transmission rather than random pulsed noise.
  • time base latching circuit 65 When time base latching circuit 65 indicates the arrival of a TAG transmission, the associated TX-packet is applied to spread spectrum receiver 66.
  • the spread spectrum receiver extracts the TAG ID and motion status from the TX-packet, and outputs an RX-packet that includes TAG ID and motion status.
  • programmed controller 68 For each TAG transmission, programmed controller 68 retrieves the latched time base count from time base latching circuit 65, along with the RX-packet from spread spectrum receiver 66. The programmed controller assembles this time-of-arrival information (TAG ID, motion status and time base TOA COUNT) into a TOA-DETECTION packet for communication over the LAN to the radiolocation system processor.
  • TAG ID time-of-arrival information
  • motion status and time base TOA COUNT time base TOA COUNT
  • each radiolocation receiver detects changing time-of-arrival measurements for the associated TAG transmissions.
  • the time-of-arrival detection operation at each receiver differentiates between the arrival of the direct-path TAG transmission and the subsequently-arriving multipath reflection signals, triggering on the arrival of the early cycles of the direct-path TAG transmission prior to the confluence of the multipath components.
  • each receiver can be considered an element of a space diverse antenna, facilitating the rejection of multipath noise.
  • the TOA-DETECTION packet assembled by the programmed controller is communicated to the radiolocation system processor over the LAN.
  • each receiver in the radiolocation receiver array is coupled over a LAN to radiolocation system processor 40 (the LAN cabling is not shown).
  • System processor 40 continuously receives TOA-DETECTION packets (TAG ID, motion status and time base TOA COUNT) from each of the receivers as they detect TAG transmissions.
  • the receivers are coupled to the system processor for two independent communications operations: (a) data communication; and (b) receiver time base synchronization (providing repeatability to within a few hundreds of picoseconds).
  • the exemplary embodiment implements these two communications operations using a single coaxial-cable based ARCNET local area network.
  • the ARCNET LAN uses a token passing protocol and a data transmission rate of 2.5 Mbits per second. Communication is over standard RG62 coaxial cable that will accommodate signal frequencies of up to 200 MHz without significant attenuation problems. Thus, the 200 MHz system synchronization clock can be multiplexed onto the normal ARCNET data communications traffic without any significant degradation.
  • FIG. 2c is a functional block diagram illustrating the LAN interface at the radiolocation system processor and the receivers.
  • a LAN interface 81 includes an ARCNET interface (RIM) card 82 and a 200 MHz clock interface.
  • RIM ARCNET interface
  • a diplex filter 84 multiplexes the 200 MHz system synchronization clock 83 onto the 2.5 MHz ARCNET signal, and outputs the resulting LAN signal onto the network as normal ARCNET packet traffic.
  • a LAN interface 86 includes a diplex filter 87 that demultiplexes the LAN signal to recover the 200 MHz system synchronization clock.
  • the ARCNET packet is provided to an ARCNET interface (RIM) card 88, while the 200 MHz clock is provided through a clock interface 89 to the time base latching circuit (not shown).
  • RIM ARCNET interface
  • Selecting a data communications network is largely a design choice.
  • the performance requirements for the data communications operation are not particularly demanding, and could be met by a number of alternative schemes such as telephone, microwave or radio.
  • the synchronization operation is less adaptable, being constrained by the requirement of maintaining synchronization between receivers to within a few hundreds of picoseconds--failure to maintain this synchronization equates to a loss of positional accuracy.
  • the radiolocation system processor receives TOA-DETECTION packets communicated over the LAN from the receivers (data acquisition), and processes the time-of-arrival data to obtain position location information (data reduction).
  • FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating the position location processing operation.
  • the system processor For each received TOA-DETECTION packet (TAG ID, time base TOA COUNT, and motion status), the system processor identifies (82) the TAG (object) being moved. This operation recovers the TAG ID from a TOA-DETECTION packet, where possible, and attempts to reconcile those TOA-DETECTION packets for which the TAG ID can not be extracted. For example, multipath noise received by a receiver might prevent the receiver from recovering the TAG ID for the transmitting TAG transmitter, although the TOA data may be accurate independent of the reasons a TAG identification can not be made.
  • All TOA-DETECTION packets are checked (83) for valid TAG ID. Those TOA-DETECTION packets without a valid TAG ID that nevertheless arrive within a given time period, such as 1000 nanoseconds, are assigned (84) to the same TAG transmitter. Receiver redundancy, including a combination of valid TOA-DETECTION packets (i.e., valid TAG ID) and assigned TOA-DETECTION packets, enables the data reduction algorithm to determine the validity, or invalidity, of any of the assigned TOA-DETECTION.
  • the time-of-arrival data for that TAG transmitter is processed (85) using conventional differential time-of-arrival algorithms to obtain object position information.
  • object position can be computed (87) using the receiver ID and time-of-arrival data (three-dimensional tracking would require at least four TOA measurements).
  • Additional TOA-DETECTION packets represent redundant position location information that can also be used (88) by the object location algorithms.
  • the position location information computed from the received TOA packets is conventionally stored (92) in a fully indexed object tracking database that includes: (a) TAG ID (16 bits); (b) motion status; (c) object location; (d) location qualification vector; and (e) time.
  • Motion status is stored as a 4-bit quantity (sixteen combinations) that, in the exemplary embodiment indicates Motion Initiated, Motion Continuing or Motion Stopped.
  • additional status information that could be communicated and stored include: (a) a No Motion status, transmitted at selected intervals while an object is stationary to provide an updated record of the active TAG transmitters whether or not moving, and to assist in identifying TAG transmitter failures; and (b) the status of membrane-type key depressions on the TAG transmitter (such as an operator-initiated alert), allowing key-type status to be passed to the system processor directly from the TAG transmitter or from automatic sources (such as an automatic guided vehicle).
  • Object location is stored in 32-bit longitude and latitude quantities.
  • the location qualification vector represents an error radial based on the build-up of approximation calculations, TOA triggering randomness, synchronization randomness and other factors diminishing the accuracy of position location computation (to around ten feet).
  • the object tracking database can be queried (94) through a graphical user interface (95) using conventional database look-up and retrieval software.
  • a mapping database retrieval software package is recommended to permit location coordinates for any object to be posted on a map of the facility.
  • the mapping database retrieval software can post to a facility map locations of a particular item, group of items, location over time, flow of items through a point in space or various combinations of such information.
  • the radiolocation system includes calibration transmitters 35. These transmitters are installed at fixed, predetermined locations, such as by mounting at or in the ceiling of the facility in the same manner as the radiolocation receivers 20.
  • the number and location of calibration transmitters 50 is determined principally by the need to ensure that each of the receivers in array 20 is able to receive the calibration transmission of at least three calibration transmitters.
  • each receiver receives additional calibration transmissions provides calibration redundancy to accommodate communication errors (such as loss of calibration transmitter ID). If the calibration transmitters are co-located with the receivers, the differential time-of-arrival processing of TAG transmissions from the calibration transmitters could be used to generate a survey of the receiver array.
  • the calibration transmitters are programmed to transmit calibration signals at predetermined intervals, such as every 100 seconds. Each calibration transmission includes the associated calibration transmitter ID.
  • calibration transmissions are received by the radiolocation receivers, which detect time-of-arrival in the same manner as TAG transmissions.
  • the receivers transmit calibration data packets (calibration transmitter ID and TOA COUNT) to system processor 40 over the LAN.
  • System processor 40 receives the calibration packets and computes the locations of the calibration transmitters from the time-of-arrival data using the same procedures as used in object tracking.
  • the computed positions for each calibration transmitter, and the associated differential time-of-arrival values for the receivers, are compared to the known positions and associated differential time-of-arrival values for those transmitters--apparent positional and TOA differences are converted into new calibration coefficients for each receiver.
  • updated calibration coefficients are stored in the object-location database, and used to adjust the time-of-arrival data provided by each receiver in the course of normal object tracking operations.
  • Radiolocation System--Area Detection As a low cost alternative to the high resolution embodiment of the radiolocation system using differential time-of-arrival, the radiolocation system of the invention can be implemented as a low resolution embodiment using receivers configured to detect TAG transmissions only from respective assigned areas. This embodiment differs from the high resolution embodiment described in Section 1 in two principal respects:
  • object-location resolution is determined by the size of assigned receiver areas rather than time-of-arrival differentiation
  • receivers only receive TAG transmissions from TAGs transmitting within respective assigned areas, so that object location is effected when a receiver receives a TAG transmission with the TAG ID.
  • the low resolution embodiment offers significant cost savings by eliminating the need for time-of-arrival detection (TOA triggering and time base latching).
  • the receivers of the radiolocation array 20 would be configured to detect TAG transmissions from TAGs located within respective object-location areas of a predetermined size (providing a predetermined object-location resolution).
  • directional antennas could be used at selected receiver locations, with the size of the object-location area being determined by the predetermined antenna beamwidth.
  • selecting receiver location is flexible, subject to providing coverage for an assigned object-location area.
  • the receivers could be distributed in a grid, with the size of the object-location area being determined by the predetermined spacing between receivers.
  • object location resolution is a function of receiver spacing, with TAG transmitter power being cooperatively selected so that a TAG transmission is received by the most proximate receiver (in this configuration, receipt of a TAG transmission by more than one receiver represents a loss of object location resolution).
  • the TAG transmitter 50 can be implemented as described in Sections 1.1 and 4 for the high resolution radiolocation embodiment.
  • the TAG transmitter can include a spread spectrum transmitter 52 that transmits TAG transmissions only when TAG (object) motion is detected using battery saving circuit 54 and motion detector 56, with periodic re-transmissions during object motion as determined by periodicity control 58.
  • TAG transmission power will be relatively low to limit range, and therefore, the likelihood that a TAG transmission will be received by more than one receiver.
  • TAG transmission power might be in a range of 0.01 to 1 watt (see Section 3), while for the low power embodiment, TAG transmission power might be around one microwatt to provide an effective range of around 10 meters.
  • the radiolocation receiver 60 can be significantly reduced in complexity and cost by eliminating those components associated with time-of-arrival detection.
  • the only circuits that need be included are the spread spectrum receiver 66 and the programmed controller 68, although some type of receiver front end will probably be required to provide amplification and filtering.
  • the TOA trigger circuit 64 and the time base latching circuit 65 are no longer required to support time-of-arrival detection.
  • the programmable controller need not be programmed to control these circuits.
  • the spread spectrum receiver would operate as described in Section 3, receiving a TAG transmission from the receiver front end and recovering the TAG ID and motion status from the TX-packet, outputting an RX-packet with the recovered TAG ID and motion status.
  • the RX-packet would be retrieved by the programmed controller.
  • the programmed controller would generate a corresponding AREA-DETECTION packet including TAG ID and motion status.
  • the AREA-DETECTION packet would be communicated over the LAN to the radiolocation system processor.
  • the radiolocation system processor would receive AREA-DETECTION packets from the receivers of the radiolocation array, and perform object-location processing to update the object location database.
  • object location for a TAG need not be computed, but only recorded based on the receipt of AREA-DETECTION packets including the TAG ID from the receiver assigned to the area in which the TAG (object) is located.
  • the radiolocation system uses spread spectrum communications under the FCC Part 15.247 regulations for unlicensed operations in the 902-928 MHz band.
  • spread spectrum communications is advantageous in differentiating direct-path TAG transmissions from the associated multipath noise, and in enabling low power operations (the maximum allowed transmitter power under Part 15.247 is one watt).
  • Spread spectrum transmission involves constant frequency shifts, sometimes referred to as "frequency hopping".
  • the frequency shifts result in different angles of reflection on rough reflective surfaces, causing the multipath reflections to break into frequency components fluctuating in space.
  • Using spread spectrum communications enables low power TAG transmitters (less than one watt) to achieve relatively long range operation by transmitting in short bursts at high peak power levels. Achieving high peak transmission power is important for the high resolution embodiment of the radiolocation system because it reduces the number of receivers required to ensure that a TAG transmission is received by at least three receivers (and usually more for the sake of redundancy).
  • the pulsed operation that characterizes spread spectrum communications requires noncoherent data reception. That is, unlike coherent data communications where a receiver is able to lock onto a carrier signal for demodulation, a spread spectrum receiver must acquire a synchronization lock with the incoming TAG transmission rapidly enough to ensure that the TAG ID data included in the TX-packet can be recovered.
  • a significant advantage of using spread spectrum communications to obtain short transmission pulses and noncoherent data reception is that battery usage is significantly lowered, albeit at the expense of some degree of data integrity or bit error rate (BER). For example, one error in 10 5 is typical for noncoherent receiver design, while one in 10 9 is typical in coherent receiver design.
  • BER bit error rate
  • a higher error rate is tolerable because: (a) data reception is usually redundant due to receiver overlap (i.e., typically more than three receivers receive a given TAG transmission); and (b) time-of-arrival detection does not always require that a particular TAG ID be properly received since the system processor can often determine that the triggering event occurred and is associated with the TAG ID received at other receivers.
  • Radiolocation system uses a commercially available system, SPREADEX--Short Range Spread Spectrum Wireless Control, Telemetry and Data Radio Communication System, available from Hillier Technologies Limited Partnership.
  • This spread spectrum system is described in Appendix A (Transmitter) and Appendix B (Receiver), and in the related U.S. Pat., the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
  • FIG. 4a is a functional block diagram of the SPREADEX spread spectrum communication system.
  • the spread spectrum system includes a transmitter 100 (incorporated into each TAG transmitter) and a receiver 110 (incorporated into each receiver in the receiver array).
  • Spread spectrum transmitter 100 includes a control module 102 that generates the receiver master clock (using a standard digital logic crystal oscillator frequency of about 2 MHz), and provides power control, control data and operation sequencing.
  • a spreader 103 implements an appropriate spreading (chipping) sequence to produce a spread spectrum TX-packet (TAG transmission).
  • the TX-packet is applied to a modulator 104 that includes shaping circuitry and a varactor diode modulating a temperature stabilized oscillator.
  • the output of the modulator is a shaped frequency-shift-keyed signal.
  • a final transmitter RF stage 106 provides amplification as appropriate for the selected power level (typically between 0.01 watts and the legal limit of 1 watt), together with output filtering to assure compliance with the FCC regulations on out-of-band emissions.
  • the resulting TAG transmission is broadcast from antenna 108 (either on-board or external).
  • FIG. 4b shows the format of a TX-packet. It includes a preamble, a sync bit, a 16-bit TAG ID field and a 16-bit data field consisting, in the exemplary embodiment, of 12 filler bits and 4 status (data) bits.
  • This TAG transmission packet is spread in spreader 103 by combining the packet bits with the appropriate chipping sequence.
  • the chip clock is about 1 MHz (one half the spread spectrum transmitter crystal oscillator clock frequency), and a packet is transmitted in 619 microseconds (619 chip clock cycles), of which the first 128 microseconds are used to transmit the preamble and sync bits (i.e., prior to the TAG ID and data fields).
  • the packet bits (including synchronization) are transmitted at about 60 Kbps, while the actual data bits are transmitted at about 52 Kbps.
  • spread spectrum receiver 110 includes, in addition to an antenna 112, three major stages: receiver RF front end 114, receiver IF demodulator 115 and a despreader 116.
  • Receiver front end 114 includes a preamplifier and mixer to convert the incoming TAG transmission signal into a typical 45 MHz intermediate frequency (IF) signal. The signal is then passed to the receiver IF demodulator 115, a Motorola 13055 IF processor integrated circuit which performs demodulation.
  • IF intermediate frequency
  • the demodulated signal is applied to despreader 116 for despreading with a digital matched filter using analog summing and comparison.
  • Synchronization for despreading is provided by a 2 MHz crystal oscillator 118, which should be at the same frequency as the clock in spread spectrum transmitter 100 plus or minus 400ppm to ensure acquiring synchronization lock.
  • the spread spectrum receiver must acquire synchronization lock to be able to recover TAG ID and status data. That is, for each TX-packet, spread spectrum receiver 110 has about 128 microseconds to acquire synchronization lock (i.e., the time allocated to the preamble and sync bits) prior to the arrival of the TAG ID and status data. If synchronization lock on the TX-packet is acquired, the TAG ID and status data are recovered, and an RX-packet is generated.
  • synchronization lock i.e., the time allocated to the preamble and sync bits
  • a design goal is to attempt to minimize the number of times a signal that is actually random pulsed noise rather than a TAG transmission is applied to the spread spectrum receiver--see Section 5.2.
  • FIG. 4c shows the format of a RX-packet. It includes a preamble, a sync bit, and 32 data bits.
  • the 32-bit data field includes a 16-bit TAG ID and a 2-bit motion status (in the exemplary embodiment, the other 14 bits are reserved).
  • Each RX-packet generated by spread spectrum receiver 110 in response to a TAG transmission is retrieved by the programmed controller (68 in FIG. 2b) in the radiolocation receiver, and used to assemble a corresponding TOA-DETECTION packet.
  • the specific implementation of a spread spectrum communication system forms no part of the present invention.
  • a principal reason for selecting the SPREADEX system is that it is available as separate transmitter/receiver components, as well as a combined transceiver. Since the transmitter component is significantly less complex (and therefore, less expensive) than the receiver component, and since the number of TAG transmitters will typically greatly exceed the number of receivers in the radiolocation array (even in the case of the low resolution embodiment), then using just a transmitter for the TAG transmitter component greatly reduces the cost of configuring a radiolocation system.
  • a TAG transmitter 50 performs three basic functions: (a) spread spectrum communication with TAG transmissions; (b) motion detection to enable TAG transmission; and (c) periodicity control to establish TAG transmission intervals.
  • Spread spectrum transmitter 52 is described in Section 2 and Appendix A, and in the related patent.
  • the unique 16-bit TAG ID is provided in an address selection operation by etching or scratching 16 diode connections on the spread spectrum transmitter card.
  • Spread spectrum transmitter 52 is responsive to start-transmission inputs TX1 and TX2 to initiate a spread spectrum TAG transmission when either strobe line transitions active--TX1 is provided by battery saving circuit 54 and TX1 is provided by periodicity control 58. Both of these start-transmission inputs are inactive during a power-saver mode. For each TAG transmission, the spread spectrum transmitter provides a TXENABLE output that signals the end of the TX-packet transmission.
  • Spread spectrum transmitter 52 also receives two motion status (data) inputs STAT1 and STAT2--STAT1 is provided by battery saving circuit 54, and STAT2 is provided by periodicity control 58. Both of these STAT inputs are inactive when the TAG transmitter is in the power-saver mode (indicating no motion).
  • Battery saving circuit 54 is a conventional multivibrator that triggers in response to each motion (jitter) indication from motion detector 56, driving its TX1/STAT1 output line active.
  • the reset period for the multivibrator is made adjustable, using a potentiometer 54a, within a range of 1 to 60 seconds--the adjustable reset period is selected such that, during object motion, the multivibrator is continually re-triggered before the expiration of the reset period, maintaining TX1/STAT1 active. That is, the reset period establishes the length of time after object motion ceases (as indicated by the last jitter signal from the motion detector) that spread spectrum transmitter 52 will continue periodic TAG re-transmissions.
  • Motion detector 56 is a conventional mercury tilt (jitter) switch that provides a motion indication signal to battery saving circuit 54 each time motion is detected.
  • the motion detector is sensitive enough that even steady movement of an object, such as on a conveyor belt, will generally cause motion indications.
  • Periodicity control 58 is a conventional multivibrator that triggers in response to TXENABLE (end-of-TAG transmission) from spread spectrum transmitter 52, causing TX2/STAT2 to transition active.
  • the multivibrator is reset, and TX2/STAT2 transitions inactive, after a reset period that is adjustable, using a potentiometer 58a, within a range of 1 to 60 seconds--the reset period establishes the length of time after a TAG transmission (as indicated by TXENABLE) that the periodicity control circuit will output a TX2 start-transmission strobe to spread spectrum transmitter 52, initiating a re-transmission.
  • battery saving circuit 54 responds to an initial motion indication from motion detector 56 to provide a TX1/STAT1 strobe, causing a TAG transmission with a Motion Initiated status.
  • motion detector 56 provides motion (jitter) indications, continuously retriggering the multivibrator in batter saving circuit 54, so that TX1/STAT1 remains active.
  • the TXENABLE strobe from spread spectrum transmitter 52 triggers the multivibrator in periodicity control 58, which is then reset after the predetermined reset period to provide a TX2/STAT2 strobe. This action initiates periodic TAG re-transmissions with a Motion Continuing status.
  • motion detector 56 stops providing motion indications to trigger the multivibrator in battery saving circuit 54.
  • the multivibrator is reset, and the battery saving circuit switches TX1/STAT1 inactive, and at the same time, provides a reset strobe to periodicity control 58. This action immediately resets the multivibrator, causing a TX2/STAT2 strobe to initiate one last TAG transmission with a Motion Stopped status.
  • battery savings circuit 54 and periodicity control 58 are implemented together with a dual multivibrator integrated circuit package No. 79HC123. Potentiometer adjustments can be set based on the expected object motion and the number of TAG transmitters (objects) within transmission range of each other. Typically, a TAG transmitter will be set to retrigger every 15 seconds, and after object movement ceases, will continue to transmit 30 more seconds. The IC package typically uses under 10 microamps when the TAG transmitter is in the power-saver mode.
  • the duration of a TAG transmission (619 microseconds) is short for a radio device. If the TAG transmitters could be synchronized, then over 1,000 tags could transmit per second. Because the TAG transmitters are not synchronized, they behave in random bursts for which conventional statistical analysis can be used to minimize collisions by adjustment of periodicity for the given TAG population.
  • Randomness of the periodic TAG transmissions is achieved as a result of two factors.
  • the initiation of motion is based upon mechanical motion, which is a random event in the context of the radiolocation system--even if multiple objects are moved together (such as by a conveyor belt), the objects are not moved in synchronicity within a synchronization window of about a millisecond window.
  • the potentiometers can be used to add random periodicity.
  • the multivibrators in the battery savings and periodicity control circuit typically have a decay time subject to a Schmitt trigger voltage level that may vary from part to part by over 1 volt.
  • the periodicity introduced by the periodicity control circuits will vary sufficiently to introduce a significant degree of randomness.
  • each receiver of the array 20 performs four basic functions: (a) receiving spread spectrum communications; (b) triggering at the time-of-arrival of a TAG transmission; (c) latching the time base TOA COUNT of the 800 MHz synchronization counter in response to a TOA trigger; and (d) outputting onto the LAN TOA-DETECTION packets which include the time-of-arrival data for each TAG transmission.
  • the highly stable 800 MHz time base clock (1.25 nanoseconds per cycle) provides an ideal distance resolution of about one foot.
  • TAG transmissions are received by the receiver front end 62 (ANT PORT), and applied immediately to TOA trigger 64.
  • the TOA trigger circuit provides a TOA trigger (TOA DETECT) to time base latching circuit 65.
  • the time base latching circuit latches the time base count of the 800 MHz time base clock, derived from the 200 MHz synchronization clock (200 MIN).
  • the time base latching circuit performs digital noise filtering to attempt to ensure that the TOA trigger circuit is triggered by a TAG transmission rather than random pulsed noise--if a valid TAG transmission is indicated, the time base latching circuit enables (SSOUTEN) receiver front end 62 to provide the TX-packet to spread spectrum receiver 66 (SSOUT/SSIN).
  • FIG. 5a is a schematic diagram of a receiver front end 120.
  • the receiver front end receives the spread spectrum TAG transmission through antenna port 121 (ANT PORT in FIG. 2a).
  • the radio signal is amplified in two stages by amplifiers 122 and 123, with filtering by helical filters 124 and 125.
  • the TAG transmission signal propagates through the receiver front end with some amount of propagation delay.
  • the received TAG transmission is passed to a power splitter 126 that divides the radio signal for input (a) through a solid state switch 128, to the spread spectrum receiver (66 in FIG. 2a), and (b) to a TOA trigger circuit 130 (64 in FIG. 2a).
  • the receiver front end does not provide the TX-packet of the TAG transmission to the spread spectrum receiver until the solid state switch is enabled by SSOUTEN from the time base latch circuit (65 in FIG. 2a).
  • spread spectrum receiver 66 is described in Section 2 and Appendix B, and in the related patent.
  • the receiver does not receive TX-packets from receiver front end 62 (SSOUT/SSIN) until time base latching circuit 65 decides that the received radio signal is a TAG transmission rather than random pulsed noise and provides SSOUTEN--this delay correspondingly reduces the 128 microsecond window for acquiring synchronization lock (see Sections 3 and 5.2).
  • receiver 66 Once receiver 66 has acquired synchronization lock, it provides an ACQLK signal, and proceeds to recover TAG ID and motion status from the TX-packet. The receiver then assembles a corresponding RX-packet (including TAG ID and motion status), switching RRDY active when the RX-packet is available at the serial port RSO for retrieval by the programmed controller.
  • Programmed controller 68 responds to RRDY active by providing an RSCLK clock signal to clock the RX-packet out of the RSO serial port.
  • TOA Trigger Circuit 64 is located on the same card as receiver front end 62, with mechanical separation being provided for signal isolation.
  • TOA triggering is accomplished without using mixing to obtain a down-converted intermediated frequency. While down-conversion would reduce the sensitivity required for the TOA trigger circuit, it would also reduce trigger accuracy by the period of the intermediate frequency. That is, phase differences between the transmitter oscillator and the receiver local oscillator can cause errors of up to a full IF period, leading to amplified inaccuracies.
  • FIG. 5a is a schematic diagram of a TOA trigger circuit 130.
  • the TOA trigger circuit is a conventional peak-hold design--the TAG transmission signal is passed through a diode 132 to a signal-level-threshold capacitor 133, which maintains charge as a function of the highest, most recent signal.
  • the TOA trigger function is provided by a high speed comparator 135, which receives the TAG transmission signal and a programmable signal-level reference voltage from digital potentiometer 136.
  • the digital potentiometer is set by a signal INCPOT from the programmed controller (see FIG. 2a).
  • Comparator 135 is selected for high speed and minimal dispersion characteristics, such as an FFD 96687 BQ. By minimizing dispersion, comparator output responds at the same or similar rate when driven by high power (comparator overdrive) or low power signals.
  • the comparator reference voltage is adjusted by programmable potentiometer 136 to provide a predetermined signal-level threshold.
  • comparator 135 Upon receipt of a signal from receiver front end 120 (through power splitter 126) that exceeds the signal-level threshold set by the comparator reference voltage from potentiometer 136, comparator 135 triggers rapidly, asserting a TOA DETECT trigger signal.
  • the TOA DETECT trigger is provided to the time base latching circuit (65 in FIG. 2a) as a possible indication of the arrival of a TAG transmission--at this point, the asserted TOA DETECT trigger may indicate a TAG transmission or random pulsed noise.
  • TOA DETECT remains asserted as long as the input signal remains above the comparator reference voltage--when the signal disappears beneath that predetermined signal-level threshold, either at the end of the TAG transmission or the end of the random pulsed noise, detector capacitor 133 decays, causing comparator 135 to switch and deassert TOA DETECT. Based on the length of time that the TOA DETECT trigger remains asserted, the time base latching circuit decides whether to-treat it as a TAG transmission. 5.2 Time-Base Latching Circuit. Referring to FIG.
  • time base latching circuit receives, in addition to the TOA DETECT trigger from TOA trigger circuit 64, the 200 MHz system synchronization clock from LAN interface 69 (200 MIN), and ACQLK from spread spectrum receiver 66 (indicating that the receiver has achieved the synchronism necessary for data recovery).
  • Time base latching circuit is a high-speed statusizing latch circuit that performs both time base latching and digital filtering, while minimizing metastability problems associated with asynchronous latching.
  • the circuit is configured from both high-speed ECL and TTL register sections. These registers are written and read by programmed controller 68 using REGSEL and R/-W to select a register and the type of operation, with data/parameter transfer over REGDATA.
  • FIG. 5b illustrates the register configuration 140 of a time base latching circuit.
  • the registers are used for either time base latching or digital filtering operations. All registers are coupled to a Control Bus over which they may be read and/or written.
  • the time base latching operation is implemented using the following register designations:
  • the TIME BASE register is an 800 MHz time base counter (non-readable) that is clocked by an 800 MHz time base clock--this clock is derived from the 200 MHz system synchronization clock provided by the radiolocation system processor by conventional phase coherent frequency multiplication.
  • the TOA DETECT trigger is asserted, indicating the arrival of a signal that could be a TAG transmission, the time base TOA COUNT in the TIME BASE register is immediately latched into the TOA LATCH register.
  • the most significant bit of the TIME BASE register is a time base overflow TIME BASE OV that outputs an interrupt onto the Control Bus--this overflow indication is latched in a STATUS register and read by the programmable controller, which maintains a total overflow count.
  • the 32-bit counter counts for about 21 milliseconds before overflow.
  • the TOA LATCH register receives a paralleled input from the TIME BASE register, and latches the time base TOA COUNT in that register when the TOA DETECT trigger is asserted.
  • the TOA LATCH register minimizes the problem of digital latching metastability, which results from the occurrence of an asynchronous triggering event (TOA DETECT) during a window of time that the TIME BASE counter is incrementing.
  • Such a statusizing arrangement will typically use a Johnson (or Gray code) counter as the high frequency (least significant) section(s) of the 800 MHz TIME BASE counter, reducing the number of bits in transition.
  • the TOA LATCH register is read section-by-section over the Control Bus by the programmed controller when the time base latching circuit has determined, in a digital filtering function, that the TOA DETECT trigger represents the arrival of a TAG transmission.
  • the digital filtering function is implemented using the following control and writable register designations:
  • registers are configured in sections using TTL logic.
  • the digital filtering function defines three states of the radiolocation receiver:
  • the time base latching circuit When the time base latching circuit recognizes a received signal as a TAG transmission, and invokes the DISARMED state, the circuit provides (a) SSOUTEN to enable transfer of the TAG transmission (TX-packet) to the spread spectrum receiver, and (b) an interrupt to notify the programmed controller that a TAG transmission has been received and the latched time base TOA COUNT is available to be read from the TOA LATCH.
  • REARMing the radiolocation receiver i.e., the time base latching circuit
  • the programmed controller provides the REARM command over the Control Bus to a flip-flop 142 that controls the TOA LATCH.
  • the contents of the TOA LATCH register are valid when the radiolocation receiver is put in the DISARMED state. That is, when TOA DETECT is asserted for long enough to indicate a valid TX-packet, the resulting interrupt notifies the programmed controller that the TOA LATCH register contains the time base TOA COUNT.
  • the radiolocation receiver is REARMed to ARMED1 either (a) from DISARMED when a valid TX-packet is detected and the least significant register sections of TOA LATCH are read, or (b) from ARMED2 when TOA DETECT is deasserted before MAX NOISE LENGTH, indicating the receipt of invalid noise.
  • the MAX NOISE LENGTH register is settable by the programmed controller with a value that determines the transition from the ARMED2 to the DISARMED states. That is, this register is loaded with a predetermined signal-duration threshold parameter, typically around one microsecond, that defines the duration threshold at which a received signal that causes assertion of the TOA DETECT trigger is deemed to be a TAG transmission rather than random pulsed noise.
  • the signal-duration threshold parameter in MAX NOISE LENGTH is used to control TOA detection sensitivity.
  • the spread spectrum receiver (which does not receive the TX-packet until SSOUTEN is provided after MAX NOISE LENGTH is reached) will not have enough of the 128 microsecond preamble window in which to acquire a synchronization lock (ACQLK must be achieved to recover the TAG ID).
  • TOA TO ACQLK is a 1 MHz 16-bit counter that measures the time between the receipt by the time base latching circuit of (a) the TOA DETECT trigger from the TOA trigger circuit, and (b) the ACQLK signal from the spread spectrum receiver.
  • This register is used for two operations: (a) in conjunction with the MAX NOISE LENGTH register, signalling that a count of MAX NOISE LENGTH has elapsed since assertion of the TOA DETECT trigger; and (b) indicating the elapsed time after the TOA DETECT trigger for the spread spectrum receiver to achieve ACQLK (a value that can be used by the programmed controller to adjust the MAX NOISE LENGTH parameter).
  • a comparator 144 triggers to cause a transition in flip-flop 142 (DISARM/REARM). If TOA DETECT is still asserted at this time, the DISARM state is invoked, indicating a valid TAG transmission. An interrupt notifies the programmed controller that the TOA LATCH contains a valid time base TOA COUNT, which is read by the programmed controller after the TOA DETECT trigger is deasserted indicating the end of the TAG transmission.
  • the TOA DETECT LENGTH register is a 10 MHz 24-bit counter that measures the lapsed count during which TOA DETECT remains asserted, i.e., for the duration of the TX-packet, and is valid only in the DISARMED state. This register is resolved to approximately one microsecond, and can count beyond 619 (the standard TX-packet being 619 microseconds in duration). It can be used for confirmation that a TOA DETECT trigger that remains asserted beyond MAX NOISE LENGTH is, in fact, a valid TX-packet.
  • the NOISE COUNTER register provides a count of assertions of the TOA DETECT trigger since the last REARMing (i.e., since the last TOA DETECT trigger was asserted for longer than MAX NOISE LENGTH, and the associated time base TOA COUNT was read from the TOA LATCH), thereby providing a count of the number of TOA DETECT triggers that are discarded as being attributable to random pulsed noise rather than a TAG transmission. This count is used by programmed controller 68 to adjust the two noise-sensitivity thresholds--the comparator reference voltage and MAX NOISE LENGTH--to minimize TOA DETECT triggering off random pulsed noise.
  • the effect of the digital filtering function is to delay applying a received signal to the spread spectrum receiver until after the TOA DETECT trigger is asserted for longer than a predetermined (programmable) count of MAX NOISE LENGTH, thereby indicating that the received signal is a TAG transmission rather than random pulsed noise.
  • This digital filtering function minimizes lock-up of the spread spectrum receiver on non-TX-packets.
  • Selecting the MAX NOISE LENGTH parameter depends on how fast the spread spectrum receiver can acquire synchronization lock, and the prevalence in the receiver environment of random pulsed noise.
  • signal-level filtering is provided by selecting the comparator reference level for triggering the comparator in the TOA detector circuit (using INCPOT from the programmed controller).
  • MAX NOISE LENGTH can be lengthened to exclude these noise signals.
  • the comparator reference level can be increased by incrementing INCPOT to remove these interfering signals. Care must be taken against setting this comparator reference level so high as to prevent the TOA detector circuit from regularly asserting the TOA DETECT trigger for attenuated but valid TX-packets.
  • a recommended design approach is to maximize MAX NOISE LENGTH (maximize the signal duration threshold), and minimize the INCPOT setting for the comparator reference voltage (minimize the signal-level threshold).
  • programmable controller 68 is a commercially available, configurable system from INTEL (WILDCARD). It is small in size and has a relatively high density motherboard permitting the use of other peripherals.
  • the CPU is an Intel 8088 with standard interface logic.
  • the system comes with the following other components: (a) 256K RAM for program store; (b) 32K ROM for driver program with down-line loader; (c) peripheral controller based upon the Intel 8255; and (d) Arcnet interface.
  • the programmed controller When configured, the programmed controller is equivalent to a diskless, networked processor, standard in the industry for local area networks.
  • the peripheral controller interfaces to (a) time base latching circuit 65 for reading and writing registers including retrieving the time base TOA COUNT from the TOA LATCH register, (b) spread spectrum receiver 66 for retrieving RX-packets (with TAG ID and motion status), and (c) TOA trigger 64 for setting the comparator reference level provided by the programmable potentiometer (136 in FIG. 5a).
  • programmed controller 68 performs the following functions:
  • the programmed controller awaits a MAX NOISE LENGTH interrupt from the time base latching circuit--a TOA DETECT trigger (ARMED2) followed by a timeout of the MAX NOISE LENGTH counter (DISARMED)--indicating that a valid TX-packet has been received.
  • ARMED2 TOA DETECT trigger
  • DISARMED timeout of the MAX NOISE LENGTH counter
  • programmed controller 68 On receiving the MAX NOISE LENGTH interrupt, programmed controller 68 awaits deassertion of the TOA DETECT trigger (which indicates that receipt of the TAG transmission is complete), and then reads the TOA LATCH register to retrieve the time base count for the TX-packet. For statistical reasons, prior to reading the least significant register sections of the TOA LATCH, thereby effecting REARM, the programmed controller may also read the other registers of the time base latching circuit, which are still valid prior REARM. ##SPC1##

Abstract

A radiolocation system for multipath environments, such as for tracking objects in a semiconductor fabrication facility (FIGS. 1a-1b), includes an array of receivers (20) distributed within the tracking area, coupled to a system processor (40) over a LAN. A TAG transmitter (30) located with each object transmits, at selected intervals, spread spectrum TAG transmissions including at least a unique TAG ID. In a high resolution embodiment, object location is accomplished by time-of-arrival (TOA) differentiation, with each receiver (FIG. 2b) including a TOA trigger circuit (64) for triggering on arrival of a TAG transmission, and a time base latching circuit (65) for latching the TOA count from an 800 MHz time base counter. In a low resolution embodiment, each receiver of the array is assigned a specific location-area, and receives TAG transmissions almost exclusively from TAGs located in that area, thereby eliminating the need for any time-of-arrival circuitry.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates generally to position location systems, and more particularly relates to a radiolocation system adapted for use in an environment subject to multipath effects. In even greater particularity, the invention relates to such a system that accomplishes position location using either (a) time-of-arrival differentiation for radiolocation transmissions received at multiple receivers (high resolution), or (b) area-detection using receivers that receive radiolocation transmissions from assigned areas (low resolution).
RELATED PATENT
This patent incorporates by reference the subject matter of U.S. Pat. No. 4,864,588, titled Remote Control System, Components and Methods, which is assigned to Hillier Technologies Limited Partnership.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Position or object location systems are finding increasing application in manufacturing and materials handling environments. For example, such systems have utility for factory automation, including such applications as tool automation, process control, robotics, autonomous guided vehicles, computer-integrated-manufacturing (CIM), and just-in-time (JIT) inventory control.
One approach to position location systems uses transmitters, or tags, attached to objects to be tracked, and an array of receivers for receiving tag transmissions throughout a tracking area. Tag transmissions can be effected by radio, ultrasonic or optical communications, using various techniques for identifying object movement or location in the near range of a receiver.
Radio communication provides a high degree of accuracy and performance superior to ultrasonics and optics in terms of: (a) range per watt of power; and (b) penetrability through opaque structures. However, a problem with radio communications in the typical business environment--which includes walls, silvered windows and other fixed structures--is that, for the frequencies of interest (i.e., above 100 MHz), random reflections introduce multipath distortions in tag transmissions arriving at a given receiver. Moreover, in such an environment, the unpredictable attenuation of transmissions passing through walls and other structures makes signal strength only marginally useful for communicating distance/location information.
Accordingly, a need exists for a position location system capable of being used to locate objects in an environment subject to the effects of multipath reflections.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention is a location system adapted for use in environments subject to multipath effects, implementing object location by (a) time-of-arrival differentiation using tag transmissions received at multiple receivers (high resolution embodiment), or (b) area-detection using receivers that receive tag transmissions from an assigned area (low resolution embodiment). In either the high resolution or low resolution embodiment, a radiolocation system can be implemented with spread spectrum communications for unlicensed operations.
In one aspect of the invention, the location system includes, for each object to be located within a tracking area, a TAG transmitter that transmits, at selected intervals, TAG transmissions including at least a unique TAG ID. An array of receivers is distributed within the tracking area.
For a high resolution embodiment, the array of receivers is distributed such that TAG transmissions from a given TAG transmitter located anywhere in the tracking area are received by at least three receivers (for two dimensional tracking).
Each receiver includes a time-of-arrival circuit and a data communications controller. The time-of-arrival circuit triggers in response to the arrival of a direct-path TAG transmission, providing a time-of-arrival TOA-COUNT synchronized to a system synchronization clock available at each receiver. The data communications controller is responsive to the triggering of the time-of-arrival circuit for providing a corresponding TOA-DETECTION packet including at least the TAG ID from the TAG transmission and the TOA COUNT.
A location processor receives TOA-DETECTION packets communicated from each receiver, and determines the location of a TAG (and its associated object) from at least three TOA-DETECTION packets corresponding to the TAG transmissions for that TAG received by different receivers.
For a low resolution embodiment, each receiver of the array is assigned a specific location-area, such that it receives TAG transmissions almost exclusively from TAGs located in that area. Implementing a radiolocation system based on receiver-assigned areas can be accomplished in various ways, such as by using directional antennas at the receivers, or by cooperatively selecting receiver spacing and TAG transmitter power so that TAG transmissions are received by the most proximate receiver.
Each receiver includes a data communications controller. The data communications controller in each receiver is responsive to the receipt of a TAG transmission for providing a corresponding AREA-DETECTION packet including at least the TAG ID from the TAG transmission.
A location processor receives AREA-DETECTION packets from each receiver, and determines the location of each object based on the respective receiver that received the TAG transmissions to which it is most proximate.
The location system can be implemented using spread spectrum radio communications, which allows unlicensed operations. In this aspect of the invention, each TAG transmitter includes a spread spectrum transmitter that outputs TX-packets, including at least the TAG ID, according to a spread spectrum data communications protocol. The TAG transmitters operate at a predetermined power level. Each radiolocation receiver includes a spread spectrum receiver that receives the spread spectrum TAG transmission, recovers the TAG ID, and outputs an RX-packet that includes the TAG ID.
A data communications controller at each receiver is responsive to the RX-packet to provide a DETECTION-packet, including at least the TAG ID, for communication to a location processor. The location processor receives DATA-packets from each receiver, and determines object location.
In more specific aspects of the invention, the exemplary high-resolution embodiment of a radiolocation system is used to locate objects such as wafer boxes in a semiconductor manufacturing facility. An array of radiolocation receivers is coupled to a radiolocation system processor over a LAN (local area network).
Each TAG transmitter includes, in addition to a spread spectrum transmitter, a motion detect circuit and a periodicity control circuit. The TAG transmitter is enabled for transmission only while object motion is detected by the motion detector. While the object is in motion, the TAG transmitter transmits at regular intervals determined by the periodicity control. Each TAG transmission includes a motion status (Initiated, Continuing, Stopped) in addition to TAG ID. In addition, the TAG can include means for entering other information (by an operator or otherwise) for communication to the system processor.
Each radiolocation receiver includes, in addition to a spread spectrum receiver, a TOA trigger circuit, a time base latching circuit and a programmable controller. The TOA trigger circuit triggers within the early cycles of the arrival of a TAG transmission, providing a TOA DETECT trigger. The time base latching circuit is responsive to the TOA DETECT trigger to latch the time base TOA COUNT from an 800 MHz time base counter, which is synchronized to a 200 MHz system synchronization clock provided by the system processor over the LAN. The programmable controller receives the TAG ID and motion status recovered by the spread spectrum receiver and the TOA COUNT from the time base latching circuit, and provides a TOA-DETECTION packet communicated over the LAN to the system processor.
The time-of-arrival detection circuitry in the receiver provides adjustable noise sensitivity for differentiating between TAG transmissions and random pulsed noise. The TOA trigger circuit provides the TOA-DETECT trigger when the input signal level exceeds an adjustable signal-level threshold, while the time base latching circuit signals that a valid TAG transmission has been received when the duration of the TOA-DETECT trigger exceeds a programmable signal duration threshold.
The technical advantages of the invention include the following. The location system is adaptable to use in a multipath environment, such as found in manufacturing and other business facilities, where the reception of direct-path transmissions is affected by the presence of multipath noise. Object location can be accomplished by either a high resolution approach using time-of-arrival differentiation, or a low resolution (low cost) approach using area detection by receivers configured to detect TAG transmissions from an assigned area. Using unlicensed, commercially available spread spectrum equipment facilitates discrimination between the direct-path transmissions of interest and multipath noise.
To conserve power, each TAG transmitter can include a motion detector, with TAG transmission being limited to (or concentrated in) intervals when an object is being moved. TAG transmissions can include, in addition to TAG ID, motion status and other information input by an operator or otherwise.
For the high resolution embodiment, TOA-DETECTION triggering and time base TOA COUNT latching can be separated from the spread spectrum communications function to permit the use of commercially available spread spectrum equipment. A high-speed TOA triggering circuit provides TOA-DETECTION triggering within the early cycles of the arrival of a TAG transmission. A time base latching circuit using a synchronized time base counter operating in the range of 800 MHz provides resolution on the order of 10 feet. Noise filtering optimizes time-of-arrival detection for TAG transmissions, providing adjustable signal-level and signal-duration thresholds to minimize the effects of random pulsed noise.
For a more complete understanding of the invention, and for further features and advantages, reference is now made to the following Detailed Description of an exemplary embodiment of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings. Although the Detailed Description, and the Drawings, are with respect to a specific, exemplary embodiment of the invention, various changes and modifications may be suggested to one skilled in the art, and it is intended that the invention encompass such changes and modifications as fall within the scope of the appended Claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1a illustrates a semiconductor fabrication facility as an environment containing walls and other fixed structures that cause multipath reflections.
FIG. 1b illustrates an exemplary array of receivers for the radiolocation system of the invention, together with a fixed array of calibration transmitters.
FIGS. 2a-2c are functional block diagrams of a TAG transmitter, a radiolocation receiver (with time-of-arrival detection) and the LAN interface for the radiolocation system;
FIG. 3 diagrammatically illustrates the position location processing operation for the high resolution embodiment of the radiolocation system using time-of-arrival differentiation for object location;
FIGS. 4a-4c functionally illustrates a spread spectrum communication system (transmitter and receiver) for use in the radiolocation system; and
FIGS. 5a-5b schematically illustrate the time-of-arrival circuitry for the high resolution embodiment, with FIG. 5a illustrating the receiver front and the TOA detect circuit, and FIG. 5b illustrating the time base latching circuit.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The Detailed Description of exemplary embodiments of the radiolocation system of the invention, adapted for use in multipath environments, is organized as follows:
1. Radiolocation System--TOA Detection
1.1. TAG Transmission
1.2. Reception and TOA Detection
1.3. LAN Communications
1.4. Position Location Processing
1.5. Calibration
2. Radiolocation System--Area Detection
3. Spread Spectrum Communication
4. TAG Transmitter
5. Radiolocation Receiver
5.1. TOA Trigger Circuit
5.2. Time-Base Latch Circuit
5.2. Programmable Controller
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
This Detailed Description incorporates by reference the subject matter of U.S. Pat. No. 4,864,588, titled Remote Control System, Components and Methods, and assigned to Hillier Technologies Limited Partnership, together with any divisionals of that patent.
1. Radiolocation System--TOA Detection. In the exemplary embodiment, the radiolocation system is used to track and locate objects (such as wafer boxes) in in automated semiconductor fabrication facility. The radiolocation system is configured for high-resolution object location (on the order of 10 feet or less) using time-of-arrival differentiation and an 800 MHz synchronized time base clock.
FIG. 1a illustrates a semiconductor fabrication facility 10 with numerous segregated areas, such as GaAs Lithography Photolithography 12, GaAs Etch 13, Metalization 14 and Ion Implant 15, each enclosed by partitions or walls, including walls 16, 17 and 18.
FIG. 1b illustrates the fabrication facility 10 showing only the walls 16, 17 and 18. Located within the facility (in or adjacent to the ceiling) is an array of radiolocation receivers 20, including individual receivers 22, 24 and 26.
Numerous objects move within the facility, such as wafer boxes transported on conveyor systems. These objects must be tracked, and their location identified, to implement efficient automated fabrication operations.
Attached to each object to be tracked is a TAG transmitter. Each TAG transmitter associated with an object transmits TAG transmissions that are received by the receiver array. For example, the TAG transmissions from a TAG transmitter located at 30 are received by, at least, radiolocation receivers 22, 24 and 26. Each TAG transmission is a TX-packet that includes a TAG ID uniquely identifying each TAG (i.e., each object).
In addition to TAG transmitters on each object, a number of fixed-position TAG transmitters 35 are located around the facility. These TAG transmitters, which have a known position with respect to each receiver, are used for system calibration.
Each radiolocation receiver in the receiver array 20 receives TAG transmissions, and accurately detects time-of-arrival using an 800 MHz time base counter. For each TX-packet in a TAG transmission, the receiver generates corresponding TOA-DETECTION packets, which are communicated over a LAN (local area network) to a radiolocation system processor 40.
System processor 40 performs all object-location computations. In addition, the system processor 40 generates a 200 MHz system synchronization clock 42 from which the 800 MHz time base count in each receiver is derived. System processor 40 is coupled through a LAN interface 44 to the network, which is used for data communications between the system processor and the receiver array, and for providing the 200 MHz system synchronization clock.
The system processor includes object-tracking database storage, with user access to the object location information being provided by a graphics workstation through a graphical user interface.
1.1. TAG Transmission. TAG transmissions between TAGs (objects) and the receiver array are implemented using spread spectrum communications in the 902-928 MHz band. In the environment illustrated in FIG. 1, radio transmissions in that frequency band are subject to multipath reflections. Using spread spectrum communications for the TAG transmissions is advantageous in separating direct-path transmissions from multipath reflections (see, Section 2).
FIG. 2a is a functional block diagram of a TAG transmitter 50, which includes:
(a) a spread spectrum transmitter 52 for transmitting spread spectrum TAG transmissions (TX-packets);
(b) a battery saving circuit 54 for enabling the spread spectrum transmitter when the TAG (object) is being moved; and
(c) a motion detection circuit 56 for detecting TAG (object) motion; and
(d) a periodicity control circuit 58 for controlling the re-transmission interval of the spread spectrum transmitter.
For the exemplary embodiment, the TX-packet in each periodic TAG transmission includes not only the appropriate TAG ID, but also one of three motion status indications: Motion Initiated, Motion Continuing and Motion Stopped.
To conserve power and to increase the available population of TAG transmitters, each spread spectrum transmitter S2 is normally in a power-saver mode, being enabled for transmission by battery saving circuit 54 only while its associated object is being moved to a new location. Object motion is detected by motion detector 56, which provides an appropriate indication to the battery saving circuit.
In response to a motion indication, battery saving circuit 54 initiates a transmit mode by enabling spread spectrum transmitter 52 for an initial TAG transmission. The TX-packet in this initial TAG transmission includes, in addition to the TAG ID, a Motion Initiated status.
While the object remains in motion (as detected by motion detector 56), periodicity control 58 causes spread spectrum transmitter 52 to re-transmit TAG transmissions at selected intervals (such as every 15 seconds). The TX-packets in these periodic TAG re-transmissions include, in addition to the TAG ID, a Motion Continuing status.
When the object arrives at its new location and becomes stationary, motion detector 56 stops providing an object motion indication to battery saving circuit 54. After a predetermined period in which the object is stationary (such as 30 seconds), the battery saving circuit disables periodicity control 58, and causes the spread spectrum transmitter to transmit a final TAG transmission with a TX-packet including a Motion Stopped status.
The TAG transmitter remains in the non-transmitting power-saver mode until the next movement of the object. As an alternative to completely disabling TAG transmissions while an object is stationary, during such stationary times, the TAG transmitters could be programmed to transmit a low duty cycle TAG transmission that provides a No Motion status indication.
The TAG transmissions propagate through the facility, and are received by the receiver array. Because these transmissions must propagate through partitions, walls and other obstructions that introduce unpredictable levels of attenuation, signal strength at the receivers does not provide any useful information from which object location can be deduced. Moreover, these obstructions introduce multipath reflections that are also received by the receivers, albeit after the arrival of the direct-path transmission.
1.2. Reception and TOA Detection. TAG transmissions arrive at the various receivers with a time-of-arrival differential that depends upon the corresponding time-of-arrival (or path-length) differential between multiple receivers and the TAG transmitter (object), and is substantially unaffected by signal-attenuating obstructions in the path of the TAG transmission.
To implement a high resolution embodiment of the radiolocation system, this time-of-arrival differential can be used to determine object location with a high level of resolution if each receiver provides reliable and accurate time-of-arrival detection for a received TAG transmission. TOA detection requires: (a) reliable triggering on the time-of-arrival for the direct-path TAG transmission; and (b) a stable synchronized time base.
Failure to consistently and accurately trigger on arrival of the early cycles of the direct-path TAG transmission (which will arrive before any associated multipath reflections)--despite random changes in temperature, humidity and/or circuit performance--causes reliability problems that translate into errors in TOA detection, and therefore, location computation. However, even if TOA triggering is accurate, failure to achieve a stable synchronized time base (or knowledge of relative time differences) reduces the accuracy of time-of-arrival detection based on TOA triggering.
In addition, TOA triggering must be independent of the strength of the TAG transmission signal (which is subject to attenuation in the path between the object and a given receiver). Failure to trigger independent of signal strength, also known as dispersion delay, introduces time-of-arrival triggering disparities depending upon direct-path attenuation.
For the exemplary embodiment, the radiolocation system processor 40 provides a 200 MHz system synchronization clock over the LAN to each of the receivers in the array 20. At each receiver, the 200 MHz system clock is converted by conventional phase coherent frequency multiplication to an 800 MHz TOA time base clock that is synchronized with all other receivers. This approach to providing a time base for time-of-arrival detection enables the receivers to be synchronized to within about 1.25 nanoseconds, thereby allowing location resolution through TOA differentiation to within about two feet.
The selection of a 200 MHz system synchronization clock with up-conversion at each receiver to the desired 800 MHz time base clock is a design choice resulting from the selection of a specific LAN data communication system for providing the system synchronization clock (see, Section 1.3). The radiolocation system of the invention is readily adaptable to other schemes for providing a system synchronization clock for deriving an appropriate receiver time base for the desired location resolution.
FIG. 2b is a functional block diagram of a radiolocation receiver 60, which includes:
(a) a receiver front end 62 for amplifying and conditioning the received TAG transmission (TX-packet);
(b) a TOA detect trigger 64 for detecting the arrival of the direct path TAG transmission and providing a TOA DETECT indication;
(c) a time base latching circuit 65 for latching, in response to a TOA DETECT indication, the associated time base TOA COUNT of the synchronized 800 MHz time base counter;
(d) a spread spectrum receiver 66 for receiving the TX-packet from each TAG transmission, and generating an RX-packet including the TAG ID and the motion status;
(e) a programmable controller 68 for assembling the latched TOA COUNT from the time base latching circuit, along with the recovered TAG ID and motion status, into a TOA-DETECTION packet; and
(f) a network interface 69 for interfacing the communication of TOA-DETECTION packets over the LAN.
In addition, a power supply provides both TTL, ECL and radio circuitry power.
Receiver front end 62 receives each TAG transmission, and performs conventional amplification and filtering.
A received TAG transmission is applied to TOA trigger 64 for time-of-arrival triggering--the TOA trigger provides a TOA DETECT indication within the early cycles of the TAG transmission. The rapid detection of a triggering event is achievable with a high speed comparator using conventional peak energy detection in the TOA trigger.
TOA DETECT is provided to time basellatching circuit 65 as an indication of the arrival of a TAG transmission wavefront. The time base latching circuit latches the associated time base count of the 800 MHz time base clock (up-converted from the 200 MHz system synchronization clock). In addition, the time base latching circuit performs digital noise filtering to attempt to ensure that a TOA DETECT indication from TOA trigger 64 is associated with a spread spectrum TAG transmission rather than random pulsed noise.
When time base latching circuit 65 indicates the arrival of a TAG transmission, the associated TX-packet is applied to spread spectrum receiver 66. The spread spectrum receiver extracts the TAG ID and motion status from the TX-packet, and outputs an RX-packet that includes TAG ID and motion status.
For each TAG transmission, programmed controller 68 retrieves the latched time base count from time base latching circuit 65, along with the RX-packet from spread spectrum receiver 66. The programmed controller assembles this time-of-arrival information (TAG ID, motion status and time base TOA COUNT) into a TOA-DETECTION packet for communication over the LAN to the radiolocation system processor.
As an object moves from one location to another, farther from some receivers, closer to others, each radiolocation receiver detects changing time-of-arrival measurements for the associated TAG transmissions. For a given TAG transmission, the time-of-arrival detection operation at each receiver differentiates between the arrival of the direct-path TAG transmission and the subsequently-arriving multipath reflection signals, triggering on the arrival of the early cycles of the direct-path TAG transmission prior to the confluence of the multipath components.
The ability to receive a valid TAG ID despite multipath effects is enhanced by the space diversity inherent in spread spectrum communications (see, Section 2). Effectively, each receiver can be considered an element of a space diverse antenna, facilitating the rejection of multipath noise.
After TOA detection of a received direct-path TAG transmission, the TOA-DETECTION packet assembled by the programmed controller is communicated to the radiolocation system processor over the LAN.
1.3. LAN Communications. Referring to FIG. 1b, each receiver in the radiolocation receiver array is coupled over a LAN to radiolocation system processor 40 (the LAN cabling is not shown). System processor 40 continuously receives TOA-DETECTION packets (TAG ID, motion status and time base TOA COUNT) from each of the receivers as they detect TAG transmissions.
The receivers are coupled to the system processor for two independent communications operations: (a) data communication; and (b) receiver time base synchronization (providing repeatability to within a few hundreds of picoseconds). The exemplary embodiment implements these two communications operations using a single coaxial-cable based ARCNET local area network.
The ARCNET LAN uses a token passing protocol and a data transmission rate of 2.5 Mbits per second. Communication is over standard RG62 coaxial cable that will accommodate signal frequencies of up to 200 MHz without significant attenuation problems. Thus, the 200 MHz system synchronization clock can be multiplexed onto the normal ARCNET data communications traffic without any significant degradation.
FIG. 2c is a functional block diagram illustrating the LAN interface at the radiolocation system processor and the receivers. At the system processor, a LAN interface 81 includes an ARCNET interface (RIM) card 82 and a 200 MHz clock interface. A diplex filter 84 multiplexes the 200 MHz system synchronization clock 83 onto the 2.5 MHz ARCNET signal, and outputs the resulting LAN signal onto the network as normal ARCNET packet traffic.
The LAN communications from the system processor are received by the receivers of the radiolocation array. At each receiver, a LAN interface 86 includes a diplex filter 87 that demultiplexes the LAN signal to recover the 200 MHz system synchronization clock. The ARCNET packet is provided to an ARCNET interface (RIM) card 88, while the 200 MHz clock is provided through a clock interface 89 to the time base latching circuit (not shown).
Selecting a data communications network is largely a design choice. The performance requirements for the data communications operation are not particularly demanding, and could be met by a number of alternative schemes such as telephone, microwave or radio. The synchronization operation is less adaptable, being constrained by the requirement of maintaining synchronization between receivers to within a few hundreds of picoseconds--failure to maintain this synchronization equates to a loss of positional accuracy.
1.4. Position Location Processing. The radiolocation system processor receives TOA-DETECTION packets communicated over the LAN from the receivers (data acquisition), and processes the time-of-arrival data to obtain position location information (data reduction).
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating the position location processing operation. For each received TOA-DETECTION packet (TAG ID, time base TOA COUNT, and motion status), the system processor identifies (82) the TAG (object) being moved. This operation recovers the TAG ID from a TOA-DETECTION packet, where possible, and attempts to reconcile those TOA-DETECTION packets for which the TAG ID can not be extracted. For example, multipath noise received by a receiver might prevent the receiver from recovering the TAG ID for the transmitting TAG transmitter, although the TOA data may be accurate independent of the reasons a TAG identification can not be made.
All TOA-DETECTION packets are checked (83) for valid TAG ID. Those TOA-DETECTION packets without a valid TAG ID that nevertheless arrive within a given time period, such as 1000 nanoseconds, are assigned (84) to the same TAG transmitter. Receiver redundancy, including a combination of valid TOA-DETECTION packets (i.e., valid TAG ID) and assigned TOA-DETECTION packets, enables the data reduction algorithm to determine the validity, or invalidity, of any of the assigned TOA-DETECTION.
Once the TOA-DETECTION packets associated with a given TAG transmitter have been identified or assigned (82), the time-of-arrival data for that TAG transmitter is processed (85) using conventional differential time-of-arrival algorithms to obtain object position information. For two-dimensional object tracking, if at least three TOA-DETECTION packets have been identified (86), then object position can be computed (87) using the receiver ID and time-of-arrival data (three-dimensional tracking would require at least four TOA measurements). Additional TOA-DETECTION packets represent redundant position location information that can also be used (88) by the object location algorithms.
The position location information computed from the received TOA packets is conventionally stored (92) in a fully indexed object tracking database that includes: (a) TAG ID (16 bits); (b) motion status; (c) object location; (d) location qualification vector; and (e) time.
Motion status is stored as a 4-bit quantity (sixteen combinations) that, in the exemplary embodiment indicates Motion Initiated, Motion Continuing or Motion Stopped. Examples of additional status information that could be communicated and stored include: (a) a No Motion status, transmitted at selected intervals while an object is stationary to provide an updated record of the active TAG transmitters whether or not moving, and to assist in identifying TAG transmitter failures; and (b) the status of membrane-type key depressions on the TAG transmitter (such as an operator-initiated alert), allowing key-type status to be passed to the system processor directly from the TAG transmitter or from automatic sources (such as an automatic guided vehicle).
Object location is stored in 32-bit longitude and latitude quantities. The location qualification vector represents an error radial based on the build-up of approximation calculations, TOA triggering randomness, synchronization randomness and other factors diminishing the accuracy of position location computation (to around ten feet).
The object tracking database can be queried (94) through a graphical user interface (95) using conventional database look-up and retrieval software. For the exemplary embodiment, use of a mapping database retrieval software package is recommended to permit location coordinates for any object to be posted on a map of the facility. Depending on the type of search done, the mapping database retrieval software can post to a facility map locations of a particular item, group of items, location over time, flow of items through a point in space or various combinations of such information.
1.5. Calibration. To operate the radiolocation system with TOA resolution in nanoseconds, minute changes in circuit operational parameters and propagation characteristics, such as might result from changes in temperature and humidity within the facility, must be taken into account. Such changes are accommodated through system calibration.
Referring to FIG. 2b, the radiolocation system includes calibration transmitters 35. These transmitters are installed at fixed, predetermined locations, such as by mounting at or in the ceiling of the facility in the same manner as the radiolocation receivers 20. The number and location of calibration transmitters 50 is determined principally by the need to ensure that each of the receivers in array 20 is able to receive the calibration transmission of at least three calibration transmitters.
Distributing the calibration transmitters such that each receiver receives additional calibration transmissions provides calibration redundancy to accommodate communication errors (such as loss of calibration transmitter ID). If the calibration transmitters are co-located with the receivers, the differential time-of-arrival processing of TAG transmissions from the calibration transmitters could be used to generate a survey of the receiver array.
In operation, the calibration transmitters are programmed to transmit calibration signals at predetermined intervals, such as every 100 seconds. Each calibration transmission includes the associated calibration transmitter ID.
These calibration transmissions are received by the radiolocation receivers, which detect time-of-arrival in the same manner as TAG transmissions. The receivers transmit calibration data packets (calibration transmitter ID and TOA COUNT) to system processor 40 over the LAN.
System processor 40 receives the calibration packets and computes the locations of the calibration transmitters from the time-of-arrival data using the same procedures as used in object tracking. The computed positions for each calibration transmitter, and the associated differential time-of-arrival values for the receivers, are compared to the known positions and associated differential time-of-arrival values for those transmitters--apparent positional and TOA differences are converted into new calibration coefficients for each receiver.
For each calibration interval, updated calibration coefficients are stored in the object-location database, and used to adjust the time-of-arrival data provided by each receiver in the course of normal object tracking operations.
2. Radiolocation System--Area Detection. As a low cost alternative to the high resolution embodiment of the radiolocation system using differential time-of-arrival, the radiolocation system of the invention can be implemented as a low resolution embodiment using receivers configured to detect TAG transmissions only from respective assigned areas. This embodiment differs from the high resolution embodiment described in Section 1 in two principal respects:
(a) object-location resolution is determined by the size of assigned receiver areas rather than time-of-arrival differentiation; and
(b) receivers only receive TAG transmissions from TAGs transmitting within respective assigned areas, so that object location is effected when a receiver receives a TAG transmission with the TAG ID.
The low resolution embodiment offers significant cost savings by eliminating the need for time-of-arrival detection (TOA triggering and time base latching).
Referring to FIG. 2a, for the low resolution embodiment, the receivers of the radiolocation array 20 would be configured to detect TAG transmissions from TAGs located within respective object-location areas of a predetermined size (providing a predetermined object-location resolution).
For example, directional antennas could be used at selected receiver locations, with the size of the object-location area being determined by the predetermined antenna beamwidth. In this case, selecting receiver location is flexible, subject to providing coverage for an assigned object-location area.
Alternatively, the receivers could be distributed in a grid, with the size of the object-location area being determined by the predetermined spacing between receivers. In this case, object location resolution is a function of receiver spacing, with TAG transmitter power being cooperatively selected so that a TAG transmission is received by the most proximate receiver (in this configuration, receipt of a TAG transmission by more than one receiver represents a loss of object location resolution).
Referring to FIG. 2a, for the low resolution embodiment, the TAG transmitter 50 can be implemented as described in Sections 1.1 and 4 for the high resolution radiolocation embodiment. Thus, the TAG transmitter can include a spread spectrum transmitter 52 that transmits TAG transmissions only when TAG (object) motion is detected using battery saving circuit 54 and motion detector 56, with periodic re-transmissions during object motion as determined by periodicity control 58.
Again, the principal design difference would be the selection of power output from the spread spectrum transmitter--for the configuration in which object location is based on receiver spacing, TAG transmission power will be relatively low to limit range, and therefore, the likelihood that a TAG transmission will be received by more than one receiver. For example, for the high resolution embodiment (where TAG transmission reception by multiple receivers is desired), TAG transmission power might be in a range of 0.01 to 1 watt (see Section 3), while for the low power embodiment, TAG transmission power might be around one microwatt to provide an effective range of around 10 meters.
Referring to FIG. 2b, for the low resolution embodiment, the radiolocation receiver 60 can be significantly reduced in complexity and cost by eliminating those components associated with time-of-arrival detection. Thus, the only circuits that need be included are the spread spectrum receiver 66 and the programmed controller 68, although some type of receiver front end will probably be required to provide amplification and filtering.
In particular, the TOA trigger circuit 64 and the time base latching circuit 65 are no longer required to support time-of-arrival detection. Moreover, the programmable controller need not be programmed to control these circuits.
Thus, in operation, the spread spectrum receiver would operate as described in Section 3, receiving a TAG transmission from the receiver front end and recovering the TAG ID and motion status from the TX-packet, outputting an RX-packet with the recovered TAG ID and motion status. The RX-packet would be retrieved by the programmed controller.
The programmed controller would generate a corresponding AREA-DETECTION packet including TAG ID and motion status. The AREA-DETECTION packet would be communicated over the LAN to the radiolocation system processor.
The radiolocation system processor would receive AREA-DETECTION packets from the receivers of the radiolocation array, and perform object-location processing to update the object location database. For this embodiment which uses area detection rather than time-of-arrival differentiation, object location for a TAG need not be computed, but only recorded based on the receipt of AREA-DETECTION packets including the TAG ID from the receiver assigned to the area in which the TAG (object) is located.
3. Spread Spectrum Communications. For the exemplary embodiment, the radiolocation system uses spread spectrum communications under the FCC Part 15.247 regulations for unlicensed operations in the 902-928 MHz band. In addition to avoiding licensing requirements, spread spectrum communications is advantageous in differentiating direct-path TAG transmissions from the associated multipath noise, and in enabling low power operations (the maximum allowed transmitter power under Part 15.247 is one watt).
Spread spectrum transmission involves constant frequency shifts, sometimes referred to as "frequency hopping". The frequency shifts result in different angles of reflection on rough reflective surfaces, causing the multipath reflections to break into frequency components fluctuating in space.
Because the spread spectrum multipath reflections are space diverse, these components do not arrive as coherently as direct-path transmissions. This difference in coherence facilitates receiving the direct-path TAG transmission and recovering the TAG ID.
Using spread spectrum communications enables low power TAG transmitters (less than one watt) to achieve relatively long range operation by transmitting in short bursts at high peak power levels. Achieving high peak transmission power is important for the high resolution embodiment of the radiolocation system because it reduces the number of receivers required to ensure that a TAG transmission is received by at least three receivers (and usually more for the sake of redundancy).
The pulsed operation that characterizes spread spectrum communications requires noncoherent data reception. That is, unlike coherent data communications where a receiver is able to lock onto a carrier signal for demodulation, a spread spectrum receiver must acquire a synchronization lock with the incoming TAG transmission rapidly enough to ensure that the TAG ID data included in the TX-packet can be recovered.
A significant advantage of using spread spectrum communications to obtain short transmission pulses and noncoherent data reception is that battery usage is significantly lowered, albeit at the expense of some degree of data integrity or bit error rate (BER). For example, one error in 105 is typical for noncoherent receiver design, while one in 109 is typical in coherent receiver design.
For the high resolution embodiment of the radiolocation system of the invention, a higher error rate is tolerable because: (a) data reception is usually redundant due to receiver overlap (i.e., typically more than three receivers receive a given TAG transmission); and (b) time-of-arrival detection does not always require that a particular TAG ID be properly received since the system processor can often determine that the triggering event occurred and is associated with the TAG ID received at other receivers.
Selecting a particular spread spectrum communications system is a design choice involving primarily commercial considerations. A number of spread spectrum communications systems are commercially available. For the exemplary embodiments, the radiolocation system uses a commercially available system, SPREADEX--Short Range Spread Spectrum Wireless Control, Telemetry and Data Radio Communication System, available from Hillier Technologies Limited Partnership. This spread spectrum system is described in Appendix A (Transmitter) and Appendix B (Receiver), and in the related U.S. Pat., the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
FIG. 4a is a functional block diagram of the SPREADEX spread spectrum communication system. The spread spectrum system includes a transmitter 100 (incorporated into each TAG transmitter) and a receiver 110 (incorporated into each receiver in the receiver array).
Spread spectrum transmitter 100 includes a control module 102 that generates the receiver master clock (using a standard digital logic crystal oscillator frequency of about 2 MHz), and provides power control, control data and operation sequencing. A spreader 103 implements an appropriate spreading (chipping) sequence to produce a spread spectrum TX-packet (TAG transmission).
The TX-packet is applied to a modulator 104 that includes shaping circuitry and a varactor diode modulating a temperature stabilized oscillator. The output of the modulator is a shaped frequency-shift-keyed signal. A final transmitter RF stage 106 provides amplification as appropriate for the selected power level (typically between 0.01 watts and the legal limit of 1 watt), together with output filtering to assure compliance with the FCC regulations on out-of-band emissions. The resulting TAG transmission is broadcast from antenna 108 (either on-board or external).
FIG. 4b shows the format of a TX-packet. It includes a preamble, a sync bit, a 16-bit TAG ID field and a 16-bit data field consisting, in the exemplary embodiment, of 12 filler bits and 4 status (data) bits. This TAG transmission packet is spread in spreader 103 by combining the packet bits with the appropriate chipping sequence. The chip clock is about 1 MHz (one half the spread spectrum transmitter crystal oscillator clock frequency), and a packet is transmitted in 619 microseconds (619 chip clock cycles), of which the first 128 microseconds are used to transmit the preamble and sync bits (i.e., prior to the TAG ID and data fields). Thus, the packet bits (including synchronization) are transmitted at about 60 Kbps, while the actual data bits are transmitted at about 52 Kbps.
Referring to FIG. 4a, spread spectrum receiver 110 includes, in addition to an antenna 112, three major stages: receiver RF front end 114, receiver IF demodulator 115 and a despreader 116. Receiver front end 114 includes a preamplifier and mixer to convert the incoming TAG transmission signal into a typical 45 MHz intermediate frequency (IF) signal. The signal is then passed to the receiver IF demodulator 115, a Motorola 13055 IF processor integrated circuit which performs demodulation.
The demodulated signal is applied to despreader 116 for despreading with a digital matched filter using analog summing and comparison. Synchronization for despreading is provided by a 2 MHz crystal oscillator 118, which should be at the same frequency as the clock in spread spectrum transmitter 100 plus or minus 400ppm to ensure acquiring synchronization lock.
The spread spectrum receiver must acquire synchronization lock to be able to recover TAG ID and status data. That is, for each TX-packet, spread spectrum receiver 110 has about 128 microseconds to acquire synchronization lock (i.e., the time allocated to the preamble and sync bits) prior to the arrival of the TAG ID and status data. If synchronization lock on the TX-packet is acquired, the TAG ID and status data are recovered, and an RX-packet is generated.
While the spread spectrum receiver is attempting to achieve synchronization lock, it is in a lock-up condition that prevents it from receiving any other signals. Thus, a design goal is to attempt to minimize the number of times a signal that is actually random pulsed noise rather than a TAG transmission is applied to the spread spectrum receiver--see Section 5.2.
FIG. 4c shows the format of a RX-packet. It includes a preamble, a sync bit, and 32 data bits. The 32-bit data field includes a 16-bit TAG ID and a 2-bit motion status (in the exemplary embodiment, the other 14 bits are reserved).
Each RX-packet generated by spread spectrum receiver 110 in response to a TAG transmission is retrieved by the programmed controller (68 in FIG. 2b) in the radiolocation receiver, and used to assemble a corresponding TOA-DETECTION packet.
The specific implementation of a spread spectrum communication system forms no part of the present invention. A principal reason for selecting the SPREADEX system is that it is available as separate transmitter/receiver components, as well as a combined transceiver. Since the transmitter component is significantly less complex (and therefore, less expensive) than the receiver component, and since the number of TAG transmitters will typically greatly exceed the number of receivers in the radiolocation array (even in the case of the low resolution embodiment), then using just a transmitter for the TAG transmitter component greatly reduces the cost of configuring a radiolocation system.
4. TAG Transmitter. Referring to FIG. 2a, a TAG transmitter 50 performs three basic functions: (a) spread spectrum communication with TAG transmissions; (b) motion detection to enable TAG transmission; and (c) periodicity control to establish TAG transmission intervals.
Spread spectrum transmitter 52 is described in Section 2 and Appendix A, and in the related patent. For each TAG transmitter, the unique 16-bit TAG ID is provided in an address selection operation by etching or scratching 16 diode connections on the spread spectrum transmitter card.
Spread spectrum transmitter 52 is responsive to start-transmission inputs TX1 and TX2 to initiate a spread spectrum TAG transmission when either strobe line transitions active--TX1 is provided by battery saving circuit 54 and TX1 is provided by periodicity control 58. Both of these start-transmission inputs are inactive during a power-saver mode. For each TAG transmission, the spread spectrum transmitter provides a TXENABLE output that signals the end of the TX-packet transmission.
Spread spectrum transmitter 52 also receives two motion status (data) inputs STAT1 and STAT2--STAT1 is provided by battery saving circuit 54, and STAT2 is provided by periodicity control 58. Both of these STAT inputs are inactive when the TAG transmitter is in the power-saver mode (indicating no motion).
Battery saving circuit 54 is a conventional multivibrator that triggers in response to each motion (jitter) indication from motion detector 56, driving its TX1/STAT1 output line active. The reset period for the multivibrator is made adjustable, using a potentiometer 54a, within a range of 1 to 60 seconds--the adjustable reset period is selected such that, during object motion, the multivibrator is continually re-triggered before the expiration of the reset period, maintaining TX1/STAT1 active. That is, the reset period establishes the length of time after object motion ceases (as indicated by the last jitter signal from the motion detector) that spread spectrum transmitter 52 will continue periodic TAG re-transmissions.
Motion detector 56 is a conventional mercury tilt (jitter) switch that provides a motion indication signal to battery saving circuit 54 each time motion is detected. The motion detector is sensitive enough that even steady movement of an object, such as on a conveyor belt, will generally cause motion indications.
Periodicity control 58 is a conventional multivibrator that triggers in response to TXENABLE (end-of-TAG transmission) from spread spectrum transmitter 52, causing TX2/STAT2 to transition active. The multivibrator is reset, and TX2/STAT2 transitions inactive, after a reset period that is adjustable, using a potentiometer 58a, within a range of 1 to 60 seconds--the reset period establishes the length of time after a TAG transmission (as indicated by TXENABLE) that the periodicity control circuit will output a TX2 start-transmission strobe to spread spectrum transmitter 52, initiating a re-transmission.
At the commencement of object motion, battery saving circuit 54 responds to an initial motion indication from motion detector 56 to provide a TX1/STAT1 strobe, causing a TAG transmission with a Motion Initiated status.
During object motion, motion detector 56 provides motion (jitter) indications, continuously retriggering the multivibrator in batter saving circuit 54, so that TX1/STAT1 remains active. After each TAG transmission, the TXENABLE strobe from spread spectrum transmitter 52 triggers the multivibrator in periodicity control 58, which is then reset after the predetermined reset period to provide a TX2/STAT2 strobe. This action initiates periodic TAG re-transmissions with a Motion Continuing status.
When object motion ceases, motion detector 56 stops providing motion indications to trigger the multivibrator in battery saving circuit 54. After the predetermined reset period, the multivibrator is reset, and the battery saving circuit switches TX1/STAT1 inactive, and at the same time, provides a reset strobe to periodicity control 58. This action immediately resets the multivibrator, causing a TX2/STAT2 strobe to initiate one last TAG transmission with a Motion Stopped status.
For the exemplary embodiment, battery savings circuit 54 and periodicity control 58 are implemented together with a dual multivibrator integrated circuit package No. 79HC123. Potentiometer adjustments can be set based on the expected object motion and the number of TAG transmitters (objects) within transmission range of each other. Typically, a TAG transmitter will be set to retrigger every 15 seconds, and after object movement ceases, will continue to transmit 30 more seconds. The IC package typically uses under 10 microamps when the TAG transmitter is in the power-saver mode.
System design should assume that message collisions in time are inevitable, even though spread spectrum frequency hopping minimizes such collisions. To minimize message collisions, and to permit large populations of TAGs, two parameters should be optimized: (a) time of transmission should be made short; and (b) periodicity should be randomized. Failure to adequately limit transmission time causes the allowable population to decrease because of the increase in overlapping or colliding transmissions. Failure to adequately randomize periodicity causes the possibility of two TAG transmitters synchronizing, so that neither message is received.
For the exemplary embodiment, the duration of a TAG transmission (619 microseconds) is short for a radio device. If the TAG transmitters could be synchronized, then over 1,000 tags could transmit per second. Because the TAG transmitters are not synchronized, they behave in random bursts for which conventional statistical analysis can be used to minimize collisions by adjustment of periodicity for the given TAG population.
Randomness of the periodic TAG transmissions is achieved as a result of two factors. First, the initiation of motion is based upon mechanical motion, which is a random event in the context of the radiolocation system--even if multiple objects are moved together (such as by a conveyor belt), the objects are not moved in synchronicity within a synchronization window of about a millisecond window. Furthermore, the potentiometers can be used to add random periodicity. Second, the multivibrators in the battery savings and periodicity control circuit typically have a decay time subject to a Schmitt trigger voltage level that may vary from part to part by over 1 volt. Thus, the periodicity introduced by the periodicity control circuits will vary sufficiently to introduce a significant degree of randomness.
5. Radiolocation Receiver. Referring to FIG. 2b, each receiver of the array 20 performs four basic functions: (a) receiving spread spectrum communications; (b) triggering at the time-of-arrival of a TAG transmission; (c) latching the time base TOA COUNT of the 800 MHz synchronization counter in response to a TOA trigger; and (d) outputting onto the LAN TOA-DETECTION packets which include the time-of-arrival data for each TAG transmission. The highly stable 800 MHz time base clock (1.25 nanoseconds per cycle) provides an ideal distance resolution of about one foot.
TAG transmissions are received by the receiver front end 62 (ANT PORT), and applied immediately to TOA trigger 64. The TOA trigger circuit provides a TOA trigger (TOA DETECT) to time base latching circuit 65. The time base latching circuit latches the time base count of the 800 MHz time base clock, derived from the 200 MHz synchronization clock (200 MIN). In addition, the time base latching circuit performs digital noise filtering to attempt to ensure that the TOA trigger circuit is triggered by a TAG transmission rather than random pulsed noise--if a valid TAG transmission is indicated, the time base latching circuit enables (SSOUTEN) receiver front end 62 to provide the TX-packet to spread spectrum receiver 66 (SSOUT/SSIN).
FIG. 5a is a schematic diagram of a receiver front end 120. The receiver front end receives the spread spectrum TAG transmission through antenna port 121 (ANT PORT in FIG. 2a). The radio signal is amplified in two stages by amplifiers 122 and 123, with filtering by helical filters 124 and 125. The TAG transmission signal propagates through the receiver front end with some amount of propagation delay.
After amplification and filtering, the received TAG transmission is passed to a power splitter 126 that divides the radio signal for input (a) through a solid state switch 128, to the spread spectrum receiver (66 in FIG. 2a), and (b) to a TOA trigger circuit 130 (64 in FIG. 2a). The receiver front end does not provide the TX-packet of the TAG transmission to the spread spectrum receiver until the solid state switch is enabled by SSOUTEN from the time base latch circuit (65 in FIG. 2a).
Referring to FIG. 2a, spread spectrum receiver 66 is described in Section 2 and Appendix B, and in the related patent. The receiver does not receive TX-packets from receiver front end 62 (SSOUT/SSIN) until time base latching circuit 65 decides that the received radio signal is a TAG transmission rather than random pulsed noise and provides SSOUTEN--this delay correspondingly reduces the 128 microsecond window for acquiring synchronization lock (see Sections 3 and 5.2).
Once receiver 66 has acquired synchronization lock, it provides an ACQLK signal, and proceeds to recover TAG ID and motion status from the TX-packet. The receiver then assembles a corresponding RX-packet (including TAG ID and motion status), switching RRDY active when the RX-packet is available at the serial port RSO for retrieval by the programmed controller.
Programmed controller 68 responds to RRDY active by providing an RSCLK clock signal to clock the RX-packet out of the RSO serial port.
5.1. TOA Trigger Circuit. Referring to FIG. 2a, TOA trigger circuit 64 is located on the same card as receiver front end 62, with mechanical separation being provided for signal isolation.
TOA triggering is accomplished without using mixing to obtain a down-converted intermediated frequency. While down-conversion would reduce the sensitivity required for the TOA trigger circuit, it would also reduce trigger accuracy by the period of the intermediate frequency. That is, phase differences between the transmitter oscillator and the receiver local oscillator can cause errors of up to a full IF period, leading to amplified inaccuracies.
FIG. 5a is a schematic diagram of a TOA trigger circuit 130. The TOA trigger circuit is a conventional peak-hold design--the TAG transmission signal is passed through a diode 132 to a signal-level-threshold capacitor 133, which maintains charge as a function of the highest, most recent signal.
The TOA trigger function is provided by a high speed comparator 135, which receives the TAG transmission signal and a programmable signal-level reference voltage from digital potentiometer 136. The digital potentiometer is set by a signal INCPOT from the programmed controller (see FIG. 2a).
Comparator 135 is selected for high speed and minimal dispersion characteristics, such as an FFD 96687 BQ. By minimizing dispersion, comparator output responds at the same or similar rate when driven by high power (comparator overdrive) or low power signals. The comparator reference voltage is adjusted by programmable potentiometer 136 to provide a predetermined signal-level threshold.
Upon receipt of a signal from receiver front end 120 (through power splitter 126) that exceeds the signal-level threshold set by the comparator reference voltage from potentiometer 136, comparator 135 triggers rapidly, asserting a TOA DETECT trigger signal. The TOA DETECT trigger is provided to the time base latching circuit (65 in FIG. 2a) as a possible indication of the arrival of a TAG transmission--at this point, the asserted TOA DETECT trigger may indicate a TAG transmission or random pulsed noise.
TOA DETECT remains asserted as long as the input signal remains above the comparator reference voltage--when the signal disappears beneath that predetermined signal-level threshold, either at the end of the TAG transmission or the end of the random pulsed noise, detector capacitor 133 decays, causing comparator 135 to switch and deassert TOA DETECT. Based on the length of time that the TOA DETECT trigger remains asserted, the time base latching circuit decides whether to-treat it as a TAG transmission. 5.2 Time-Base Latching Circuit. Referring to FIG. 2a, time base latching circuit receives, in addition to the TOA DETECT trigger from TOA trigger circuit 64, the 200 MHz system synchronization clock from LAN interface 69 (200 MIN), and ACQLK from spread spectrum receiver 66 (indicating that the receiver has achieved the synchronism necessary for data recovery).
Time base latching circuit is a high-speed statusizing latch circuit that performs both time base latching and digital filtering, while minimizing metastability problems associated with asynchronous latching. The circuit is configured from both high-speed ECL and TTL register sections. These registers are written and read by programmed controller 68 using REGSEL and R/-W to select a register and the type of operation, with data/parameter transfer over REGDATA.
FIG. 5b illustrates the register configuration 140 of a time base latching circuit. The registers are used for either time base latching or digital filtering operations. All registers are coupled to a Control Bus over which they may be read and/or written.
The time base latching operation is implemented using the following register designations:
______________________________________                                    
TIME BASE     24-bit 800 MHz counter                                      
TIME BASE OV  overflow interrupt (msbit of the TIME                       
              BASE register)                                              
TOA LATCH     24-bit latch                                                
______________________________________                                    
These registers configured in sections using high speed ECL logic.
The TIME BASE register is an 800 MHz time base counter (non-readable) that is clocked by an 800 MHz time base clock--this clock is derived from the 200 MHz system synchronization clock provided by the radiolocation system processor by conventional phase coherent frequency multiplication. When the TOA DETECT trigger is asserted, indicating the arrival of a signal that could be a TAG transmission, the time base TOA COUNT in the TIME BASE register is immediately latched into the TOA LATCH register.
The most significant bit of the TIME BASE register is a time base overflow TIME BASE OV that outputs an interrupt onto the Control Bus--this overflow indication is latched in a STATUS register and read by the programmable controller, which maintains a total overflow count. At 800 Mhz, or a period of 1.25 nanoseconds, the 32-bit counter counts for about 21 milliseconds before overflow.
The TOA LATCH register receives a paralleled input from the TIME BASE register, and latches the time base TOA COUNT in that register when the TOA DETECT trigger is asserted. The TOA LATCH register minimizes the problem of digital latching metastability, which results from the occurrence of an asynchronous triggering event (TOA DETECT) during a window of time that the TIME BASE counter is incrementing. Such a statusizing arrangement will typically use a Johnson (or Gray code) counter as the high frequency (least significant) section(s) of the 800 MHz TIME BASE counter, reducing the number of bits in transition.
The TOA LATCH register is read section-by-section over the Control Bus by the programmed controller when the time base latching circuit has determined, in a digital filtering function, that the TOA DETECT trigger represents the arrival of a TAG transmission.
The digital filtering function is implemented using the following control and writable register designations:
______________________________________                                    
MAX NOISE LENGTH 16-bit signal-duration threshold                         
                 parameter                                                
TOA TO ACQLK     16-bit counter                                           
TOA DETECT LENGTH                                                         
                 24-bit counter                                           
NOISE COUNT      16-bit counter                                           
STATUS           8-bit latch                                              
______________________________________                                    
These registers are configured in sections using TTL logic.
The digital filtering function defines three states of the radiolocation receiver:
(a) ARMED1--TOA DETECT trigger de-asserted, waiting for a signal that exceeds the signal-level threshold established by the comparator reference voltage;
(b) ARMED2--TOA DETECT trigger asserted, waiting for a count of MAX NOISE LENGTH to qualify the triggering signal as a TAG transmission; and
(c) DISARMED--TOA DETECT asserted longer than the MAX NOISE LENGTH parameter.
When the time base latching circuit recognizes a received signal as a TAG transmission, and invokes the DISARMED state, the circuit provides (a) SSOUTEN to enable transfer of the TAG transmission (TX-packet) to the spread spectrum receiver, and (b) an interrupt to notify the programmed controller that a TAG transmission has been received and the latched time base TOA COUNT is available to be read from the TOA LATCH.
Once the DISARMED state is invoked, REARMing the radiolocation receiver (i.e., the time base latching circuit) requires a REARM command from the programmed controller (even if the TOA DETECT trigger becomes deasserted). The programmed controller provides the REARM command over the Control Bus to a flip-flop 142 that controls the TOA LATCH.
The contents of the TOA LATCH register are valid when the radiolocation receiver is put in the DISARMED state. That is, when TOA DETECT is asserted for long enough to indicate a valid TX-packet, the resulting interrupt notifies the programmed controller that the TOA LATCH register contains the time base TOA COUNT.
The radiolocation receiver is REARMed to ARMED1 either (a) from DISARMED when a valid TX-packet is detected and the least significant register sections of TOA LATCH are read, or (b) from ARMED2 when TOA DETECT is deasserted before MAX NOISE LENGTH, indicating the receipt of invalid noise.
The MAX NOISE LENGTH register is settable by the programmed controller with a value that determines the transition from the ARMED2 to the DISARMED states. That is, this register is loaded with a predetermined signal-duration threshold parameter, typically around one microsecond, that defines the duration threshold at which a received signal that causes assertion of the TOA DETECT trigger is deemed to be a TAG transmission rather than random pulsed noise.
Thus, the signal-duration threshold parameter in MAX NOISE LENGTH is used to control TOA detection sensitivity. In particular, if the MAX NOISE LENGTH parameter is too large, the spread spectrum receiver (which does not receive the TX-packet until SSOUTEN is provided after MAX NOISE LENGTH is reached) will not have enough of the 128 microsecond preamble window in which to acquire a synchronization lock (ACQLK must be achieved to recover the TAG ID).
TOA TO ACQLK is a 1 MHz 16-bit counter that measures the time between the receipt by the time base latching circuit of (a) the TOA DETECT trigger from the TOA trigger circuit, and (b) the ACQLK signal from the spread spectrum receiver. This register is used for two operations: (a) in conjunction with the MAX NOISE LENGTH register, signalling that a count of MAX NOISE LENGTH has elapsed since assertion of the TOA DETECT trigger; and (b) indicating the elapsed time after the TOA DETECT trigger for the spread spectrum receiver to achieve ACQLK (a value that can be used by the programmed controller to adjust the MAX NOISE LENGTH parameter).
When the count in TOA TO ACQLK reaches MAX NOISE LENGTH, a comparator 144 triggers to cause a transition in flip-flop 142 (DISARM/REARM). If TOA DETECT is still asserted at this time, the DISARM state is invoked, indicating a valid TAG transmission. An interrupt notifies the programmed controller that the TOA LATCH contains a valid time base TOA COUNT, which is read by the programmed controller after the TOA DETECT trigger is deasserted indicating the end of the TAG transmission.
The TOA DETECT LENGTH register is a 10 MHz 24-bit counter that measures the lapsed count during which TOA DETECT remains asserted, i.e., for the duration of the TX-packet, and is valid only in the DISARMED state. This register is resolved to approximately one microsecond, and can count beyond 619 (the standard TX-packet being 619 microseconds in duration). It can be used for confirmation that a TOA DETECT trigger that remains asserted beyond MAX NOISE LENGTH is, in fact, a valid TX-packet.
The NOISE COUNTER register provides a count of assertions of the TOA DETECT trigger since the last REARMing (i.e., since the last TOA DETECT trigger was asserted for longer than MAX NOISE LENGTH, and the associated time base TOA COUNT was read from the TOA LATCH), thereby providing a count of the number of TOA DETECT triggers that are discarded as being attributable to random pulsed noise rather than a TAG transmission. This count is used by programmed controller 68 to adjust the two noise-sensitivity thresholds--the comparator reference voltage and MAX NOISE LENGTH--to minimize TOA DETECT triggering off random pulsed noise.
In summary, the effect of the digital filtering function is to delay applying a received signal to the spread spectrum receiver until after the TOA DETECT trigger is asserted for longer than a predetermined (programmable) count of MAX NOISE LENGTH, thereby indicating that the received signal is a TAG transmission rather than random pulsed noise. This digital filtering function minimizes lock-up of the spread spectrum receiver on non-TX-packets.
Selecting the MAX NOISE LENGTH parameter depends on how fast the spread spectrum receiver can acquire synchronization lock, and the prevalence in the receiver environment of random pulsed noise. In addition to temporal digital filtering by the time base latching circuit, signal-level filtering is provided by selecting the comparator reference level for triggering the comparator in the TOA detector circuit (using INCPOT from the programmed controller).
For example, if the MAX NOISE LENGTH parameter is so short that non-TX-packets are nevertheless causing regular transitions from ARMED2 to DISARMED (indicating valid TX-packets), and if the invalid noise is of short duration, MAX NOISE LENGTH can be lengthened to exclude these noise signals.
Alternatively, if MAX NOISE LENGTH is regularly exceeded on non-TX-packets, and if the noise signal strength is low, then the comparator reference level can be increased by incrementing INCPOT to remove these interfering signals. Care must be taken against setting this comparator reference level so high as to prevent the TOA detector circuit from regularly asserting the TOA DETECT trigger for attenuated but valid TX-packets.
A recommended design approach is to maximize MAX NOISE LENGTH (maximize the signal duration threshold), and minimize the INCPOT setting for the comparator reference voltage (minimize the signal-level threshold).
5.3 Programmable Controller. Referring to FIG. 2b, programmable controller 68 is a commercially available, configurable system from INTEL (WILDCARD). It is small in size and has a relatively high density motherboard permitting the use of other peripherals. The CPU is an Intel 8088 with standard interface logic. The system comes with the following other components: (a) 256K RAM for program store; (b) 32K ROM for driver program with down-line loader; (c) peripheral controller based upon the Intel 8255; and (d) Arcnet interface.
When configured, the programmed controller is equivalent to a diskless, networked processor, standard in the industry for local area networks. The peripheral controller interfaces to (a) time base latching circuit 65 for reading and writing registers including retrieving the time base TOA COUNT from the TOA LATCH register, (b) spread spectrum receiver 66 for retrieving RX-packets (with TAG ID and motion status), and (c) TOA trigger 64 for setting the comparator reference level provided by the programmable potentiometer (136 in FIG. 5a).
At power-on, programmed controller 68 performs the following functions:
(a) Initialize the Arcnet, 8255 and 8088 to known states;
(b) Requests a down-line load from the radiolocation system processor (the network file server) over the network;
(c) Requests configuration information from the system processor specific to that receiver (as identified by its Arcnet identification address); and
(d) Arms the time base latching circuit to the ARMED1 state (awaiting a TOA DETECT trigger from the TOA trigger circuit).
With the radiolocation receiver (i.e., the time base latching circuit) in the ARMED1 state, the programmed controller awaits a MAX NOISE LENGTH interrupt from the time base latching circuit--a TOA DETECT trigger (ARMED2) followed by a timeout of the MAX NOISE LENGTH counter (DISARMED)--indicating that a valid TX-packet has been received.
On receiving the MAX NOISE LENGTH interrupt, programmed controller 68 awaits deassertion of the TOA DETECT trigger (which indicates that receipt of the TAG transmission is complete), and then reads the TOA LATCH register to retrieve the time base count for the TX-packet. For statistical reasons, prior to reading the least significant register sections of the TOA LATCH, thereby effecting REARM, the programmed controller may also read the other registers of the time base latching circuit, which are still valid prior REARM. ##SPC1##

Claims (60)

What is claimed is:
1. A location system for locating objects within a tracking environment using time-of-arrival differentiation for electromagnetic transmissions received at multiple receivers, comprising:
for each object, a TAG transmitter for transmitting, at selected intervals, TAG transmissions that include a unique TAG ID;
an array of receivers distributed within the tracking environment such that a TAG transmission is received by at least three receivers;
each receiver including a time-of-arrival circuit and a data communications controller;
the time-of-arrival circuit is responsive to the arrival of a TAG transmission for providing a TOA count corresponding to the time-of-arrival of the most direct path for such TAG transmission, with the TOA count being synchronized to a system synchronization clock provided to each receiver;
the data communications controller is responsive to the receipt of a TAG transmission for providing a corresponding TOA-detection packet that includes the associated TAG ID and TOA count; and
a location processor for receiving the TOA detection packets, and for determining the location of each TAG, and its associated object, from at least three corresponding TOA-detection packets received from different receivers.
2. The location system of claim 1, wherein spread spectrum communications is used for TAG transmissions.
3. The location system of claim 2, wherein the spread spectrum communications are in the frequency range of 900 Mhz.
4. The location system of claim 2, wherein the duration of a TAG transmission is around 600 microseconds.
5. The location system of claim 1, wherein each TAG transmission includes selected status information.
6. The location system of claim 5, wherein the selected status information is generated without operator intervention.
7. The location system of claim 1, wherein the TAG transmitter includes a motion detection circuit for detecting motion of the object, and for enabling the TAG transmitter to transmit TAG transmissions while the object is in motion.
8. The location system of claim 7, wherein TAG transmissions are transmitted only while the object is in motion and for a relatively short predetermined period of time after motion has ceased.
9. The location system of claim 8, wherein each TAG transmission includes an appropriate motion status indication.
10. The location system of claim 9, wherein each TAG transmission includes the appropriate one of at least three motion status indications: Motion Initiated, Motion Continuing, Motion Stopped.
11. The location system of claim 1, wherein the TAG transmitter includes a periodicity control circuit for causing the TAG transmitter to transmit TAG transmissions at selected intervals each time the object is being moved.
12. The location system of claim 11, wherein TAG transmissions are transmitted at relatively short intervals while the object is in motion, and at relatively long intervals while the object is stationary.
13. The location system of claim 1, wherein the time-of-arrival circuit provides an adjustable level of noise sensitivity for differentiating TAG transmissions from noise.
14. The location system of claim 13, wherein noise sensitivity is determined by a selected signal level threshold and a selected signal duration threshold.
15. The location system of claim 1, wherein the time-of-arrival circuit comprises:
a TOA trigger circuit for providing a TOA-DETECT trigger immediately upon arrival of a direct-path TAG transmission; and
a time base latching circuit responsive to the TOA-DETECT trigger for latching the associated TOA count of the synchronized time base.
16. The location system of claim 15, wherein the TOA trigger circuit provides the TOA-DETECT trigger when a the signal level of a received signal exceeds a signal-level threshold, thereby indicating that the received signal is a TAG transmission.
17. The location system of claim 16, wherein the TOA trigger circuit includes a comparator for providing a TOA-DETECT trigger when the signal level of a received signal exceeds a comparator reference level.
18. The location system of claim 17, wherein the signal-level comparator reference level is adjustable.
19. The location system of claim 15, wherein the time base latching circuit indicates when the duration of the received signal exceeds a signal-duration threshold, thereby designating the received signal as a TAG transmission.
20. The location system of claim 19, wherein:
the TOA-DETECT trigger remains asserted during receipt of a TAG transmission; and
the time base latching circuit provides the signal-duration indication when the duration of the TOA-DETECT trigger exceeds a selected MAX NOISE LENGTH count.
21. The location system of claim 15, wherein the time base latching circuit includes a time base counter that counts at a rate of around 800 MHz and is derived from the system synchronization signal.
22. The location system of claim 1, wherein the receivers are coupled to the location processor by a local area network, with each receiver including a LAN interface, such that the TOA detection packets are communicated to the location processor over the LAN.
23. The location system of claim 22, wherein the system synchronization clock signal is communicated to each receiver over the LAN.
24. The location system of claim further comprising:
at least one calibration transmitter, positioned at a known location, for transmitting calibration transmissions receivable by each of the receivers;
each receiver being responsive to a calibration transmission for providing a corresponding calibration TOA detection packet, including the associated time-of-arrival TOA count, to the location processor; and
the location processor determines calibration coefficients from the calibration TOA detection packets and the known locations of the receivers, and uses those coefficients to calibrate location computations from TOA-detection packets associated with TAG transmissions.
25. A location system for locating objects within a tracking environment using area-detection by receivers that receive electromagnetic transmissions from assigned areas, comprising:
for each object, a TAG transmitter for transmitting, at selected intervals, TAG transmissions that include a unique TAG ID;
an array of receivers distributed within the tracking area, with each receiver being configured to receive TAG transmissions from an assigned area of a predetermined size;
each receiver including a data communications controller responsive to the receipt of a TAG transmission for providing a corresponding area-detection packet that includes the received TAG ID; and
a location processor for receiving the area-detection packets, and for determining the location of each TAG, and its associated object, based on the identity of the receiver receiving the TAG transmissions for that TAG.
26. The location system of claim 25, wherein each receiver includes a directional antenna with a predetermined beamwidth, such that the receiver receives TAG transmissions originating from its assigned area.
27. The location system of claim 25, wherein:
the receivers are distributed within the tracking environment with a predetermined spacing; and
the transmitter power for each TAG transmitter and the spacing between adjacent receivers are cooperatively chosen such that a TAG transmission is almost always received by a single receiver to which the TAG is most proximate.
28. The location system of claim 25, wherein spread spectrum communications is used for the TAG transmissions.
29. The location system of claim 28, wherein the spread spectrum communications are in the frequency range of 900 Mhz.
30. The location system of claim 28, wherein the duration of a TAG transmission is around 600 microseconds.
31. The location system of claim 25, wherein the TAG transmitter includes a motion detection circuit for detecting motion of the object, and for enabling the TAG transmitter to transmit TAG transmissions while the object is in motion.
32. The location system of claim 31, wherein TAG transmissions are transmitted only while the object is in motion and for a relatively short predetermined period of time after motion has ceased.
33. The location system of claim 32, wherein each TAG transmission includes an appropriate motion status indication.
34. The location system of claim 33, wherein each TAG transmission includes the appropriate one of at least three motion status indications: Motion Initiated, Motion Continuing, Motion Stopped.
35. The location system of claim 25, wherein the TAG transmitter includes a periodicity control circuit for causing the TAG transmitter to transmit TAG transmissions at selected intervals each time the object is being moved.
36. The location system of claim 35, wherein TAG transmissions are transmitted at relatively short intervals while the object is in motion, and at relatively long intervals while the object is stationary.
37. The location system of claim 25, wherein each receiver provides an adjustable level of noise sensitivity for differentiating TAG transmissions from noise.
38. The location system of claim 37, wherein noise sensitivity is determined by a selected signal level threshold and a selected signal duration threshold.
39. The location system of claim 25, wherein the receivers are coupled to the location processor by a local area network, with each receiver including a LAN interface, such that the area detection packets are communicated to the location processor over the LAN.
40. A method for locating of objects within a tracking environment using time-of-arrival differentiation for electromagnetic transmissions received at multiple receivers, comprising the steps:
for each object, transmitting, at selected intervals, TAG transmissions that include a unique TAG ID;
providing an array of receivers distributed within the tracking environment such that a TAG transmission is received by at least three receivers;
in response to the arrival of a TAG transmission at a receiver, providing a TOA count corresponding to the time-of-arrival of the most direct path for such TAG transmission, with the TOA count being synchronized to a system synchronization clock provided to each receiver;
in response to the receipt of a TAG transmission, providing a corresponding TOA-detection packet that includes the associated TAG ID and TOA count; and
using the TOA-detection packets, determining the location of each TAG, and its associated object, from at least three corresponding TOA-detection packets received from different receivers.
41. The location method of claim 40, wherein the step of transmitting TAG transmissions further comprises detecting the motion of the object, and enabling TAG transmissions while the object is in motion.
42. The location method of claim 41, wherein each TAG transmission includes an appropriate motion status indication.
43. The location method of claim 40, wherein the step of transmitting TAG transmissions comprises the step of transmitting TAG transmissions at selected intervals each time an object is being moved.
44. The location method of claim 40, further comprising the step of adjusting receiver noise sensitivity using a signal level threshold and a signal duration threshold to differentiate TAG transmissions from noise.
45. The location method of claim 40, wherein the step of providing the TOA count comprises the steps:
providing a TOA-DETECT trigger immediately upon arrival of a direct-path TAG transmission; and
in response to the TOA-DETECT trigger, latching the associated TOA count of a time base counter derived from the system synchronism clock.
46. The location method of claim 40, wherein the receivers are coupled to the location processor by a local area network, with each receiver including a LAN interface, such that the TOA detection packets are communicated to the location processor over the LAN.
47. The location method of claim 40, further comprising the steps:
transmitting calibration transmissions from at least one known location receivable by each of the receivers;
in response to the receipt of a calibration transmission at a receiver, providing a corresponding calibration TOA detection packet, including the associated time-of-arrival TOA count; and
determining calibration coefficients from the calibration TOA detection packets and the known locations of the receivers, and using those coefficients to calibrate location computations from TOA-detection packets associated with TAG transmissions.
48. A method of locating objects within a tracking environment using area-detection by receivers that receive electromagnetic transmissions from assigned areas, comprising:
for each object, providing a TAG transmitter for transmitting, at selected intervals, TAG transmissions that include a unique TAG ID;
providing an array of receivers distributed within the tracking area, with each receiver being configured to receive TAG transmissions from an assigned area of a predetermined size;
each receiver being responsive to the receipt of a TAG transmission for providing a corresponding area-detection packet that includes the received TAG ID; and
determining the location of each TAG, and its associated object, based on the identity of the receiver receiving the TAG transmissions for that TAG as represented by the area-detection packet provided by such receiver that received the TAG transmissions.
49. The method of claim 48, wherein each receiver includes a directional antenna with a predetermined beamwidth, such that the receiver receives TAG transmissions originating from its assigned area.
50. The method of claim 48, wherein:
the receivers are distributed within the tracking environment with a predetermined spacing; and
the transmitter power for each TAG transmitter and the spacing between adjacent receivers are cooperatively chosen such that a TAG transmission is almost always received by a single receiver to which the TAG is most proximate.
51. The location method of claim 48, wherein the set of transmitting TAG transmissions further comprises detecting the motion of the object, and enabling TAG transmissions while the object is in motion.
52. The location method of claim 51, wherein each TAG transmission includes an appropriate motion status indication.
53. The location method of claim 48, wherein the step of transmitting TAG transmissions comprises the step of transmitting TAG transmissions at selected intervals each time an object is being moved.
54. The location method of claim 48, wherein the receivers are coupled to the location processor by a local area network, with each receiver including a LAN interface, such that the TOA detection packets are communicated to the location processor over the LAN. .Iadd.
55. A transmitter including:
transmitter circuitry for transmitting information; and
a motion detection circuit for detecting motion and lack of motion of the transmitter, said motion detection circuit enabling the transmit circuitry to transmit information at first selected intervals when the transmitter is in motion and enabling the transmit circuitry to transmit information periodically at second selected intervals in response to detecting lack of motion,
wherein said second selected intervals are at a low duty cycle relative to said first selected intervals..Iaddend..Iadd.56. The transmitter of claim 55, wherein the information transmitted by the transmitter circuitry includes an appropriate motion status indication..Iaddend..Iadd.57. The transmitter of claim 56, wherein the motion status indication indicates one of at least three modes: Motion Initiated, Motion Continuing, Motion
Stopped..Iaddend..Iadd.58. A transmitter including:
transmitter circuitry for transmitting information; and
a periodicity control circuit for causing the transmitter circuitry to transmit information at selected intervals in response to the transmitter being moved,
wherein the periodicity control circuit causes the transmitter circuitry to transmit at relatively short intervals while the transmitter is in motion, and at relatively long intervals while the transmitter is stationary..Iaddend..Iadd.59. A location system for locating objects within a tracking environment using area-detection by receivers that receive transmissions from assigned areas, comprising:
for each object, a TAG transmitter for transmitting, at selected intervals, TAG transmissions that include a unique TAG ID, each said TAG transmitter further including a motion detection circuit for detecting motion of the object, and for enabling the TAG transmitter to transmit TAG transmissions while the object is in motion;
an array of receivers distributed within the tracking area, with each receiver being configured to receive TAG transmissions from an assigned area of a predetermined size;
each receiver including a data communications controller responsive to the receipt of a TAG transmission for providing a corresponding area-detection packet that includes the received TAG ID; and
a location processor for receiving the area-detection packets, and for determining the location of each TAG, and its associated object, based on the identity of the receiver receiving the TAG transmissions for that TAG..Iaddend..Iadd.60. The location system of claim 59, wherein TAG transmissions are transmitted only while the object is in motion and for a relatively short predetermined period of time after motion has ceased..Iaddend..Iadd.61. The location system of claim 60, wherein each TAG transmission includes an appropriate motion status indication..Iaddend..Iadd.62. The location system of claim 61, wherein each TAG transmission includes the appropriate one of at least three motion status indications: Motion Initiated, Motion Continuing, Motion Stopped..Iaddend..Iadd.63. The location system of claim 59, wherein the TAG transmitter includes a periodicity control circuit for causing the TAG transmitter to transmit TAG transmissions at selected intervals each time
the object is being moved..Iaddend..Iadd.64. The location system of claim 63, wherein TAG transmissions are transmitted at relatively short intervals while the object is in motion, and at relatively long intervals while the object is stationary..Iaddend..Iadd.65. A location system for locating objects within a tracking environment using area-detection by receivers that receive transmissions from assigned areas, comprising:
for each object, a TAG transmitter for transmitting, at selected intervals, TAG transmissions that include a unique TAG ID;
an array of receivers distributed within the tracking area, with each receiver being configured to receive TAG transmissions from an assigned area of a predetermined size;
each receiver including a data communications controller responsive to the receipt of a TAG transmission for providing a corresponding area-detection packet that includes the received TAG ID;
a location processor for receiving the area-detection packets, and for determining the location of each TAG, and its associated object, based on the identity of the receiver receiving the TAG transmissions for that TAG; and
wherein each receiver provides an adjustable level of noise sensitivity for
differentiating TAG transmissions from noise..Iaddend..Iadd.66. A location system for locating objects within a tracking environment using area-detection by receivers that receive transmissions from assigned areas, comprising:
for each object, a TAG transmitter for transmitting at selected intervals, TAG transmissions that include a unique TAG ID;
an array of receivers distributed within the tracking area, with each receiver being configured to receive TAG transmissions from an assigned area of a predetermined size;
each receiver including a data communications controller responsive to the receipt of a TAG transmission for providing a corresponding area-detection packet that includes the received TAG ID;
a location processor for receiving the area-detection packets, and for determining the location of each TAG, and its associated object, based on the identity of the receiver receiving the TAG transmissions for that TAG; and
a local area network, said array of receivers being coupled to the location processor by said local area network, with each receiver including a LAN interface, such that the area detection packets are communicated to the location processor over said LAN..Iaddend..Iadd.67. A method of locating objects within a tracking environment using area-detection by receivers that receive transmissions from assigned areas, comprising:
for each object, providing a TAG transmitter for transmitting, at selected intervals, TAG transmissions that include a unique TAG ID;
providing an array of receivers distributed within the tracking area, with each receiver being configured to receive TAG transmissions from an assigned area of a predetermined size;
each receiver being responsive to the receipt of a TAG transmission for providing a corresponding area-detection packet that includes the received TAG ID;
determining the location of each TAG, and its associated object, based on the identity of the receiver receiving the TAG transmissions for that TAG as represented by the area-detection packet provided by such receiver that received the TAG transmissions;
said receivers being distributed within the tracking environment with a predetermined spacing; and
the transmitter power for each TAG transmitter and the spacing between adjacent receivers being cooperatively chosen such that a TAG transmission is almost always received by a single receiver to which the TAG is most proximate..Iaddend..Iadd.68. A method of locating objects within a tracking environment using area-detection by receivers that receive transmissions from assigned areas, comprising:
for each object, providing a TAG transmitter for transmitting, at selected intervals, TAG transmissions that include a unique TAG ID;
providing an array of receivers distributed within the tracking area, with each receiver being configured to receive TAG transmissions from an assigned area of a predetermined size;
each receiver being responsive to the receipt of a TAG transmission for providing a corresponding area-detection packet that includes the received TAG ID;
determining the location of each TAG, and its associated object, based on the identity of the receiver receiving the TAG transmissions for that TAG as represented by the area-detection packet provided by such receiver that received the TAG transmissions; and
wherein the set of transmitting TAG transmissions further comprises detecting the motion of the object, and enabling TAG transmissions while
the object is in motion..Iaddend..Iadd.69. The location method of claim 68, wherein each TAG transmission includes an appropriate motion status indication..Iaddend..Iadd.70. A method of locating objects within a tracking environment using area-detection by receivers that receive transmissions from assigned areas, comprising:
for each object, providing a TAG transmitter for transmitting, at selected intervals, TAG transmissions that include a unique TAG ID;
providing an array of receivers distributed within the tracking area, with each receiver being configured to receive TAG transmissions from an assigned area of a predetermined size;
each receiver being responsive to the receipt of a TAG transmission for providing a corresponding area-detection packet that includes the received TAG ID;
determining the location of each TAG, and its associated object, based on the identity of the receiver receiving the TAG transmissions for that TAG as represented by the area-detection packet provided by such receiver that received the TAG transmissions; and
wherein the step of transmitting TAG transmissions comprises the step of transmitting TAG transmissions at selected intervals each time an object
is being moved..Iaddend..Iadd.71. A method of locating objects within a tracking environment using area-detection by receivers that receive transmissions from assigned areas, comprising:
for each object, providing a TAG transmitter for transmitting, at selected intervals, TAG transmissions that include a unique TAG ID;
providing an array of receivers distributed within the tracking area, with each receiver being configured to receive TAG transmissions from an assigned area of a predetermined size;
each receiver being responsive to the receipt of a TAG transmission for providing a corresponding area-detection packet that includes the received TAG ID;
determining the location of each TAG, and its associated object, based on the identity of the receiver receiving the TAG transmissions for that TAG as represented by the area-detection packet provided by such receiver that received the TAG transmissions; and
wherein the receivers are coupled to the location processor by a local area network, with each receiver including a LAN interface, such that the TOA detection packets are communicated to the location processor over the LAN..Iaddend..Iadd.72. The transmitter of claim 56, wherein the motion status indication further indicates a fourth mode: No Motion..Iaddend..Iadd.73. The transmitter of claim 57, wherein the information transmitted by the transmitter circuitry includes an appropriate motion status indication..Iaddend..Iadd.74. The transmitter of claim 73, wherein the motion status indication indicates one of at least three modes: Motion Initiated, Motion Continuing, Motion Stopped..Iaddend..Iadd.75. The transmitter of claim 74, wherein the motion status indication further indicates a fourth mode: No Motion..Iaddend.
US08/252,842 1990-05-04 1994-06-02 Location system adapted for use in multipath environments Expired - Lifetime USRE36791E (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/252,842 USRE36791E (en) 1990-05-04 1994-06-02 Location system adapted for use in multipath environments

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/518,802 US5119104A (en) 1990-05-04 1990-05-04 Location system adapted for use in multipath environments
US08/252,842 USRE36791E (en) 1990-05-04 1994-06-02 Location system adapted for use in multipath environments

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/518,802 Reissue US5119104A (en) 1990-05-04 1990-05-04 Location system adapted for use in multipath environments

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE36791E true USRE36791E (en) 2000-07-25

Family

ID=24065566

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/518,802 Ceased US5119104A (en) 1990-05-04 1990-05-04 Location system adapted for use in multipath environments
US08/252,842 Expired - Lifetime USRE36791E (en) 1990-05-04 1994-06-02 Location system adapted for use in multipath environments

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/518,802 Ceased US5119104A (en) 1990-05-04 1990-05-04 Location system adapted for use in multipath environments

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US5119104A (en)

Cited By (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020104012A1 (en) * 2000-11-29 2002-08-01 Ensure Technologies, Inc. Security token and acess point networking
US20020145534A1 (en) * 2001-03-09 2002-10-10 Sentinel Wireless, Llc System and method for performing object association using a location tracking system
US20020167417A1 (en) * 2001-05-10 2002-11-14 Welles Kenneth Brakeley Location system using retransmission of identifying information
US6498585B2 (en) 2000-08-24 2002-12-24 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and apparatus for rapidly estimating the doppler-error and other receiver frequency errors of global positioning system satellite signals weakened by obstructions in the signal path
US6515620B1 (en) 2001-07-18 2003-02-04 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for processing positioning signals in a geometric mode
US6529160B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2003-03-04 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for determining carrier frequency offsets for positioning signals
US6628234B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2003-09-30 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for processing positioning signals in a stand-alone mode
US20030189488A1 (en) * 2002-04-05 2003-10-09 Beezerbug Incorporated Ultrasonic transmitter and receiver systems and products using the same
US20040042531A1 (en) * 2002-08-28 2004-03-04 Orhan Arikan System and method for CDMA communications
US20040041728A1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2004-03-04 Bromley Patrick G. Method and system for processing positioning signals based on predetermined message data segment
US20040235497A1 (en) * 2003-05-19 2004-11-25 Board Of Control Of Michigan Technological University Wireless local positioning system
US20050044424A1 (en) * 2000-11-29 2005-02-24 Ensure Technologies, Inc. Method of allowing access to an electronic device
US20050232081A1 (en) * 2004-01-30 2005-10-20 Sverre Holm Method and system for increased update rate in acoustic positioning
US20060013070A1 (en) * 2002-12-04 2006-01-19 Sverre Holm Ultrasonic tracking and locating system
US20060066485A1 (en) * 2004-09-24 2006-03-30 Guohua Min Wireless tracking system based upon phase differences
US20060220851A1 (en) * 2004-08-12 2006-10-05 Wherenet Corp System and method for tracking containers in grounded marine terminal operations
US20070008108A1 (en) * 2005-07-07 2007-01-11 Schurig Alma K Unsynchronized beacon location system and method
US20070018813A1 (en) * 2005-07-22 2007-01-25 Liggitt Richard C Electronic identification tag
US7209071B1 (en) 2004-05-07 2007-04-24 Steele Boring System and method for distance measurement
US20070103362A1 (en) * 2000-06-06 2007-05-10 Altratek, Inc. System and method for detection and tracking of targets
US7362656B2 (en) 2002-12-04 2008-04-22 Sonitor Technologies As Ultrasonic locating system
US20080191937A1 (en) * 2007-02-13 2008-08-14 Wherenet Corp. System and method for tracking vehicles and containers
US20080238762A1 (en) * 2007-01-31 2008-10-02 Donald Spyro Gumas System and methods for multistep target detection and parameter estimation
US20080266131A1 (en) * 2007-02-13 2008-10-30 Wherenet Corp. System, apparatus and method for locating and/or tracking assets
EP1996958A1 (en) * 2006-03-23 2008-12-03 RFind Systems, Inc. Wireless asset identification and location
WO2006098791A3 (en) * 2005-03-14 2009-04-09 Mann Alfred E Found Scient Res System and method for locating objects and communicating with the same
US20090102711A1 (en) * 2005-01-19 2009-04-23 Elwell Jr John M Systems and methods for transparency mapping using multipath signals
US20090102707A1 (en) * 2005-01-19 2009-04-23 Elwell Jr John M Systems and methods for transparency mapping using multipath signals
US7535796B2 (en) 2002-04-09 2009-05-19 Sonitor Technologies As System and method for position determination of objects
US7679561B2 (en) 2005-01-19 2010-03-16 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Systems and methods for positioning using multipath signals
US20110018687A1 (en) * 2007-11-13 2011-01-27 Universitetet I Oslo Ultrasound zone location system with high capacity
WO2013166410A3 (en) * 2012-05-04 2014-05-01 Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. Computer-readable media for logical clustering of package data and derived analytics and sharing of sensor information
US8742929B2 (en) 2002-07-09 2014-06-03 Automated Tracking Solutions, Llc Method and apparatus for tracking objects and people
US9052374B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2015-06-09 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for processing positioning signals based on predetermined message data segment
US9830424B2 (en) 2013-09-18 2017-11-28 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Bed/room/patient association systems and methods
US11022421B2 (en) 2016-01-20 2021-06-01 Lucent Medical Systems, Inc. Low-frequency electromagnetic tracking
US11911325B2 (en) 2019-02-26 2024-02-27 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Bed interface for manual location

Families Citing this family (368)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5594786A (en) * 1990-07-27 1997-01-14 Executone Information Systems, Inc. Patient care and communication system
US5465082A (en) * 1990-07-27 1995-11-07 Executone Information Systems, Inc. Apparatus for automating routine communication in a facility
US6958706B2 (en) * 1990-07-27 2005-10-25 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Patient care and communication system
US5822544A (en) * 1990-07-27 1998-10-13 Executone Information Systems, Inc. Patient care and communication system
US5455851A (en) * 1993-07-02 1995-10-03 Executone Information Systems, Inc. System for identifying object locations
US5355506A (en) * 1991-04-29 1994-10-11 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Communication method for controlling and monitoring robotic entities
US5471503A (en) * 1992-12-29 1995-11-28 Apple Computer, Inc. Scanning method for receiving a transmission in a communication system with slow frequency hopping and coding
US5483636A (en) * 1993-02-03 1996-01-09 Texas Instruments Incorporated Automated diagnosis using wafer tracking databases
SE500976C2 (en) * 1993-02-09 1994-10-10 Lmt Data Handelsbolag Method and apparatus for positioning in a system
US5387993A (en) * 1993-06-25 1995-02-07 Precision Tracking Fm, Inc. Method for receiving and transmitting optical data and control information to and from remotely located receivers and transmitters in an optical locator system
US5404374A (en) * 1993-07-12 1995-04-04 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving encoded data using multiple frequency coding
US5548637A (en) * 1993-09-09 1996-08-20 Precision Tracking Fm, Inc. Method and apparatus for locating personnel and objects in response to telephone inquiries
US5404376A (en) * 1993-09-09 1995-04-04 Ericsson-Ge Mobile Communications Inc. Navigation assistance for call handling in mobile telephone systems
US5430441A (en) * 1993-10-12 1995-07-04 Motorola, Inc. Transponding tag and method
US5717955A (en) * 1993-12-03 1998-02-10 Xerox Corporation System for changing device from specialized interface that enables control of subsystem to general interface that performs general purpose computing functions unrelated to the subsystem
US5812865A (en) * 1993-12-03 1998-09-22 Xerox Corporation Specifying and establishing communication data paths between particular media devices in multiple media device computing systems based on context of a user or users
US5493692A (en) * 1993-12-03 1996-02-20 Xerox Corporation Selective delivery of electronic messages in a multiple computer system based on context and environment of a user
US5555376A (en) * 1993-12-03 1996-09-10 Xerox Corporation Method for granting a user request having locational and contextual attributes consistent with user policies for devices having locational attributes consistent with the user request
US5515426A (en) * 1994-02-28 1996-05-07 Executone Information Systems, Inc. Telephone communication system having a locator
JP3116710B2 (en) * 1994-03-18 2000-12-11 株式会社日立製作所 Information terminal system
US5742635A (en) * 1994-05-05 1998-04-21 Sanconix, Inc. Enhanced time of arrival method
US5465286A (en) * 1994-05-24 1995-11-07 Executone Information Systems, Inc. Apparatus for supervising an automatic call distribution telephone system
TW274170B (en) * 1994-06-17 1996-04-11 Terrastar Inc Satellite communication system, receiving antenna & components for use therein
US5745084A (en) * 1994-06-17 1998-04-28 Lusignan; Bruce B. Very small aperture terminal & antenna for use therein
US5572195A (en) * 1994-08-01 1996-11-05 Precision Tracking Fm, Inc. Sensory and control system for local area networks
US5589838A (en) * 1994-09-06 1996-12-31 The Regents Of The University Of California Short range radio locator system
US5606322A (en) * 1994-10-24 1997-02-25 Motorola, Inc. Divergent code generator and method
US5959580A (en) * 1994-11-03 1999-09-28 Ksi Inc. Communications localization system
US5568484A (en) * 1994-12-22 1996-10-22 Matsushita Avionics Systems Corporation Telecommunications system and method for use on commercial aircraft and other vehicles
US5797091A (en) * 1995-03-07 1998-08-18 Xypoint Corporation Personal communication system and method of use
US5742238A (en) * 1995-09-01 1998-04-21 Emtrak, Inc. System for communication between a central controller and items in a factory using infrared light
US5936578A (en) * 1995-12-29 1999-08-10 Lucent Technologies Multipoint-to-point wireless system using directional antennas
US5828693A (en) * 1996-03-21 1998-10-27 Amtech Corporation Spread spectrum frequency hopping reader system
US5774802A (en) 1996-04-10 1998-06-30 Motorola Inc. Apparatus and method for billing in a wireless communication system
US6108555A (en) * 1996-05-17 2000-08-22 Ksi, Inc. Enchanced time difference localization system
US5793630A (en) * 1996-06-14 1998-08-11 Xerox Corporation High precision spatially defined data transfer system
US6128549A (en) * 1996-06-21 2000-10-03 Symbol Technologies, Inc. RF interrogatable processing system
US9134398B2 (en) 1996-09-09 2015-09-15 Tracbeam Llc Wireless location using network centric location estimators
US6236365B1 (en) 1996-09-09 2001-05-22 Tracbeam, Llc Location of a mobile station using a plurality of commercial wireless infrastructures
US7714778B2 (en) 1997-08-20 2010-05-11 Tracbeam Llc Wireless location gateway and applications therefor
WO1998010307A1 (en) 1996-09-09 1998-03-12 Dennis Jay Dupray Location of a mobile station
US7274332B1 (en) 1996-09-09 2007-09-25 Tracbeam Llc Multiple evaluators for evaluation of a purality of conditions
US7903029B2 (en) 1996-09-09 2011-03-08 Tracbeam Llc Wireless location routing applications and architecture therefor
WO1998016849A1 (en) * 1996-10-17 1998-04-23 Pinpoint Corporation Article tracking system
US6353406B1 (en) 1996-10-17 2002-03-05 R.F. Technologies, Inc. Dual mode tracking system
US6812824B1 (en) 1996-10-17 2004-11-02 Rf Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus combining a tracking system and a wireless communication system
US5995046A (en) * 1998-01-30 1999-11-30 Widata Corporation Radio geo-location system with advanced first received wavefront arrival determination
US5920287A (en) * 1997-01-21 1999-07-06 Widata Corporation Radio location system for precisely tracking objects by RF transceiver tags which randomly and repetitively emit wideband identification signals
US6366242B1 (en) 1997-01-21 2002-04-02 Wherenet Corporation Computer workstation tool for displaying performance estimate of tagged object geo-location system for proposed geometry layout of tag transmission readers
US5926133A (en) * 1997-07-21 1999-07-20 Denso Corporation Differentially corrected position location system and method for mobile communication networks
AU1367699A (en) * 1997-11-03 1999-05-24 Arial Systems Corporation Personnel and asset tracking method and apparatus
US7010369B2 (en) 1997-11-07 2006-03-07 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Medical equipment controller
WO1999023990A1 (en) 1997-11-07 1999-05-20 Hill-Rom, Inc. Medical equipment controller
US6204765B1 (en) * 1997-12-23 2001-03-20 Inkrmec Ip Corp. Method of detecting relative direction of motion of a radio frequency (RF) tag
US6329915B1 (en) * 1997-12-31 2001-12-11 Intermec Ip Corp RF Tag having high dielectric constant material
US6138058A (en) * 1998-01-06 2000-10-24 Jenoptik Infab, Inc. Method for electronically tracking containers to avoid misprocessing of contents
US6222440B1 (en) 1998-02-23 2001-04-24 Freshloc Technologies, Inc. Location, identification and telemetry system using strobed signals at predetermined intervals
US6154139A (en) * 1998-04-21 2000-11-28 Versus Technology Method and system for locating subjects within a tracking environment
US6040774A (en) * 1998-05-27 2000-03-21 Sarnoff Corporation Locating system and method employing radio frequency tags
US6104295A (en) * 1998-07-20 2000-08-15 Versus Technology, Inc. Electronic band tag and method of storing ID information therein
US8135413B2 (en) 1998-11-24 2012-03-13 Tracbeam Llc Platform and applications for wireless location and other complex services
US7783299B2 (en) 1999-01-08 2010-08-24 Trueposition, Inc. Advanced triggers for location-based service applications in a wireless location system
US6184829B1 (en) * 1999-01-08 2001-02-06 Trueposition, Inc. Calibration for wireless location system
US6502005B1 (en) 1999-02-12 2002-12-31 Wherenet Corp Elapsed time clock for part call tag-based replenishment system
US6317082B1 (en) * 1999-02-12 2001-11-13 Wherenet Corp Wireless call tag based material replenishment system
EP1212635A1 (en) * 1999-03-03 2002-06-12 RF Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus combining a tracking system and a wireless communication system
US20010056473A1 (en) * 1999-04-26 2001-12-27 Kenneth Arneson Information retrieval system and method
US6700533B1 (en) 1999-05-06 2004-03-02 Rf Technologies, Inc. Asset and personnel tagging system utilizing GPS
EP1181574A4 (en) * 1999-05-14 2004-05-12 Auckland Uniservices Ltd Improvements in and relating to position estimation systems
AU5588000A (en) * 1999-05-19 2000-12-05 Id Systems, Inc. Fully automated vehicle rental system
US7656271B2 (en) * 2002-01-09 2010-02-02 I.D. Systems, Inc. System and method for managing a remotely located asset
US7356494B2 (en) * 1999-05-19 2008-04-08 I.D. Systems, Inc. Robust wireless communications system architecture and asset management applications performed thereon
US6211790B1 (en) 1999-05-19 2001-04-03 Elpas North America, Inc. Infant and parent matching and security system and method of matching infant and parent
WO2001007928A1 (en) * 1999-07-27 2001-02-01 Wherenet Corporation Rgv (reader geometry visualization) tool
US6640246B1 (en) 1999-09-17 2003-10-28 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Integrated computerized materials management system
EP1286735A1 (en) 1999-09-24 2003-03-05 Dennis Jay Dupray Geographically constrained network services
US6751463B1 (en) * 1999-10-04 2004-06-15 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Intelligent queue for information teleservice messages with superceding updates
US6727818B1 (en) 1999-10-29 2004-04-27 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Hygiene monitoring system
WO2001033248A1 (en) * 1999-11-02 2001-05-10 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Mobile communication system
US8073477B2 (en) 2000-04-11 2011-12-06 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Short message distribution center
US7809382B2 (en) * 2000-04-11 2010-10-05 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Short message distribution center
US6512478B1 (en) 1999-12-22 2003-01-28 Rockwell Technologies, Llc Location position system for relay assisted tracking
AU2001228715A1 (en) * 2000-02-02 2001-08-14 Nokia Corporation Positioning
WO2001063883A2 (en) 2000-02-25 2001-08-30 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Prepaid short messaging
US7038584B2 (en) * 2000-03-31 2006-05-02 Ge Medical Systems Information Technologies, Inc. Object location monitoring within buildings
US6958677B1 (en) 2000-03-31 2005-10-25 Ge Medical Systems Information Technologies, Inc. Object location monitoring system
US6529164B1 (en) 2000-03-31 2003-03-04 Ge Medical Systems Information Technologies, Inc. Object location monitoring within buildings
EP1143089A3 (en) * 2000-04-05 2003-08-27 Meritor Light Vehicle Systems, Inc. Method for remote keyless entry based on proximity
US6871215B2 (en) * 2000-04-11 2005-03-22 Telecommunication Systems Inc. Universal mail wireless e-mail reader
US7110773B1 (en) 2000-04-11 2006-09-19 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Mobile activity status tracker
US7522911B2 (en) 2000-04-11 2009-04-21 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Wireless chat automatic status tracking
US7949773B2 (en) * 2000-04-12 2011-05-24 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Wireless internet gateway
US6891811B1 (en) 2000-04-18 2005-05-10 Telecommunication Systems Inc. Short messaging service center mobile-originated to HTTP internet communications
US6373389B1 (en) 2000-04-21 2002-04-16 Usm Systems, Ltd. Event driven information system
US6593885B2 (en) 2000-04-27 2003-07-15 Wherenet Corp Low cost DTOA location processing system based on multiple readers-to-single processor architecture
WO2001084861A1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2001-11-08 Hi-G-Tek Ltd. Apparatus and methods for cellular communication
US20010056508A1 (en) * 2000-05-12 2001-12-27 Kenneth Arneson Event notification system and method
US20030046091A1 (en) * 2000-05-12 2003-03-06 Kenneth Arneson System and method for providing wireless services
US10684350B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2020-06-16 Tracbeam Llc Services and applications for a communications network
US10641861B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2020-05-05 Dennis J. Dupray Services and applications for a communications network
US9875492B2 (en) 2001-05-22 2018-01-23 Dennis J. Dupray Real estate transaction system
US20020036569A1 (en) * 2000-08-14 2002-03-28 Martin Philip John Tag and receiver systems
US7911324B2 (en) * 2001-02-16 2011-03-22 Automotive Technologies International, Inc. Method and system for obtaining information about RFID-equipped objects
US6556942B1 (en) 2000-09-29 2003-04-29 Ut-Battelle, Llc Short range spread-spectrum radiolocation system and method
US6889109B1 (en) * 2000-11-03 2005-05-03 Ford Motor Company Method for maintaining the quality of produced products
EP1336277B1 (en) * 2000-11-14 2011-04-20 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Methods and apparatus for identifying asset location in mobile communication networks
US7519654B1 (en) 2000-11-22 2009-04-14 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Web gateway multi-carrier support
US9084076B2 (en) 2001-02-16 2015-07-14 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Techniques for obtaining information about objects
US7127264B2 (en) * 2001-02-27 2006-10-24 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Mobile originated interactive menus via short messaging services
US7640031B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2009-12-29 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Mobile originated interactive menus via short messaging services
AU2002256048A1 (en) 2001-03-30 2002-10-15 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Hospital bed and network system
US7248933B2 (en) * 2001-05-08 2007-07-24 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Article locating and tracking system
US7242306B2 (en) 2001-05-08 2007-07-10 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Article locating and tracking apparatus and method
US8082096B2 (en) 2001-05-22 2011-12-20 Tracbeam Llc Wireless location routing applications and architecture therefor
CA2443678A1 (en) * 2001-05-25 2002-12-05 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. A waste segregation compliance system
WO2002103645A2 (en) * 2001-06-14 2002-12-27 Rf Code, Inc. Wireless identification system and protocol
AU2002326417A1 (en) * 2001-07-20 2003-03-03 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Badge for a locating and tracking system
US6980111B2 (en) 2001-08-03 2005-12-27 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Medication tracking system
GB0121082D0 (en) * 2001-08-31 2001-10-24 Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv Method of operating a radio station and radio system
US6658260B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2003-12-02 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Inter-carrier short messaging service providing phone number only experience
US6882315B2 (en) * 2001-10-18 2005-04-19 Multispectral Solutions, Inc. Object location system and method
US7853272B2 (en) * 2001-12-21 2010-12-14 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Wireless network tour guide
GB2383708A (en) * 2001-12-31 2003-07-02 Systems Engineering & Assessme Position determination
WO2003063103A1 (en) 2002-01-18 2003-07-31 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Monitoring and tracking of assets by utilizing wireless communications
US20030148812A1 (en) * 2002-02-01 2003-08-07 Paulsen Craig A. Gaming system and gaming method
US6935958B2 (en) * 2002-02-06 2005-08-30 Igt Method and apparatus for machine location
US6843725B2 (en) * 2002-02-06 2005-01-18 Igt Method and apparatus for monitoring or controlling a gaming machine based on gaming machine location
US8918073B2 (en) 2002-03-28 2014-12-23 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Wireless telecommunications location based services scheme selection
US7426380B2 (en) 2002-03-28 2008-09-16 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Location derived presence information
US8290505B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2012-10-16 Telecommunications Systems, Inc. Consequential location derived information
US9154906B2 (en) 2002-03-28 2015-10-06 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Area watcher for wireless network
CN1647119A (en) * 2002-04-25 2005-07-27 赫墨斯信息股份有限公司 Control device for monitoring spatial or mechanical limits of articles or materials of manufacture in a production cycle using transponder technology
US7169052B2 (en) * 2002-08-05 2007-01-30 Igt Personalized gaming apparatus and gaming method
AU2003275297A1 (en) * 2002-09-27 2004-04-23 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Universal communications, monitoring, tracking, and control system for a healthcare facility
US7298275B2 (en) * 2002-09-27 2007-11-20 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Machine associating method and apparatus
US6917290B2 (en) * 2002-10-11 2005-07-12 Itt Manufacturng Enterprises, Inc. Zone detection locator
US6963289B2 (en) * 2002-10-18 2005-11-08 Aeroscout, Ltd. Wireless local area network (WLAN) channel radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag system and method therefor
US7522049B2 (en) * 2002-10-18 2009-04-21 Aeroscout, Ltd. Wireless local area network (WLAN) method and system for presence detection and location finding
GB0225428D0 (en) * 2002-10-31 2002-12-11 Mitel Knowledge Corp Call redirection zones for wireless communications
US20040253964A1 (en) * 2003-06-12 2004-12-16 Yinjun Zhu Mobile based area event handling when currently visited network does not cover area
US20070238455A1 (en) 2006-04-07 2007-10-11 Yinjun Zhu Mobile based area event handling when currently visited network doe not cover area
US6784842B2 (en) * 2003-01-22 2004-08-31 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Method and system for calibrating a location system
US7272456B2 (en) * 2003-01-24 2007-09-18 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Position based machine control in an industrial automation environment
US20040166881A1 (en) * 2003-02-06 2004-08-26 Farchmin David Walter Phased array wireless location method and apparatus
EP2456104A1 (en) 2003-02-10 2012-05-23 Nielsen Media Research, Inc. Methods and apparatus to adaptively gather audience measurement data
US7043316B2 (en) * 2003-02-14 2006-05-09 Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc. Location based programming and data management in an automated environment
US6838992B2 (en) * 2003-03-21 2005-01-04 Versus Technology, Inc. Methods and systems for locating subjects and providing event notification within a tracking environment and badge for use therein
WO2004104619A1 (en) * 2003-05-14 2004-12-02 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Combined locating, tracking and communications system with active radio frequency and infrared id tags
US20050029872A1 (en) * 2003-08-08 2005-02-10 Ehrman Kenneth S. Universal power supply
US20050071498A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 Farchmin David W. Wireless location based automated components
US20070080801A1 (en) * 2003-10-16 2007-04-12 Weismiller Matthew W Universal communications, monitoring, tracking, and control system for a healthcare facility
US7324824B2 (en) * 2003-12-09 2008-01-29 Awarepoint Corporation Wireless network monitoring system
WO2005062066A2 (en) * 2003-10-22 2005-07-07 Awarepoint Corporation Wireless position location and tracking system
US7545326B2 (en) * 2003-10-22 2009-06-09 Awarepoint Corporation Wireless tracking system and method with multipath error mitigation
US7218229B2 (en) * 2003-11-07 2007-05-15 Wherenet Corp Location system and method that achieves time synchronized network performance with nodes divided into separate networks
US7424293B2 (en) 2003-12-02 2008-09-09 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. User plane location based service using message tunneling to support roaming
US7119687B2 (en) * 2003-12-03 2006-10-10 Siemens Technology-To-Business Center, Llc System for tracking object locations using self-tracking tags
EP1692784B1 (en) * 2003-12-09 2016-06-29 Awarepoint Corporation Plug-in network appliance
US7260186B2 (en) 2004-03-23 2007-08-21 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Solutions for voice over internet protocol (VoIP) 911 location services
US20080090546A1 (en) 2006-10-17 2008-04-17 Richard Dickinson Enhanced E911 network access for a call center using session initiation protocol (SIP) messaging
US7903791B2 (en) 2005-06-13 2011-03-08 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Enhanced E911 location information using voice over internet protocol (VoIP)
US20080126535A1 (en) 2006-11-28 2008-05-29 Yinjun Zhu User plane location services over session initiation protocol (SIP)
US6909399B1 (en) * 2003-12-31 2005-06-21 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Location system with calibration monitoring
US8406341B2 (en) 2004-01-23 2013-03-26 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Variable encoding and detection apparatus and methods
US7251535B2 (en) * 2004-02-06 2007-07-31 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Location based diagnostics method and apparatus
US8645569B2 (en) * 2004-03-12 2014-02-04 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Juxtaposition based machine addressing
WO2005094172A2 (en) * 2004-03-30 2005-10-13 Hi-G-Tek Inc. Monitorable locking assemblies
US7152791B2 (en) * 2004-03-30 2006-12-26 Honeywell International, Inc. Identifying the location of an asset
US20050228528A1 (en) * 2004-04-01 2005-10-13 Farchmin David W Location based material handling and processing
US8195205B2 (en) 2004-05-06 2012-06-05 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Gateway application to support use of a single internet address domain for routing messages to multiple multimedia message service centers
US7991411B2 (en) 2004-05-06 2011-08-02 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Method to qualify multimedia message content to enable use of a single internet address domain to send messages to both short message service centers and multimedia message service centers
US7315280B2 (en) * 2004-05-25 2008-01-01 Bae Systems Information And Electronics Systems Integration Inc. Coherent geolocation system
US6933888B1 (en) * 2004-06-14 2005-08-23 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Multi-ship coherent geolocation system
US20060050651A1 (en) * 2004-08-19 2006-03-09 Cyril Brignone Establishing a coordinate system and coordinates for nodes in a network
US8174383B1 (en) 2004-08-26 2012-05-08 Avante International Technology, Inc. System and method for operating a synchronized wireless network
US7342497B2 (en) * 2004-08-26 2008-03-11 Avante International Technology, Inc Object monitoring, locating, and tracking system employing RFID devices
US7839289B2 (en) * 2004-08-26 2010-11-23 Avante International Technology, Inc. Object monitoring, locating, and tracking system and method employing RFID devices
US7319397B2 (en) * 2004-08-26 2008-01-15 Avante International Technology, Inc. RFID device for object monitoring, locating, and tracking
US7423535B2 (en) * 2004-08-26 2008-09-09 Avante International Technology, Inc. Object monitoring, locating, and tracking method employing RFID devices
US7525432B2 (en) * 2004-09-15 2009-04-28 Radarfind Corporation Methods, identification tags and computer program products for automated location and monitoring of mobile devices
US7528716B2 (en) * 2004-09-15 2009-05-05 Radarfind Corporation Methods, location circuits and computer program products for automated location and monitoring of mobile devices
CA2581982C (en) 2004-09-27 2013-06-18 Nielsen Media Research, Inc. Methods and apparatus for using location information to manage spillover in an audience monitoring system
US8294584B2 (en) * 2004-10-12 2012-10-23 Plost Gerald N System, method and implementation for increasing a likelihood of improved hand hygiene in a desirably sanitary environment
WO2006093992A2 (en) * 2005-03-01 2006-09-08 I.D. Systems, Inc. Mobile portal for rfid applications
CN101185347A (en) * 2005-03-01 2008-05-21 I.D.系统公司 Mobile portal for rfid applications
WO2006099612A2 (en) 2005-03-17 2006-09-21 Nielsen Media Research, Inc. Methods and apparatus for using audience member behavior information to determine compliance with audience measurement system usage requirements
US8370054B2 (en) * 2005-03-24 2013-02-05 Google Inc. User location driven identification of service vehicles
US7353034B2 (en) 2005-04-04 2008-04-01 X One, Inc. Location sharing and tracking using mobile phones or other wireless devices
US7710322B1 (en) 2005-05-10 2010-05-04 Multispectral Solutions, Inc. Extensible object location system and method using multiple references
US7430425B2 (en) 2005-05-17 2008-09-30 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Inter-carrier digital message with user data payload service providing phone number only experience
US8913983B2 (en) 2005-05-27 2014-12-16 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Voice over internet protocol (VoIP) E911 metro street address guide (MSAG) validation
US7945026B2 (en) * 2005-05-27 2011-05-17 Telecommunications Systems, Inc. Voice over internet protocol (VoIP) E911 metro street address guide (MSAG) validation
US8660573B2 (en) 2005-07-19 2014-02-25 Telecommunications Systems, Inc. Location service requests throttling
US7548158B2 (en) 2005-08-08 2009-06-16 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. First responder wireless emergency alerting with automatic callback and location triggering
US7411937B2 (en) * 2005-08-09 2008-08-12 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Time synchronization system and method for synchronizing locating units within a communication system using a known external signal
US9282451B2 (en) 2005-09-26 2016-03-08 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Automatic location identification (ALI) service requests steering, connection sharing and protocol translation
US20070073513A1 (en) * 2005-09-29 2007-03-29 Joshua Posamentier Determining RFID tag location
US8467320B2 (en) 2005-10-06 2013-06-18 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Voice over internet protocol (VoIP) multi-user conferencing
US7626951B2 (en) 2005-10-06 2009-12-01 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) location based conferencing
US7907551B2 (en) 2005-10-06 2011-03-15 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Voice over internet protocol (VoIP) location based 911 conferencing
US9161189B2 (en) 2005-10-18 2015-10-13 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Automatic call forwarding to in-vehicle telematics system
US7808385B2 (en) * 2005-10-21 2010-10-05 Patent Category Corp. Interactive clothing system
US7482926B2 (en) * 2005-10-28 2009-01-27 Intermec Ip Corp. System and method of enhancing range in a radio frequency identification system
WO2007064747A1 (en) * 2005-11-29 2007-06-07 Pango Networks Methods and apparatus for active radio frequency identification tags
US9274207B2 (en) 2006-02-01 2016-03-01 Zih Corp. System and method for determining signal source location in wireless local area network
US8150363B2 (en) 2006-02-16 2012-04-03 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Enhanced E911 network access for call centers
US8059789B2 (en) 2006-02-24 2011-11-15 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Automatic location identification (ALI) emergency services pseudo key (ESPK)
EP2011002B1 (en) 2006-03-27 2016-06-22 Nielsen Media Research, Inc. Methods and systems to meter media content presented on a wireless communication device
MX2007015979A (en) 2006-03-31 2009-04-07 Nielsen Media Res Inc Methods, systems, and apparatus for multi-purpose metering.
US7786885B2 (en) * 2006-04-25 2010-08-31 Hrl Laboratories, Llc Event localization within a distributed sensor array
US8208605B2 (en) 2006-05-04 2012-06-26 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Extended efficient usage of emergency services keys
US9519888B2 (en) * 2006-05-08 2016-12-13 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. End use transparent email attachment handling to overcome size and attachment policy barriers
WO2007133503A2 (en) * 2006-05-08 2007-11-22 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Automatically updated instant messaging (im) presence of roaming im user
US8463284B2 (en) 2006-07-17 2013-06-11 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Short messaging system (SMS) proxy communications to enable location based services in wireless devices
US7501945B2 (en) * 2006-07-27 2009-03-10 Lockheed Martin Corporation System and method of simulation
US8099105B2 (en) * 2006-09-19 2012-01-17 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Device based trigger for location push event
US8014726B1 (en) 2006-10-02 2011-09-06 The Nielsen Company (U.S.), Llc Method and system for collecting wireless information transparently and non-intrusively
US8260252B2 (en) 2006-10-02 2012-09-04 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Method and apparatus for collecting information about portable device usage
US9408046B2 (en) 2006-10-03 2016-08-02 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. 911 data messaging
WO2008048610A2 (en) * 2006-10-17 2008-04-24 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Automated location determination to support voip e911 using self-surveying techniques for ad hoc wireless network
US7698770B2 (en) * 2006-10-31 2010-04-20 Resurgent Health & Medical, Llc Automated appendage cleaning apparatus with brush
US7757700B2 (en) 2006-10-31 2010-07-20 Resurgent Health & Medical, Llc Wash chamber for automated appendage-washing apparatus
US7818083B2 (en) * 2006-10-31 2010-10-19 Resurgent Health & Medical, Llc Automated washing system with compliance verification and automated compliance monitoring reporting
US7659824B2 (en) * 2006-10-31 2010-02-09 Resurgent Health & Medical, Llc Sanitizer dispensers with compliance verification
US7966013B2 (en) 2006-11-03 2011-06-21 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Roaming gateway enabling location based services (LBS) roaming for user plane in CDMA networks without requiring use of a mobile positioning center (MPC)
US9600959B2 (en) 2007-01-09 2017-03-21 Cfph, Llp System for managing promotions
US9754444B2 (en) * 2006-12-06 2017-09-05 Cfph, Llc Method and apparatus for advertising on a mobile gaming device
US20080147461A1 (en) * 2006-12-14 2008-06-19 Morris Lee Methods and apparatus to monitor consumer activity
US10885543B1 (en) 2006-12-29 2021-01-05 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Systems and methods to pre-scale media content to facilitate audience measurement
US7667602B2 (en) * 2007-01-19 2010-02-23 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Multi-directional RFID reader for controlling inventory and shelf stock
US20080189132A1 (en) * 2007-02-05 2008-08-07 Matthew Minson Automatic Hospital Bed Accounting System
US8050386B2 (en) 2007-02-12 2011-11-01 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Mobile automatic location identification (ALI) for first responders
US20080221968A1 (en) * 2007-03-07 2008-09-11 Tamara Gaffney Method and system for interacting with users of portable devices
US7986235B2 (en) * 2007-03-23 2011-07-26 Intel Corporation RFID receive-only system
ES2289963B1 (en) * 2007-07-02 2009-05-01 Jvv Grup Montajes Y Desarrollos De Proyectos Electronicos S.L. REMOTE CONTROL MODULE.
US8321556B1 (en) 2007-07-09 2012-11-27 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Method and system for collecting data on a wireless device
WO2009038726A1 (en) 2007-09-17 2009-03-26 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Emergency 911 data messaging
US20090150217A1 (en) 2007-11-02 2009-06-11 Luff Robert A Methods and apparatus to perform consumer surveys
US9130963B2 (en) 2011-04-06 2015-09-08 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Ancillary data support in session initiation protocol (SIP) messaging
US7929530B2 (en) 2007-11-30 2011-04-19 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Ancillary data support in session initiation protocol (SIP) messaging
US9369294B2 (en) 2007-12-14 2016-06-14 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Reverse 911 using multicast session internet protocol (SIP) conferencing of voice over internet protocol (VoIP) users
FR2925169B1 (en) * 2007-12-18 2012-03-09 Commissariat Energie Atomique METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION WITH ULTRA BROADBAND RADIO FREQUENCY SIGNALS.
CA2652731A1 (en) * 2008-02-07 2009-08-07 Mark Iv Industries Corp. Real-time location systems and methods
US9007264B2 (en) * 2008-02-29 2015-04-14 Robert Bosch Gmbh Methods and systems for tracking objects or people within a desired area
US8503991B2 (en) * 2008-04-03 2013-08-06 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to monitor mobile devices
GB0807586D0 (en) 2008-04-26 2008-06-04 Roke Manor Research A multilateration system and method
US8377229B2 (en) 2008-04-29 2013-02-19 Resurgent Health & Medical, Llc Ingress/egress system for hygiene compliance
US8390428B2 (en) * 2008-05-15 2013-03-05 International Business Machines Corporation Identity verification badge and security system
US9288268B2 (en) * 2008-06-30 2016-03-15 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to monitor shoppers in a retail environment
WO2010005576A2 (en) * 2008-07-10 2010-01-14 Radarfind Corporation Rotatable tags for automated location and monitoring of moveable objects and related systems
US7982614B2 (en) * 2008-08-18 2011-07-19 Honeywell International Inc. Method and apparatus for wireless asset tracking using asset tags with motion sensors
US8068587B2 (en) 2008-08-22 2011-11-29 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Nationwide table routing of voice over internet protocol (VOIP) emergency calls
US8954028B2 (en) 2008-09-25 2015-02-10 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Geo-redundant and high reliability commercial mobile alert system (CMAS)
US20100079337A1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2010-04-01 Mitac Technology Corp. Portable electronic device, and system and method for tracking positions of the same
US8712453B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2014-04-29 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Login security with short messaging
US8688517B2 (en) 2009-02-13 2014-04-01 Cfph, Llc Method and apparatus for advertising on a mobile gaming device
WO2010108185A2 (en) 2009-03-20 2010-09-23 Buzby Networks, Llc Real-time network node location system and method
US8239277B2 (en) 2009-03-31 2012-08-07 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Method, medium, and system to monitor shoppers in a retail or commercial establishment
US8213957B2 (en) 2009-04-22 2012-07-03 Trueposition, Inc. Network autonomous wireless location system
US9301191B2 (en) 2013-09-20 2016-03-29 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Quality of service to over the top applications used with VPN
US8867485B2 (en) 2009-05-05 2014-10-21 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Multiple location retrieval function (LRF) network having location continuity
CN102460431B (en) 2009-05-08 2018-01-19 佐科姆有限公司 Behavior and the system and method for context data analysis
CN102461118B (en) 2009-06-11 2016-07-06 松下航空电子公司 For providing the system and method for safety on a mobile platform
US20110050411A1 (en) * 2009-09-01 2011-03-03 Schuman Richard J Integrated healthcare communication and locating system
WO2011035302A1 (en) 2009-09-21 2011-03-24 Checkpoint Systems, Inc. Retail product tracking system, method, and apparatus
US8508367B2 (en) 2009-09-21 2013-08-13 Checkpoint Systems, Inc. Configurable monitoring device
US8378826B2 (en) * 2009-10-02 2013-02-19 Checkpoint Systems, Inc. Key device for monitoring systems
US8280544B2 (en) * 2009-11-02 2012-10-02 Mold Masters (2007) Limited System for use in performance of injection molding operations
US20110106284A1 (en) * 2009-11-02 2011-05-05 Mold-Masters (2007) Limited System for use in performance of injection molding operations
US20110106285A1 (en) * 2009-11-02 2011-05-05 Mold-Masters (2007) Limited System for use in performance of injection molding operations
US20110125513A1 (en) * 2009-11-20 2011-05-26 Versus Technology, Inc. Real-time method and system for controlling healthcare delivery processes within a clinical environment
US9922167B2 (en) * 2009-11-20 2018-03-20 Versus Technology, Inc. Context-aware method and system for facilitating the delivery of healthcare to patients within a clinical environment monitored by real-time locating apparatus
US20110121974A1 (en) * 2009-11-20 2011-05-26 Versus Technology, Inc. Real-time method and system for monitoring hygiene compliance within a tracking environment
US8416072B2 (en) 2009-11-23 2013-04-09 Versus Technology, Inc. Real-time method and system for locating a mobile object or person in a tracking environment while conserving electrical energy in a battery-operated tracking tag associated with the object or person
US8949069B2 (en) * 2009-12-16 2015-02-03 Intel Corporation Position determination based on propagation delay differences of multiple signals received at multiple sensors
US8855101B2 (en) 2010-03-09 2014-10-07 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods, systems, and apparatus to synchronize actions of audio source monitors
US20110221633A1 (en) * 2010-03-11 2011-09-15 Benjamin Bela Schramm Methods and systems for determining the distance between two objects using wirelessly transmitted pulses
SE535102C2 (en) 2010-04-08 2012-04-17 Recco Invest Ab Frequency selective transponder with motion sensor
CN102971214B (en) 2010-04-27 2016-01-13 松下航空电子公司 For connection support system and the method for user interface facilities
WO2011142807A1 (en) 2010-05-10 2011-11-17 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Cell-id translation in a location based system (lbs)
WO2011149884A2 (en) 2010-05-24 2011-12-01 Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products Lp Hand hygiene compliance system
CA2803661C (en) 2010-06-24 2018-11-27 Arbitron Mobile Oy Network server arrangement for processing non-parametric, multi-dimensional, spatial and temporal human behavior or technical observations measured pervasively, and related method for the same
US8514071B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2013-08-20 Versus Technology, Inc. Real-time method and system for locating a mobile object or person in a tracking environment
US8310364B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2012-11-13 Versus Technology, Inc. Real-time method and system for determining and validating location of a relocated mobile object or person in a tracking environment
US9538493B2 (en) 2010-08-23 2017-01-03 Finetrak, Llc Locating a mobile station and applications therefor
US8340685B2 (en) 2010-08-25 2012-12-25 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods, systems and apparatus to generate market segmentation data with anonymous location data
US9672726B2 (en) 2010-11-08 2017-06-06 Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products Lp Hand hygiene compliance monitoring system
CA2825289A1 (en) 2010-12-13 2012-06-21 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Location services gateway server
US8885842B2 (en) 2010-12-14 2014-11-11 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to determine locations of audience members
US8942743B2 (en) 2010-12-17 2015-01-27 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. iALERT enhanced alert manager
US8688087B2 (en) 2010-12-17 2014-04-01 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. N-dimensional affinity confluencer
US8411258B2 (en) * 2010-12-22 2013-04-02 Intel Corporation Systems and methods for determining position using light sources
WO2012087353A1 (en) 2010-12-22 2012-06-28 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Area event handling when current network does not cover target area
WO2012141762A1 (en) 2011-02-25 2012-10-18 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Mobile internet protocol (ip) location
EP2753947B1 (en) * 2011-09-05 2017-10-25 Nokia Technologies Oy Transmitting positioning packets
US9479344B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2016-10-25 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Anonymous voice conversation
US8831556B2 (en) 2011-09-30 2014-09-09 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Unique global identifier header for minimizing prank emergency 911 calls
US8929854B2 (en) 2011-10-27 2015-01-06 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Emergency text messaging
US9313637B2 (en) 2011-12-05 2016-04-12 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Wireless emergency caller profile data delivery over a legacy interface
US8984591B2 (en) 2011-12-16 2015-03-17 Telecommunications Systems, Inc. Authentication via motion of wireless device movement
US9384339B2 (en) 2012-01-13 2016-07-05 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Authenticating cloud computing enabling secure services
US8688174B2 (en) 2012-03-13 2014-04-01 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Integrated, detachable ear bud device for a wireless phone
US9307372B2 (en) 2012-03-26 2016-04-05 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. No responders online
US9544260B2 (en) 2012-03-26 2017-01-10 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Rapid assignment dynamic ownership queue
US9338153B2 (en) 2012-04-11 2016-05-10 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Secure distribution of non-privileged authentication credentials
US9282366B2 (en) 2012-08-13 2016-03-08 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to communicate audience measurement information
US9313638B2 (en) 2012-08-15 2016-04-12 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Device independent caller data access for emergency calls
US9208346B2 (en) 2012-09-05 2015-12-08 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Persona-notitia intellection codifier
US9456301B2 (en) 2012-12-11 2016-09-27 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Efficient prisoner tracking
US9021516B2 (en) 2013-03-01 2015-04-28 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and systems for reducing spillover by measuring a crest factor
US9118960B2 (en) 2013-03-08 2015-08-25 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and systems for reducing spillover by detecting signal distortion
US9219969B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2015-12-22 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and systems for reducing spillover by analyzing sound pressure levels
US9135481B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-09-15 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Method and apparatus pertaining to installation of an RFID-tag reader system
US9191704B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-11-17 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and systems for reducing crediting errors due to spillover using audio codes and/or signatures
US9158950B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-10-13 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Method and apparatus pertaining to use of multiple sessions with RFID tags
JP2016520808A (en) * 2013-03-15 2016-07-14 アイポジ インコーポレイテッドIposi,Inc. Indoor location using packet synchronous receiver array
US8983047B2 (en) 2013-03-20 2015-03-17 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Index of suspicion determination for communications request
US9407317B2 (en) * 2013-04-03 2016-08-02 Umm Al-Qura University Differential ultra-wideband indoor positioning method
US9753137B2 (en) 2013-05-26 2017-09-05 Intel Corporation Apparatus, system and method of communicating positioning information
US10437658B2 (en) 2013-06-06 2019-10-08 Zebra Technologies Corporation Method, apparatus, and computer program product for collecting and displaying sporting event data based on real time data for proximity and movement of objects
US9699278B2 (en) 2013-06-06 2017-07-04 Zih Corp. Modular location tag for a real time location system network
US9517417B2 (en) 2013-06-06 2016-12-13 Zih Corp. Method, apparatus, and computer program product for performance analytics determining participant statistical data and game status data
US9571143B2 (en) 2013-06-06 2017-02-14 Zih Corp. Interference rejection in ultra-wideband real time locating systems
US9715005B2 (en) 2013-06-06 2017-07-25 Zih Corp. Method, apparatus, and computer program product improving real time location systems with multiple location technologies
US10609762B2 (en) 2013-06-06 2020-03-31 Zebra Technologies Corporation Method, apparatus, and computer program product improving backhaul of sensor and other data to real time location system network
US11423464B2 (en) 2013-06-06 2022-08-23 Zebra Technologies Corporation Method, apparatus, and computer program product for enhancement of fan experience based on location data
US9219928B2 (en) 2013-06-25 2015-12-22 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to characterize households with media meter data
US9432115B2 (en) 2013-07-10 2016-08-30 Intel Corporation Apparatus, system and method of communicating positioning transmissions
US9408034B2 (en) 2013-09-09 2016-08-02 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Extended area event for network based proximity discovery
US9516104B2 (en) 2013-09-11 2016-12-06 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Intelligent load balancer enhanced routing
US9479897B2 (en) 2013-10-03 2016-10-25 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. SUPL-WiFi access point controller location based services for WiFi enabled mobile devices
US9408047B2 (en) 2013-10-10 2016-08-02 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Read acknowledgement interoperability for text messaging and IP messaging
US9426525B2 (en) 2013-12-31 2016-08-23 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc. Methods and apparatus to count people in an audience
US10083459B2 (en) 2014-02-11 2018-09-25 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to generate a media rank
US9699499B2 (en) 2014-04-30 2017-07-04 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to measure exposure to streaming media
US9668164B2 (en) 2014-06-05 2017-05-30 Zih Corp. Receiver processor for bandwidth management of a multiple receiver real-time location system (RTLS)
US9626616B2 (en) 2014-06-05 2017-04-18 Zih Corp. Low-profile real-time location system tag
WO2015186044A1 (en) * 2014-06-05 2015-12-10 Zih Corp. Receiver processor for adaptive windowing and high-resolution toa determination in a multiple receiver target location system
GB2541617B (en) 2014-06-05 2021-07-07 Zebra Tech Corp Systems, apparatus and methods for variable rate ultra-wideband communications
US10261169B2 (en) 2014-06-05 2019-04-16 Zebra Technologies Corporation Method for iterative target location in a multiple receiver target location system
US9661455B2 (en) 2014-06-05 2017-05-23 Zih Corp. Method, apparatus, and computer program product for real time location system referencing in physically and radio frequency challenged environments
US20150375083A1 (en) 2014-06-05 2015-12-31 Zih Corp. Method, Apparatus, And Computer Program Product For Enhancement Of Event Visualizations Based On Location Data
US9759803B2 (en) 2014-06-06 2017-09-12 Zih Corp. Method, apparatus, and computer program product for employing a spatial association model in a real time location system
WO2015186043A1 (en) 2014-06-06 2015-12-10 Zih Corp. Method, apparatus, and computer program product improving real time location systems with multiple location technologies
US20160140821A1 (en) * 2014-11-12 2016-05-19 Peyman Moeini System and method for real-time asset localization
US9680583B2 (en) 2015-03-30 2017-06-13 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to report reference media data to multiple data collection facilities
US9924224B2 (en) 2015-04-03 2018-03-20 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to determine a state of a media presentation device
US9848222B2 (en) 2015-07-15 2017-12-19 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to detect spillover
US9773403B2 (en) 2015-07-28 2017-09-26 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Hygiene compliance system
US10607471B2 (en) 2015-10-06 2020-03-31 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Hand hygiene monitoring system with customizable thresholds
US20170180925A1 (en) * 2015-12-22 2017-06-22 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Position Tracking System
WO2017113122A1 (en) * 2015-12-29 2017-07-06 深圳伊艾克斯信息技术有限公司 Three-dimensional location positioning system and method based on beacons and positioning network elements
WO2019143672A1 (en) * 2018-01-16 2019-07-25 Sensormatic Electronics, LLC Systems and methods for self-checkout using rfid motion triggered tags
RU2690526C1 (en) * 2018-06-06 2019-06-04 ООО "НейроСофт" Method of determining object location and device for its implementation
DE102018120103A1 (en) * 2018-08-17 2020-02-20 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Identification device, identification system and method for identifying an object
US10734110B2 (en) 2018-12-05 2020-08-04 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Caregiver locating tag having advanced functionality
US11551537B2 (en) * 2019-04-11 2023-01-10 Nexite Ltd. Wireless dual-mode identification tag
US10892800B1 (en) 2020-01-06 2021-01-12 Nucurrent, Inc. Systems and methods for wireless power transfer including pulse width encoded data communications
US11303165B2 (en) 2020-07-24 2022-04-12 Nucurrent, Inc. Low cost communications demodulation for wireless power receiver system
US11303164B2 (en) 2020-07-24 2022-04-12 Nucurrent, Inc. Low cost communications demodulation for wireless power transmission system
US11277031B1 (en) 2021-02-01 2022-03-15 Nucurrent, Inc. Automatic gain control for communications demodulation in wireless power transmitters
US11431205B2 (en) 2021-02-01 2022-08-30 Nucurrent, Inc. Systems and methods for receiver beaconing in wireless power systems
US11277034B1 (en) 2021-02-01 2022-03-15 Nucurrent, Inc. Systems and methods for receiver beaconing in wireless power systems
US11569694B2 (en) 2021-02-01 2023-01-31 Nucurrent, Inc. Automatic gain control for communications demodulation in wireless power receivers
US11277035B1 (en) 2021-02-01 2022-03-15 Nucurrent, Inc. Automatic gain control for communications demodulation in wireless power transmitters
US11811244B2 (en) * 2021-02-01 2023-11-07 Nucurrent, Inc. Automatic gain control for communications demodulation in wireless power transmitters
US11431204B2 (en) 2021-02-01 2022-08-30 Nucurrent, Inc. Automatic gain control for communications demodulation in wireless power transfer systems
EP4312049A1 (en) * 2022-07-29 2024-01-31 OMRON Corporation Localizing an rfid tag in a monitored zone

Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3518674A (en) * 1969-02-13 1970-06-30 Urban Scient Corp Mobile unit locating system
US3646580A (en) * 1969-07-18 1972-02-29 Raytheon Co Surface vehicle fleet command and control system
US3714573A (en) * 1970-05-06 1973-01-30 Hazeltine Corp Spread-spectrum position monitoring system
US3961323A (en) * 1971-02-22 1976-06-01 American Multi-Lert Corporation Cargo monitor apparatus and method
US4151407A (en) * 1977-04-28 1979-04-24 Texas Instruments Incorporated Low-power, infrared information transmission system
US4275385A (en) * 1979-08-13 1981-06-23 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Infrared personnel locator system
US4601064A (en) * 1983-01-13 1986-07-15 Fisher Berkeley Corporation Communication system
US4739328A (en) * 1986-07-14 1988-04-19 Amtech Corporation System for identifying particular objects
US4818998A (en) * 1986-03-31 1989-04-04 Lo-Jack Corporation Method of and system and apparatus for locating and/or tracking stolen or missing vehicles and the like
US4897661A (en) * 1987-04-10 1990-01-30 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for determining the position of a vehicle
US4906854A (en) * 1987-11-06 1990-03-06 Afga-Gevaert Aktiengesellschaft Processing method and apparatus for exposed and developed film with position sensing
US4908629A (en) * 1986-03-31 1990-03-13 Lo-Jack Corporation Apparatus for locating and/or tracking stolen or missing vehicles and the like
US4914444A (en) * 1987-08-11 1990-04-03 Lightning Location And Protection, Inc. System and method for synchronizing lightning detectors
US4918432A (en) * 1988-09-27 1990-04-17 B. I. Incorporated House arrest monitoring system
US4924211A (en) * 1988-10-28 1990-05-08 Digital Products Corporation Personnel monitoring system
US4942393A (en) * 1988-05-27 1990-07-17 Lectron Products, Inc. Passive keyless entry system
US4990892A (en) * 1989-08-07 1991-02-05 Westcom, A Division Of Westside Communications Of Jacksonville, Inc. Personnel locator system
US5017794A (en) * 1988-03-17 1991-05-21 United Manufacturing Co., Inc. Apparatus and method for varying the timing of a control signal
US5027314A (en) * 1988-03-17 1991-06-25 United Manufacturing Co., Inc. Apparatus and method for position reporting
US5062151A (en) * 1983-01-13 1991-10-29 Fisher Berkeley Corporation Communication system
US5291399A (en) * 1990-07-27 1994-03-01 Executone Information Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for accessing a portable personal database as for a hospital environment

Patent Citations (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3518674A (en) * 1969-02-13 1970-06-30 Urban Scient Corp Mobile unit locating system
US3646580A (en) * 1969-07-18 1972-02-29 Raytheon Co Surface vehicle fleet command and control system
US3714573A (en) * 1970-05-06 1973-01-30 Hazeltine Corp Spread-spectrum position monitoring system
US3961323A (en) * 1971-02-22 1976-06-01 American Multi-Lert Corporation Cargo monitor apparatus and method
US4151407A (en) * 1977-04-28 1979-04-24 Texas Instruments Incorporated Low-power, infrared information transmission system
US4275385A (en) * 1979-08-13 1981-06-23 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Infrared personnel locator system
US4601064A (en) * 1983-01-13 1986-07-15 Fisher Berkeley Corporation Communication system
US5062151A (en) * 1983-01-13 1991-10-29 Fisher Berkeley Corporation Communication system
US4818998A (en) * 1986-03-31 1989-04-04 Lo-Jack Corporation Method of and system and apparatus for locating and/or tracking stolen or missing vehicles and the like
US4908629A (en) * 1986-03-31 1990-03-13 Lo-Jack Corporation Apparatus for locating and/or tracking stolen or missing vehicles and the like
US4739328A (en) * 1986-07-14 1988-04-19 Amtech Corporation System for identifying particular objects
US4897661A (en) * 1987-04-10 1990-01-30 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for determining the position of a vehicle
US4914444A (en) * 1987-08-11 1990-04-03 Lightning Location And Protection, Inc. System and method for synchronizing lightning detectors
US4906854A (en) * 1987-11-06 1990-03-06 Afga-Gevaert Aktiengesellschaft Processing method and apparatus for exposed and developed film with position sensing
US5017794A (en) * 1988-03-17 1991-05-21 United Manufacturing Co., Inc. Apparatus and method for varying the timing of a control signal
US5027314A (en) * 1988-03-17 1991-06-25 United Manufacturing Co., Inc. Apparatus and method for position reporting
US4942393A (en) * 1988-05-27 1990-07-17 Lectron Products, Inc. Passive keyless entry system
US5319364A (en) * 1988-05-27 1994-06-07 Lectron Products, Inc. Passive keyless entry system
US5515036A (en) * 1988-05-27 1996-05-07 Lectron Products, Inc. Passive keyless entry system
US4918432A (en) * 1988-09-27 1990-04-17 B. I. Incorporated House arrest monitoring system
US4924211A (en) * 1988-10-28 1990-05-08 Digital Products Corporation Personnel monitoring system
US4990892A (en) * 1989-08-07 1991-02-05 Westcom, A Division Of Westside Communications Of Jacksonville, Inc. Personnel locator system
US5291399A (en) * 1990-07-27 1994-03-01 Executone Information Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for accessing a portable personal database as for a hospital environment

Non-Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Fisher Berkeley Corporation Ektacom Brochure: Work Smarter with Smartlink. *
Great New Product: Infrared Locator, Teleconnect, Feb., 1986. *
United Identification Systems Corp. Brochure: Infra Com Nurse Emergency Notification System (1989). *
United Identification Systems Corp. Brochure: Infra-Com Nurse Emergency Notification System (1989).
Videotape: United Identification Systems Infra Com with Nurse Matrix (Apr. 1990). *
Videotape: United Identification Systems Infra-Com with Nurse Matrix (Apr. 1990).
Wescom, Inc. Advertisement, No Date. *

Cited By (76)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070103362A1 (en) * 2000-06-06 2007-05-10 Altratek, Inc. System and method for detection and tracking of targets
US20090073028A1 (en) * 2000-06-06 2009-03-19 Orhan Arikan System and method for detection and tracking of targets
US6498585B2 (en) 2000-08-24 2002-12-24 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and apparatus for rapidly estimating the doppler-error and other receiver frequency errors of global positioning system satellite signals weakened by obstructions in the signal path
US6650285B2 (en) 2000-08-24 2003-11-18 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and apparatus for rapidly estimating the doppler-error and other receiver frequency errors of global positioning system satellite signals weakened by obstructions in the signal path
US7589614B2 (en) 2000-11-29 2009-09-15 Ensure Technologies, Inc. Method of allowing access to an electronic device
US20020104012A1 (en) * 2000-11-29 2002-08-01 Ensure Technologies, Inc. Security token and acess point networking
US20050044424A1 (en) * 2000-11-29 2005-02-24 Ensure Technologies, Inc. Method of allowing access to an electronic device
US8190730B2 (en) 2001-03-09 2012-05-29 Consortium P, Inc. Location system and methods
US20020165731A1 (en) * 2001-03-09 2002-11-07 Sentinel Wireless, Llc System and method for performing object association at a tradeshow using a location tracking system
US20020145534A1 (en) * 2001-03-09 2002-10-10 Sentinel Wireless, Llc System and method for performing object association using a location tracking system
US7099895B2 (en) 2001-03-09 2006-08-29 Radianse, Inc. System and method for performing object association using a location tracking system
US20020167417A1 (en) * 2001-05-10 2002-11-14 Welles Kenneth Brakeley Location system using retransmission of identifying information
US6970097B2 (en) 2001-05-10 2005-11-29 Ge Medical Systems Information Technologies, Inc. Location system using retransmission of identifying information
US7154437B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2006-12-26 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for processing positioning signals based on predetermined message data segment
US6628234B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2003-09-30 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for processing positioning signals in a stand-alone mode
US6515620B1 (en) 2001-07-18 2003-02-04 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for processing positioning signals in a geometric mode
US20050035904A1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2005-02-17 Fast Location.Net, Llc, A Texas Corporation Method and system for processing positioning signals in a stand-alone mode
US20070120735A1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2007-05-31 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and System for Processing Positioning Signals Based on Predetermined Message Data Segment
US6882309B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2005-04-19 Fast Location. Net, Llc Method and system for processing positioning signals based on predetermined message data segment
US20100090894A1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2010-04-15 Fast Location Net, Llc Method and System for Processing Positioning Signals Based on Predetermined Message Data Segment
US20040041728A1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2004-03-04 Bromley Patrick G. Method and system for processing positioning signals based on predetermined message data segment
US8102312B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2012-01-24 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for processing positioning signals based on predetermined message data segment
US7633439B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2009-12-15 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for processing positioning signals based on predetermined message data segment
US7057553B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2006-06-06 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for processing positioning signals in a stand-alone mode
US6774841B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2004-08-10 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for processing positioning signals in a geometric mode
US6529160B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2003-03-04 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for determining carrier frequency offsets for positioning signals
US9052374B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2015-06-09 Fast Location.Net, Llc Method and system for processing positioning signals based on predetermined message data segment
US7061381B2 (en) 2002-04-05 2006-06-13 Beezerbug Incorporated Ultrasonic transmitter and receiver systems and products using the same
WO2003087868A2 (en) * 2002-04-05 2003-10-23 Beezerbug Incorporated Ultrasonic transceiver identification tag
US20030189488A1 (en) * 2002-04-05 2003-10-09 Beezerbug Incorporated Ultrasonic transmitter and receiver systems and products using the same
WO2003087868A3 (en) * 2002-04-05 2004-04-08 Beezerbug Inc Ultrasonic transceiver identification tag
US7498946B2 (en) 2002-04-05 2009-03-03 Beezerbug Incorporated Ultrasonic transmitter and receiver systems and products using the same
US7864633B2 (en) 2002-04-09 2011-01-04 Sonitor Technologies As System and method for position determination of objects
US7535796B2 (en) 2002-04-09 2009-05-19 Sonitor Technologies As System and method for position determination of objects
US20090201765A1 (en) * 2002-04-09 2009-08-13 Sonitor Technologies As System and method for position determination of objects
US8842013B2 (en) 2002-07-09 2014-09-23 Automated Tracking Solutions, Llc Method and apparatus for tracking objects and people
US8742929B2 (en) 2002-07-09 2014-06-03 Automated Tracking Solutions, Llc Method and apparatus for tracking objects and people
US9619679B2 (en) 2002-07-09 2017-04-11 Automated Tracking Solutions, Llc Method and apparatus for tracking objects and people
US10496859B2 (en) 2002-07-09 2019-12-03 Automated Tracking Solutions, Llc Method and apparatus for tracking objects and people
US8896449B2 (en) 2002-07-09 2014-11-25 Automated Tracking Solutions, Llc Method and apparatus for tracking objects and people
US8866615B2 (en) 2002-07-09 2014-10-21 Automated Tracking Solutions, Llc Method and apparatus for tracking objects and people
US10152620B2 (en) 2002-07-09 2018-12-11 Automated Tracking Solutions, Llc Method and apparatus for tracking objects and people
US7221701B2 (en) * 2002-08-28 2007-05-22 Altratek, Inc. System and method for CDMA communications
US20040042531A1 (en) * 2002-08-28 2004-03-04 Orhan Arikan System and method for CDMA communications
US7362656B2 (en) 2002-12-04 2008-04-22 Sonitor Technologies As Ultrasonic locating system
US20060013070A1 (en) * 2002-12-04 2006-01-19 Sverre Holm Ultrasonic tracking and locating system
US7352652B2 (en) 2002-12-04 2008-04-01 Sonitor Technologies As Ultrasonic tracking and locating system
US7489935B2 (en) 2003-05-19 2009-02-10 Michigan Technological University Wireless local positioning system
US20040235497A1 (en) * 2003-05-19 2004-11-25 Board Of Control Of Michigan Technological University Wireless local positioning system
US7336563B2 (en) * 2004-01-30 2008-02-26 Sonitor Technologies As Method and system for increased update rate in acoustic positioning
US20050232081A1 (en) * 2004-01-30 2005-10-20 Sverre Holm Method and system for increased update rate in acoustic positioning
US7209071B1 (en) 2004-05-07 2007-04-24 Steele Boring System and method for distance measurement
US20060220851A1 (en) * 2004-08-12 2006-10-05 Wherenet Corp System and method for tracking containers in grounded marine terminal operations
US20060066485A1 (en) * 2004-09-24 2006-03-30 Guohua Min Wireless tracking system based upon phase differences
US7973716B2 (en) 2005-01-19 2011-07-05 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Systems and methods for transparency mapping using multipath signals
US20090102711A1 (en) * 2005-01-19 2009-04-23 Elwell Jr John M Systems and methods for transparency mapping using multipath signals
US7679561B2 (en) 2005-01-19 2010-03-16 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Systems and methods for positioning using multipath signals
US20090102707A1 (en) * 2005-01-19 2009-04-23 Elwell Jr John M Systems and methods for transparency mapping using multipath signals
US8279119B2 (en) 2005-01-19 2012-10-02 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Systems and methods for transparency mapping using multipath signals
WO2006098791A3 (en) * 2005-03-14 2009-04-09 Mann Alfred E Found Scient Res System and method for locating objects and communicating with the same
US20070008108A1 (en) * 2005-07-07 2007-01-11 Schurig Alma K Unsynchronized beacon location system and method
US20070018813A1 (en) * 2005-07-22 2007-01-25 Liggitt Richard C Electronic identification tag
EP1996958A1 (en) * 2006-03-23 2008-12-03 RFind Systems, Inc. Wireless asset identification and location
EP1996958A4 (en) * 2006-03-23 2010-12-29 Rfind Systems Inc Wireless asset identification and location
US20080238762A1 (en) * 2007-01-31 2008-10-02 Donald Spyro Gumas System and methods for multistep target detection and parameter estimation
US9880283B2 (en) 2007-02-13 2018-01-30 Zih Corp. System, apparatus and method for locating and/or tracking assets
US7755541B2 (en) 2007-02-13 2010-07-13 Wherenet Corp. System and method for tracking vehicles and containers
US20080266131A1 (en) * 2007-02-13 2008-10-30 Wherenet Corp. System, apparatus and method for locating and/or tracking assets
US20080191937A1 (en) * 2007-02-13 2008-08-14 Wherenet Corp. System and method for tracking vehicles and containers
US20110018687A1 (en) * 2007-11-13 2011-01-27 Universitetet I Oslo Ultrasound zone location system with high capacity
US8779895B2 (en) * 2007-11-13 2014-07-15 Universitetet I Oslo Ultrasound zone location system with high capacity
WO2013166410A3 (en) * 2012-05-04 2014-05-01 Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. Computer-readable media for logical clustering of package data and derived analytics and sharing of sensor information
US9830424B2 (en) 2013-09-18 2017-11-28 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Bed/room/patient association systems and methods
US11011267B2 (en) 2013-09-18 2021-05-18 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Bed/room/patient association systems and methods
US11022421B2 (en) 2016-01-20 2021-06-01 Lucent Medical Systems, Inc. Low-frequency electromagnetic tracking
US11911325B2 (en) 2019-02-26 2024-02-27 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. Bed interface for manual location

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US5119104A (en) 1992-06-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USRE36791E (en) Location system adapted for use in multipath environments
JP5204067B2 (en) Wireless identification system and protocol
US7286624B2 (en) Two-way RF ranging system and method for local positioning
US8552837B2 (en) Data transmission method and apparatus in RFID and remote sensor systems
US6859485B2 (en) Geolocation system with controllable tags enabled by wireless communications to the tags
US20050162309A1 (en) Method and apparatus for data filtering in a tracking system
WO2000043944A8 (en) Method of interrogating a radio frequency identification device
EP3896600A1 (en) Mitigating adjacent rfid reader interference
GB2335573A (en) An RF transponder identification system and protocol
AU2007229286A1 (en) Wireless asset identification and location
JP2818077B2 (en) Target location system and location method
US4251801A (en) Mobile data communication system
US6535744B1 (en) System for the spatial allocation of at least one transponder to the cells of a detection area, base station, and transponder
CN1979214A (en) Positioning information processing apparatus and method, information processing apparatus and program
US5117504A (en) Communications device with adjustment for temperature dependent signal delays
US20220365201A1 (en) Time-of-flight measurement system and method
KR101952748B1 (en) Apparatus and method for timing synchronization of time division multiple access network node
US3899740A (en) FM Sidetone phase comparison system
JPS62107543A (en) Radio communication equipment
US20080136637A1 (en) Low latency listen before talk triggers
EP0351598B1 (en) Method for reply rate limiting
JPS6029688A (en) Radar equipment
US20050113044A1 (en) Method for controlling the power supply of a mobile data memory, use of said method in an identifacation system having at least one mobile data memory
JPH1066136A (en) Location detecting system
JP2946659B2 (en) Moving object identification system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: FRESHLOC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SERVICE ID, INC.;REEL/FRAME:010742/0329

Effective date: 20000309

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAT HOLDER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS, ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: LTOS); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

SULP Surcharge for late payment

Year of fee payment: 11

RR Request for reexamination filed

Effective date: 20110629

B1 Reexamination certificate first reexamination

Free format text: CLAIMS 48 IS CANCELLED; CLAIMS 1-47 AND 49-75 WERE NOT REEXAMINED