US20070011187A1 - System and method for generating and selecting data mining models for data mining applications - Google Patents

System and method for generating and selecting data mining models for data mining applications Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070011187A1
US20070011187A1 US11/174,697 US17469705A US2007011187A1 US 20070011187 A1 US20070011187 A1 US 20070011187A1 US 17469705 A US17469705 A US 17469705A US 2007011187 A1 US2007011187 A1 US 2007011187A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
data mining
technique
algorithm
data
computing devices
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/174,697
Other versions
US7516152B2 (en
Inventor
Milind Chitgupakar
Mark Ramsey
David Selby
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kyndryl Inc
Original Assignee
International Business Machines Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by International Business Machines Corp filed Critical International Business Machines Corp
Priority to US11/174,697 priority Critical patent/US7516152B2/en
Assigned to INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION reassignment INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CHITGUPAKAR, MILIND, SELBY, DAVID A., RAMSEY, MARK S.
Publication of US20070011187A1 publication Critical patent/US20070011187A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7516152B2 publication Critical patent/US7516152B2/en
Assigned to KYNDRYL, INC. reassignment KYNDRYL, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02Neural networks
    • G06N3/08Learning methods
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F18/00Pattern recognition
    • G06F18/20Analysing
    • G06F18/21Design or setup of recognition systems or techniques; Extraction of features in feature space; Blind source separation
    • G06F18/211Selection of the most significant subset of features
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99932Access augmentation or optimizing
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99933Query processing, i.e. searching
    • Y10S707/99936Pattern matching access
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99937Sorting
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99938Concurrency, e.g. lock management in shared database
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99942Manipulating data structure, e.g. compression, compaction, compilation
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99943Generating database or data structure, e.g. via user interface

Definitions

  • the database system 2 may comprise only computing devices similar to the computing devices 20 . . . 23 (i.e., comprising a single CPU). As a first alternative, the database system 2 may comprise only computing devices similar to the computing devices 24 . . . 25 (i.e., SMP computing devices). As a second alternative, the database system 2 may comprise a combination of computing devices (unlimited number) similar to the computing devices 20 . . . 23 and the computing devices 24 . . . 25 as illustrated in FIG. 1 .
  • the database system 2 illustrated in FIG. 1 comprises a massively parallel processing (MPP) computer system comprising single CPU 5 computing devices (i.e., computing device 20 . . .
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a computer system 90 used for implementing the database system 2 of FIG. 1 for generating and selecting data mining models, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
  • the computer system 90 comprises a processor 91 , an input device 92 coupled to the processor 91 , an output device 93 coupled to the processor 91 , and memory devices 94 and 95 each coupled to the processor 91 .
  • the input device 92 may be, inter alia, a keyboard, a mouse, etc.
  • the output device 93 may be, inter alia, a printer, a plotter, a computer screen, a magnetic tape, a removable hard disk, a floppy disk, etc.

Abstract

A computing system and method for generating and selecting data mining models. The computing system comprises a computer readable medium and computing devices electrically coupled through an interface apparatus. A data mining modeling algorithm is stored on the computer readable medium. Each of the computing devices comprises at least one central processing unit (CPU) and an associated memory device. Each of the associated memory devices comprises a data subset from a plurality of data subsets. A technique is selected for generating a data mining model applied to each of the data subsets. The data mining modeling algorithm is run simultaneously, on each of the computing devices, using the selected technique to generate an associated data mining model on each of the computing devices. A best data mining model from the generated data mining models is determined in accordance with the selected technique.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Technical Field
  • The present invention relates to a system and associated method for selecting a data mining model.
  • 2. Related Art
  • Locating specific data from a large amount of data is typically very time consuming. Therefore there exists a need for a time efficient procedure to locate specific data from a large amount of data.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention provides a data mining method, comprising:
  • providing a computing system comprising a computer readable medium and computing devices electrically coupled through an interface apparatus, wherein a data mining modeling algorithm is stored on said computer readable medium, wherein each of said computing devices comprising at least one central processing unit (CPU) and an associated memory device, wherein data has been divided by the computing system into a plurality of data subsets, wherein each of said associated memory devices comprises a data subset from said plurality of randomly placed data subsets;
  • selecting a technique for generating a data mining model applied to each of said randomly placed data subsets;
  • running simultaneously, on each of said computing devices, said data mining modeling algorithm using said selected technique to generate an associated data mining model on each of said computing devices; and
  • determining, a best data mining model from said generated data mining models in accordance with said selected technique.
  • The present invention provides a computing system comprising a processor coupled to a computer readable medium and computing devices electrically coupled through an interface apparatus, wherein said computer readable medium comprises a data mining modeling algorithm and instructions that when executed by the processor implement a data mining method, wherein each of said computing devices comprising at least one central processing unit (CPU) and an associated memory device, wherein data has been divided by the computing system into a plurality of data subsets, wherein each of said associated memory devices comprises a data subset from said plurality of randomly placed data subsets, said method comprising the computer implemented steps of:
  • selecting a technique for generating a data mining model applied to each of said randomly placed data subsets;
  • running simultaneously, on each of said computing devices, said data mining modeling algorithm using said selected technique to generate an associated data mining model on each of said computing devices; and
  • determining, a best data mining model from said generated data mining models in accordance with said selected technique.
  • The present invention provides a process for integrating computing infrastructure, comprising integrating computer-readable code into a computing system, wherein the code in combination with the computing system comprises a computer readable medium and computing devices electrically coupled through an interface apparatus, wherein a data mining modeling algorithm is stored on said computer readable medium, wherein each of said computing devices comprising at least one central processing unit (CPU) and an associated memory device, wherein data has been divided by the computing system into a plurality of data subsets, wherein each of said associated memory devices comprises a data subset from said plurality of randomly placed data subsets, and wherein the code in combination with the computing system is adapted to implement a method for performing the steps of:
  • selecting a technique for generating a data mining model applied to each of said randomly placed data subsets;
  • running simultaneously, on each of said computing devices, said data mining modeling algorithm using said selected technique to generate an associated data mining model on each of said computing devices; and
  • determining, a best data mining model from said generated data mining models in accordance with said selected technique.
  • The present invention provides a computer program product, comprising a computer usable medium having a computer readable program code embodied therein, said computer readable program code comprising an algorithm adapted to implement a data mining method within a computing system, said computing system comprising a computer readable medium and computing devices electrically coupled through an interface apparatus, wherein a data mining modeling algorithm is stored on said computer readable medium, wherein each of said computing devices comprising at least one central processing unit (CPU) and an associated memory device, wherein data has been divided by the computing system into a plurality of data subsets, wherein each of said associated memory devices comprises a data subset from said plurality of randomly placed data subsets, said method comprising the steps of:
  • selecting a technique for generating a data mining model applied to each of said randomly placed data subsets;
  • running simultaneously, on each of said computing devices, said data mining modeling algorithm using said selected technique to generate an associated data mining model on each of said computing devices; and
  • determining, a best data mining model from said generated data mining models in accordance with said selected technique.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram view of a database system for generating data mining models and determining a best data mining model from the data mining models, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram comprising an algorithm for implementing the database system of FIG. 1 for producing a propensity to lapse data mining model, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a flowchart comprising an algorithm used by database system of FIG. 1 for generating data mining models and selecting a best data mining model, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a computer system used for implementing the database system of FIG. 1 for generating and selecting data mining models, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram view of a database system 2 for generating data mining models and determining a best data mining model from the data mining models, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. The database system 2 may alternatively be a computing system. A data mining model is generated using existing customer data (e.g., customer behavioral data) such as, inter alia, purchasing history, returned-items history, payment history, promotional offers history, demographic data regarding the customer, etc. A data mining model may be used by an entity (e.g., a company offering products or services such as, inter alia, credit cards, consumer products, mortgages, etc.) to predict future customer behavior (i.e., propensity to respond to a product or service offer) based on an analysis of numerous customer attributes (e.g., purchasing history, returned-items history, payment history, promotional offers history, demographic data regarding, etc.) from the past. The accuracy of the prediction is tied to the ability of a data mining professional to generate and test numerous data mining models, potentially using various algorithms, to determine a “best” data mining model having a highest degree of correlation to a desired product offer or service offer with respect to a customer(s). A database system (e.g., database system 2 in FIG. 1) comprises existing customer data (e.g., data 8 in FIG. 1) divided or allocated into individual data subsets (e.g., data subsets 8A . . . 8F in FIG. 1) within individual computing devices or nodes (e.g., computing devices 20 . . . 25 in FIG. 1). The individual data subsets comprise an allocated portion of the total customer data. Each data subset is defined as 1/N multiplied by the total data set, wherein N is the total number of nodes or individual computing devices. For example, a 100 node (i.e., 100 computing device) parallel system would allocate 1/100th of the total data set (e.g., data 8) on each node. The total data may be allocated among the nodes uniformly (as in the previous example), randomly (e.g., using a hash algorithm), or the data may be allocated among the nodes according to a business rule, such as, inter alia, a customer number. Once the total data is allocated and stored across the nodes of the database system, the data subsets are available for access to generate data mining models. The data subsets may be allocated among the nodes in the database system as the data is entered into the database system. A technique is selected for generating data mining models applied to each of the data subsets and determining a “best” data mining model. The technique may comprise any technique including, inter alia, a lift chart technique as defined, infra, a root mean squared technique as defined, infra, etc. A data mining modeling algorithm is applied by a coordinator node (e.g., administrator computing apparatus 29) to the data subsets simultaneously to generate in accordance with the selected technique to generate and compare numerous data mining models. The data mining modeling algorithm may comprise any type of data mining modeling algorithm including, inter alia, a decision tree algorithm, a clustering algorithm, a radial basis function algorithm, a linear regression algorithm, an associations algorithm, and a neural network algorithm, etc. Each of the above mentioned data mining modeling algorithms are defined, infra. An output from the generated data mining models comprises a numerical description of an “expected behavior(s)” for a customer(s). By comparing results of these “expected behaviors” at a coordinator node (e.g., administrator computing apparatus 29) in accordance with the selected technique in the database system, a “best” data mining model may be selected. The “best” data mining model comprises a highest degree of correlation to a desired product or service offer with respect to a customer(s). The database system 2 comprises computing devices 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25, electrically connected to an interface 16. The interface 16 may comprise any type of interface known to a person of ordinary skill in the art including, inter alia, a local area network (LAN), etc. Additionally, the database system 2 comprises an administrator computing apparatus 29 electrically connected to the interface 16. Each of computing devices 20, 21, 22, and 23 comprises a single central processing unit (CPU) 5 and a memory unit 15. Each of computing devices 24 and 25 comprises a plurality of CPUs 5 connected to a memory unit 15 through a bus 7. The computing devices 24 and 25 are symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) computing devices. An SMP computing device is a computing device comprising multiple CPUs to complete individual processes simultaneously. The database system 2 may comprise an unlimited number of computing devices similar to: the computing devices 20 . . . 23, the computing devices 24 . . . 25, or a combination of computing devices similar to the computing devices 20 . . . 23 and the computing devices 24 . . . 25. The database system 2 may comprise only computing devices similar to the computing devices 20 . . . 23 (i.e., comprising a single CPU). As a first alternative, the database system 2 may comprise only computing devices similar to the computing devices 24 . . . 25 (i.e., SMP computing devices). As a second alternative, the database system 2 may comprise a combination of computing devices (unlimited number) similar to the computing devices 20 . . . 23 and the computing devices 24 . . . 25 as illustrated in FIG. 1. The database system 2 illustrated in FIG. 1 comprises a massively parallel processing (MPP) computer system comprising single CPU 5 computing devices (i.e., computing device 20 . . . 23) and SMP computing devices (i.e., computing device 25 . . . 25). An MPP computer system is a computer system that comprises separate CPUs running in parallel (i.e., simultaneously) to execute a single program. The administrator computing apparatus 29 comprises a computer 14, an input device 17, an output device 12, a database managing software application 9, and a data mining modeling algorithm(s) 33. The database managing software application may comprise any type of database manager software including inter alia, DB2 database management system by IBM, etc. The computer 14 may comprise any type of computer known to a person of ordinary skill in the art including, inter alia, a personal computer, a server computer, etc. The input device 17 may comprise any type of input device known to a person of ordinary skill in the art including, inter alia, a keyboard, a computer disc drive, a keypad, a network connection, etc. The output device 12 may comprise any type of output device known to a person of ordinary skill in the art including, inter alia, a monitor, a printer, etc. The administrator computing apparatus 29 may access and send instructions, programs and/or copies of the database managing software application 9 to each of the memory devices 15 within each of the computing devices 20 . . . 23 and 24 . . . 25. Each of the computing devices 20 . . . 23 and 24 . . . 25 may only access their own memory device 15 and may not access each other's memory devices 15. A stream of data 8 is inputted into the administrator computing apparatus 29 through the input device 17. The administrator computing apparatus 29 divides the stream of data 8 into a plurality of data subsets 8A . . . 8F. The stream of data 8 may comprise a steady stream of data. Alternatively, the stream of data 8 may comprise a stream of data inputted through the input device 17 in intervals. The administrator computing apparatus 29, randomly or by use of a business rule, sends each of the the data subsets 8A . . . 8F to a different one of computing devices 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, or 25. A technique is selected for generating data mining models applied to each of the data subsets and determining a “best” data mining model. The technique may comprise any technique including, inter alia, a lift chart technique as defined, infra, a root mean squared technique as defined, infra, etc. A selected data mining modeling algorithm 33 is applied by the administrator computing apparatus 29 to each of data subsets 8A . . . 8F within each of computing devices 20 . . . 23 and 24 . . . 25 to simultaneously generate and compare numerous data mining models in accordance with the selected technique. The data mining modeling algorithm 33 may comprise any type of data mining modeling algorithm including, inter alia, a decision tree algorithm, a clustering algorithm, a radial basis function algorithm, a linear regression algorithm, an association's algorithm, and a neural network algorithm. A decision tree algorithm comprises a method for dividing the data subsets into a tree with an objective of predicting an outcome by using a “divide and conquer” approach. A clustering algorithm comprises placing data subsets into groups otherwise known as clusters whereby all the customers are “similar”. A radial basis function algorithm comprises a method referred to as supervised learning (alternative examples in same a class as supervised learning may be time-series analysis, multivariate analysis, etc.). A linear regression algorithm comprises a method of fitting a line to a set of observations such as to minimize the scatter of the original pattern. An association's algorithm comprises a method used for discovering regularities in a data subset and generally predicts different things. A neural network algorithm comprises a computing method based parallel architecture. Neural networks comprise simple processing elements, a high degree of interconnection, simple scalar messages, and adaptive interaction between elements. The administrator computing apparatus 29 using a selected technique compares each of the generated data mining models to each other and a “best” data mining model is determined. The “best” data mining model comprises a highest degree of correlation to a desired product offer or service offer with respect to a customer(s). The “best” data mining model may be determined using a plurality of techniques including, inter alia, a lift chart technique, a root mean squared technique, etc. A lift chart technique comprises calculating a measure of the effectiveness of a predictive model (i.e., data mining model) as a ratio between results obtained with and without the predictive model. For example, a lift chart technique comprises using a measurement comprising a determination of how much better (or worse) a data mining model predicted results for a given case set would be in comparison to random selection. A lift is typically calculated by dividing a percentage of expected response predicted by the data mining model by the percentage of expected response predicted by a random selection. For example, if a normal density of response to a direct mail campaign for a product offer or service offer is 10 percent, a determination may be made by focusing on a top quartile of the case set predicted to respond to the campaign by the data mining model. The determination comprises a density of response increasing to 30 percent. Therefore the lift would be calculated at 3, or 30/10. A root mean squared technique comprises a special form of error rate for a prediction involving continuous, ordered attributes. The mean-squared error is the measurement of variation between a predicted value and an actual value. Subtracting the two values and squaring the result provides the rate of squared error. The rate of squared error is averaged over all predictions for the same attribute to provide an estimate of variation for a given prediction. The result is squared to ensure that all errors are positive and can be added together when the average is taken. Additionally, the result is squared to weigh widely varying prediction values. For example, if a prediction for unit sales (in thousands) for one store is 50 and the actual unit sales (in thousands) for the store was 65, the mean squared error would be 65−50=15, raised to the power of 2, or 225.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram comprising an algorithm 19 for implementing the database system 2 of FIG. 1 for producing a propensity to lapse data mining model, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. Step 26 comprises a process for building a business understanding with the underlying business issues associated with lapsing one's policy/product in the customer's domain. Step 27 comprises using the information from step 25 to source a set of variables from the existing database/client spreadsheets (i.e., data 8). This is typically undertaken as an iterative process. A key to building a predictive model is finding evidence of attrition within the historical population (i.e., customer database). Step 28 comprises a data preparation phase requiring performing exploratory data analysis on the set of chosen variables and undertaking some necessary mathematical transformations. For example, a number of weeks a policy is in force may be determined by subtracting the current date from the date the policy was in force to calculate the number of weeks. In Step 30, data mining models are generated and evaluated so that the population (i.e., customer data) may be divided into several samples for training purposes. There are two reasons for dividing the population (i.e., customer data) into several samples. A first reason for dividing the population (i.e., customer data) into several samples is to reduce a run time, by reduction in data mining model complexity. A second reason for dividing the population (i.e., customer data) into several samples is to try to unbiased the data samples. Typically a number of attritions for the population are few and therefore the attritions are overloaded by statistics of the portion of the population that may not accept a product or service offer. By choosing smaller populations to compare against each other, more representative data mining models may be generated. Typically, an entity may want to select as many training cases (i.e., samples) as possible when creating a data mining model, but time limitations typically reduce an actual number of training cases selected, thereby ensuring that the training case set (i.e., samples) closely represents the density and distribution of the production case set. A largest possible training case set may be selected to smooth a distribution of training case attributes. The process of creating such a representative set of data, called sampling, is best handled by selecting records completely at random. Such random sampling should provide a truly unbiased view of the data. As a result of step 30, a plurality of data mining models are generated. In step 32, data mining models that have been generated are stored and used for later comparison to each other to select a most effective data mining model (i.e., a “best” data mining model). A “best” data mining model may be selected using a plurality of techniques including, inter alia, a lift chart technique, a root mean squared technique, etc. as described in the description of FIG. 1. In step 34, a “best” data mining model is selected and deployed with respect to a product offer or service offer.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a flowchart comprising an algorithm used by database system 2 of FIG. 1 for generating data mining models and selecting a “best” data mining model, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. In step 35, a data mining modeling algorithm 33 is selected base on a specified criteria and stored on the administrator computing apparatus 29. The data mining modeling algorithm 33 may comprise any type of data mining modeling algorithm including, inter alia, a decision tree algorithm, a clustering algorithm, a radial basis function algorithm, a linear regression algorithm, an associations algorithm, a neural network algorithm, etc. as described and defined in the description of FIG. 1. In step 36, a technique is selected for generating data mining models applied to each of the data subsets 8A . . . 8F and determining a “best” data mining model. The selected techniques may include, inter alia, a lift chart technique, a root mean squared technique, etc. as described and defined in the description of FIG. 1. In step 37, the administrator computing apparatus 29 transmits simultaneously, the data mining modeling algorithm 33 to each of data subsets 8A . . . 8F within each of computing devices 20 . . . 23 and 24 . . . 25. In step 39 the data mining modeling algorithm 33 is run simultaneously, using the selected technique from step 36, on each of data subsets 8A . . . 8F within each of computing devices 20 . . . 23 and 24 . . . 25. In step 42, a plurality of data mining models are simultaneously generated. In step 44, the administrator computing apparatus 29 compares each of the generated data mining models to each other using the selected technique. In step 46, a “best” data mining model is selected. The “best” data mining model comprises a highest degree of correlation to a desired product offer or service offer with respect to a customer(s).
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a computer system 90 used for implementing the database system 2 of FIG. 1 for generating and selecting data mining models, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. The computer system 90 comprises a processor 91, an input device 92 coupled to the processor 91, an output device 93 coupled to the processor 91, and memory devices 94 and 95 each coupled to the processor 91. The input device 92 may be, inter alia, a keyboard, a mouse, etc. The output device 93 may be, inter alia, a printer, a plotter, a computer screen, a magnetic tape, a removable hard disk, a floppy disk, etc. The memory devices 94 and 95 may be, inter alia, a hard disk, a floppy disk, a magnetic tape, an optical storage such as a compact disc (CD) or a digital video disc (DVD), a dynamic random access memory (DRAM), a read-only memory (ROM), etc. The memory device 95 includes a computer code 97. The computer code 97 includes an algorithm for generating and selecting data mining models. The processor 91 executes the computer code 97. The memory device 94 includes input data 96. The input data 96 includes input required by the computer code 97. The output device 93 displays output from the computer code 97. Either or both memory devices 94 and 95 (or one or more additional memory devices not shown in FIG. 4) may comprise the database system 2 of FIG. 1 and may be used as a computer usable medium (or a computer readable medium or a program storage device) having a computer readable program code embodied therein and/or having other data stored therein, wherein the computer readable program code comprises the computer code 97. Generally, a computer program product (or, alternatively, an article of manufacture) of the computer system 90 may comprise said computer usable medium (or said program storage device).
  • Thus the present invention discloses a process for deploying or integrating computing infrastructure, comprising integrating computer-readable code into the computer system 90, wherein the code in combination with the computer system 90 is capable of performing a method used for for generating and selecting data mining models.
  • While FIG. 4 shows the computer system 90 as a particular configuration of hardware and software, any configuration of hardware and software, as would be known to a person of ordinary skill in the art, may be utilized for the purposes stated supra in conjunction with the particular computer system 90 of FIG. 4. For example, the memory devices 94 and 95 may be portions of a single memory device rather than separate memory devices.
  • While embodiments of the present invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, many modifications and changes will become apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to encompass all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.

Claims (28)

1. A data mining method, comprising:
providing a computing system comprising a computer readable medium and computing devices electrically coupled through an interface apparatus, wherein a data mining modeling algorithm is stored on said computer readable medium, wherein each of said computing devices comprising at least one central processing unit (CPU) and an associated memory device, wherein data has been divided by the computing system into a plurality of data subsets, wherein each of said associated memory devices comprises a data subset from said plurality of randomly placed data subsets;
selecting a technique for generating a data mining model applied to each of said randomly placed data subsets;
running simultaneously, on each of said computing devices, said data mining modeling algorithm using said selected technique to generate an associated data mining model on each of said computing devices; and
determining, a best data mining model from said generated data mining models in accordance with said selected technique.
2. The data mining method of claim 1, wherein said selected technique comprises a lift chart technique, and wherein said method further comprises:
determining by said lift chart technique an effectiveness of each of said generated data mining models.
3. The data mining method of claim 1, wherein said selected technique comprises and a root mean squared technique, and wherein said method further comprises:
determining by said root mean squared technique, a rate of error for each of said generated data mining models.
4. The data mining method of claim 1, wherein said data mining modeling algorithm is selected from the group consisting of a decision tree algorithm, a clustering algorithm, a radial basis function algorithm, a linear regression algorithm, an associations algorithm, and a neural network algorithm.
5. The data mining method of claim 1, wherein said interface apparatus is a high speed switching apparatus.
6. The data mining method of claim 1, wherein said computing system comprises a system selected from the group consisting of a massively parallel processing system, a symmetric multiprocessing system, and a combination of a massively parallel processing system and a symmetric multiprocessing system.
7. The data mining method of claim 1, wherein said computing system further comprises a relational database software system.
8. A computing system comprising a processor coupled to a computer readable medium and computing devices electrically coupled through an interface apparatus, wherein said computer readable medium comprises a data mining modeling algorithm and instructions that when executed by the processor implement a data mining method, wherein each of said computing devices comprising at least one central processing unit (CPU) and an associated memory device, wherein data has been divided by the computing system into a plurality of data subsets, wherein each of said associated memory devices comprises a data subset from said plurality of randomly placed data subsets, said method comprising the computer implemented steps of:
selecting a technique for generating a data mining model applied to each of said randomly placed data subsets;
running simultaneously, on each of said computing devices, said data mining modeling algorithm using said selected technique to generate an associated data mining model on each of said computing devices; and
determining, a best data mining model from said generated data mining models in accordance with said selected technique.
9. The computing system of claim 8, wherein said selected technique comprises a lift chart technique, and wherein said method further comprises:
determining by said lift chart technique an effectiveness of each of said generated data mining models.
10. The computing system of claim 8, wherein said selected technique comprises and a root mean squared technique, and wherein said method further comprises:
determining by said root mean squared technique, a rate of error for each of said generated data mining models.
11. The computing system of claim 8, wherein said data mining modeling algorithm is selected from the group consisting of a decision tree algorithm, a clustering algorithm, a radial basis function algorithm, a linear regression algorithm, an associations algorithm, and a neural network algorithm.
12. The computing system of claim 8, wherein said interface apparatus is a high speed switching apparatus.
13. The computing system of claim 8, wherein said computing devices electrically coupled through said interface apparatus is a system selected from the group consisting of a massively parallel processing system, a symmetric multiprocessing system, and a combination of a massively parallel processing system and a symmetric multiprocessing system.
14. The computing system of claim 8, wherein said computing devices electrically coupled through said interface apparatus comprises a relational database software system.
15. A process for integrating computing infrastructure, comprising integrating computer-readable code into a computing system, wherein the code in combination with the computing system comprises a computer readable medium and computing devices electrically coupled through an interface apparatus, wherein a data mining modeling algorithm is stored on said computer readable medium, wherein each of said computing devices comprising at least one central processing unit (CPU) and an associated memory device, wherein data has been divided by the computing system into a plurality of data subsets, wherein each of said associated memory devices comprises a data subset from said plurality of randomly placed data subsets, and wherein the code in combination with the computing system is adapted to implement a method for performing the steps of:
selecting a technique for generating a data mining model applied to each of said randomly placed data subsets;
running simultaneously, on each of said computing devices, said data mining modeling algorithm using said selected technique to generate an associated data mining model on each of said computing devices; and
determining, a best data mining model from said generated data mining models in accordance with said selected technique.
16. The process of claim 15, wherein said selected technique comprises a lift chart technique, and wherein said method further comprises:
determining by said lift chart technique an effectiveness of each of said generated data mining models.
17. The process of claim 15, wherein said selected technique comprises and a root mean squared technique, and wherein said method further comprises:
determining by said root mean squared technique, a rate of error for each of said generated data mining models.
18. The process of claim 15, wherein said data mining modeling algorithm is selected from the group consisting of a decision tree algorithm, a clustering algorithm, a radial basis function algorithm, a linear regression algorithm, an associations algorithm, and a neural network algorithm.
19. The process of claim 15, wherein said interface apparatus is a high speed switching apparatus.
20. The process of claim 15, wherein said computing system is a system selected from the group consisting of a massively parallel processing system, a symmetric multiprocessing system, and a combination of a massively parallel processing system and a symmetric multiprocessing system.
21. The process of claim 15, wherein said computing system comprises a relational database software system.
22. A computer program product, comprising a computer usable medium having a computer readable program code embodied therein, said computer readable program code comprising an algorithm adapted to implement a data mining method within a computing system, said computing system comprising a computer readable medium and computing devices electrically coupled through an interface apparatus, wherein a data mining modeling algorithm is stored on said computer readable medium, wherein each of said computing devices comprising at least one central processing unit (CPU) and an associated memory device, wherein data has been divided by the computing system into a plurality of data subsets, wherein each of said associated memory devices comprises a data subset from said plurality of randomly placed data subsets, said method comprising the steps of:
selecting a technique for generating a data mining model applied to each of said randomly placed data subsets;
running simultaneously, on each of said computing devices, said data mining modeling algorithm using said selected technique to generate an associated data mining model on each of said computing devices; and
determining, a best data mining model from said generated data mining models in accordance with said selected technique.
23. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said selected technique comprises a lift chart technique, and wherein said method further comprises:
determining by said lift chart technique an effectiveness of each of said generated data mining models.
24. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said selected technique comprises and a root mean squared technique, and wherein said method further comprises:
determining by said root mean squared technique, a rate of error for each of said generated data mining models.
25. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said data mining modeling algorithm is selected from the group consisting of a decision tree algorithm, a clustering algorithm, a radial basis function algorithm, a linear regression algorithm, an associations algorithm, and a neural network algorithm.
26. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said interface apparatus is a high speed switching apparatus.
27. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said computing system is a system selected from the group consisting of a massively parallel processing system, a symmetric multiprocessing system, and a combination of a massively parallel processing system and a symmetric multiprocessing system.
28. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said computing system comprises a relational database software system.
US11/174,697 2005-07-05 2005-07-05 System and method for generating and selecting data mining models for data mining applications Active 2026-06-07 US7516152B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/174,697 US7516152B2 (en) 2005-07-05 2005-07-05 System and method for generating and selecting data mining models for data mining applications

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/174,697 US7516152B2 (en) 2005-07-05 2005-07-05 System and method for generating and selecting data mining models for data mining applications

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070011187A1 true US20070011187A1 (en) 2007-01-11
US7516152B2 US7516152B2 (en) 2009-04-07

Family

ID=37619424

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/174,697 Active 2026-06-07 US7516152B2 (en) 2005-07-05 2005-07-05 System and method for generating and selecting data mining models for data mining applications

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US7516152B2 (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080114801A1 (en) * 2006-11-14 2008-05-15 Microsoft Corporation Statistics based database population
US20090177682A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2009-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation Data mining using variable rankings and enhanced visualization methods
WO2010040016A2 (en) 2008-10-02 2010-04-08 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Nickel-gold plateable thick film silver paste, and plating process for low temperature co fired ceramic devices and ltcc devices made therefrom
WO2012037578A2 (en) * 2010-09-17 2012-03-22 Oracle International Corporation Sales prediction and recommendation system
US20130030983A1 (en) * 2011-07-29 2013-01-31 Gerald Fahner Generating optimal strategy for providing offers
US20140006103A1 (en) * 2012-07-02 2014-01-02 Oracle International Corporation Extensibility for sales predictor (spe)
US10129172B1 (en) 2014-11-20 2018-11-13 Auctane, LLC Systems and methods for cloud-based application access to resources
US10521754B2 (en) 2016-03-08 2019-12-31 Auctane, LLC Concatenated shipping documentation processing spawning intelligent generation subprocesses
US10579955B1 (en) * 2015-06-30 2020-03-03 Auctane, LLC Methods and systems for providing multi-carrier/multi-channel/multi-national shipping
US10678591B1 (en) * 2015-09-22 2020-06-09 Adap.Tv, Inc. Systems and methods for optimization of data element utilization using demographic data
US11443342B2 (en) * 2005-12-28 2022-09-13 Deem, Inc. System for resource service provider
US11720908B2 (en) 2009-04-30 2023-08-08 Deem, Inc. System and method for offering, tracking and promoting loyalty rewards

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TW201142630A (en) 2009-12-21 2011-12-01 Ibm Method for training and using a classification model with association rule models
US20150112894A1 (en) * 2013-10-23 2015-04-23 Harish Kumar Lingappa Perspectives for predictive analysis
CN105205052B (en) 2014-05-30 2019-01-25 华为技术有限公司 A kind of data digging method and device
US11276085B2 (en) 2018-06-15 2022-03-15 International Business Machines Corporation Generating customization data configured to customize demonstration of a product to a target audience
US10656923B1 (en) * 2019-07-31 2020-05-19 Capital One Services, Llc Systems for determining regulatory compliance of smart contracts

Citations (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4831582A (en) * 1986-11-07 1989-05-16 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Database access machine for factory automation network
US6035341A (en) * 1996-10-31 2000-03-07 Sensormatic Electronics Corporation Multimedia data analysis in intelligent video information management system
US6189005B1 (en) * 1998-08-21 2001-02-13 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for mining surprising temporal patterns
US6278997B1 (en) * 1999-02-05 2001-08-21 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for constraint-based rule mining in large, dense data-sets
US6430547B1 (en) * 1999-09-22 2002-08-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for integrating spatial analysis and data mining analysis to ascertain relationships between collected samples and geology with remotely sensed data
US20020138492A1 (en) * 2001-03-07 2002-09-26 David Kil Data mining application with improved data mining algorithm selection
US6539378B2 (en) * 1997-11-21 2003-03-25 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method for creating an information closure model
US6553366B1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2003-04-22 Ncr Corporation Analytic logical data model
US20030088565A1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2003-05-08 Insightful Corporation Method and system for mining large data sets
US6611829B1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2003-08-26 Ncr Corporation SQL-based analytic algorithm for association
US6629095B1 (en) * 1997-10-14 2003-09-30 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for integrating data mining into a relational database management system
US6651048B1 (en) * 1999-10-22 2003-11-18 International Business Machines Corporation Interactive mining of most interesting rules with population constraints
US20030217033A1 (en) * 2002-05-17 2003-11-20 Zigmund Sandler Database system and methods
US6675164B2 (en) * 2001-06-08 2004-01-06 The Regents Of The University Of California Parallel object-oriented data mining system
US6687696B2 (en) * 2000-07-26 2004-02-03 Recommind Inc. System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models
US6687695B1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2004-02-03 Ncr Corporation SQL-based analytic algorithms
US6687693B2 (en) * 2000-12-18 2004-02-03 Ncr Corporation Architecture for distributed relational data mining systems
US6718322B1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2004-04-06 Ncr Corporation SQL-based analytic algorithm for rule induction
US6718338B2 (en) * 2001-06-26 2004-04-06 International Business Machines Corporation Storing data mining clustering results in a relational database for querying and reporting
US6772166B1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2004-08-03 Ncr Corporation SQL-based analytic algorithm for clustering
US6775831B1 (en) * 2000-02-11 2004-08-10 Overture Services, Inc. System and method for rapid completion of data processing tasks distributed on a network
US20040177081A1 (en) * 2003-03-03 2004-09-09 Scott Dresden Neural-based internet search engine with fuzzy and learning processes implemented at multiple levels
US20040267729A1 (en) * 2000-03-08 2004-12-30 Accenture Llp Knowledge management tool
US20050050087A1 (en) * 2003-08-29 2005-03-03 Milenova Boriana L. Support vector machines in a relational database management system
US20060064415A1 (en) * 2001-06-15 2006-03-23 Isabelle Guyon Data mining platform for bioinformatics and other knowledge discovery
US20060085422A1 (en) * 2004-10-01 2006-04-20 International Business Machines Corporation Technique for data mining using a web service
US7039654B1 (en) * 2002-09-12 2006-05-02 Asset Trust, Inc. Automated bot development system
US20060136462A1 (en) * 2004-12-16 2006-06-22 Campos Marcos M Data-centric automatic data mining
US20070011188A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selecting a data mining modeling algorithm for data mining applications
US20070011135A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selecting parameters for data mining modeling algorithms in data mining applications

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6947878B2 (en) 2000-12-18 2005-09-20 Ncr Corporation Analysis of retail transactions using gaussian mixture models in a data mining system
US7136850B2 (en) 2002-12-20 2006-11-14 International Business Machines Corporation Self tuning database retrieval optimization using regression functions

Patent Citations (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4831582A (en) * 1986-11-07 1989-05-16 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Database access machine for factory automation network
US6035341A (en) * 1996-10-31 2000-03-07 Sensormatic Electronics Corporation Multimedia data analysis in intelligent video information management system
US6629095B1 (en) * 1997-10-14 2003-09-30 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for integrating data mining into a relational database management system
US6539378B2 (en) * 1997-11-21 2003-03-25 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method for creating an information closure model
US6189005B1 (en) * 1998-08-21 2001-02-13 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for mining surprising temporal patterns
US6611829B1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2003-08-26 Ncr Corporation SQL-based analytic algorithm for association
US6553366B1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2003-04-22 Ncr Corporation Analytic logical data model
US6687695B1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2004-02-03 Ncr Corporation SQL-based analytic algorithms
US6772166B1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2004-08-03 Ncr Corporation SQL-based analytic algorithm for clustering
US6718322B1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2004-04-06 Ncr Corporation SQL-based analytic algorithm for rule induction
US6278997B1 (en) * 1999-02-05 2001-08-21 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for constraint-based rule mining in large, dense data-sets
US6430547B1 (en) * 1999-09-22 2002-08-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for integrating spatial analysis and data mining analysis to ascertain relationships between collected samples and geology with remotely sensed data
US6651048B1 (en) * 1999-10-22 2003-11-18 International Business Machines Corporation Interactive mining of most interesting rules with population constraints
US6775831B1 (en) * 2000-02-11 2004-08-10 Overture Services, Inc. System and method for rapid completion of data processing tasks distributed on a network
US20040267729A1 (en) * 2000-03-08 2004-12-30 Accenture Llp Knowledge management tool
US6687696B2 (en) * 2000-07-26 2004-02-03 Recommind Inc. System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models
US6687693B2 (en) * 2000-12-18 2004-02-03 Ncr Corporation Architecture for distributed relational data mining systems
US20020138492A1 (en) * 2001-03-07 2002-09-26 David Kil Data mining application with improved data mining algorithm selection
US6675164B2 (en) * 2001-06-08 2004-01-06 The Regents Of The University Of California Parallel object-oriented data mining system
US20060064415A1 (en) * 2001-06-15 2006-03-23 Isabelle Guyon Data mining platform for bioinformatics and other knowledge discovery
US6718338B2 (en) * 2001-06-26 2004-04-06 International Business Machines Corporation Storing data mining clustering results in a relational database for querying and reporting
US20030088565A1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2003-05-08 Insightful Corporation Method and system for mining large data sets
US20030217033A1 (en) * 2002-05-17 2003-11-20 Zigmund Sandler Database system and methods
US7039654B1 (en) * 2002-09-12 2006-05-02 Asset Trust, Inc. Automated bot development system
US20040177081A1 (en) * 2003-03-03 2004-09-09 Scott Dresden Neural-based internet search engine with fuzzy and learning processes implemented at multiple levels
US20050050087A1 (en) * 2003-08-29 2005-03-03 Milenova Boriana L. Support vector machines in a relational database management system
US20060085422A1 (en) * 2004-10-01 2006-04-20 International Business Machines Corporation Technique for data mining using a web service
US20060136462A1 (en) * 2004-12-16 2006-06-22 Campos Marcos M Data-centric automatic data mining
US20070011188A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selecting a data mining modeling algorithm for data mining applications
US20070011135A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selecting parameters for data mining modeling algorithms in data mining applications

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11443342B2 (en) * 2005-12-28 2022-09-13 Deem, Inc. System for resource service provider
US20080114801A1 (en) * 2006-11-14 2008-05-15 Microsoft Corporation Statistics based database population
US7933932B2 (en) * 2006-11-14 2011-04-26 Microsoft Corporation Statistics based database population
US20090177682A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2009-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation Data mining using variable rankings and enhanced visualization methods
US7895168B2 (en) 2008-01-09 2011-02-22 International Business Machines Corporation Data mining using variable rankings and enhanced visualization methods
WO2010040016A2 (en) 2008-10-02 2010-04-08 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Nickel-gold plateable thick film silver paste, and plating process for low temperature co fired ceramic devices and ltcc devices made therefrom
US11720908B2 (en) 2009-04-30 2023-08-08 Deem, Inc. System and method for offering, tracking and promoting loyalty rewards
WO2012037578A2 (en) * 2010-09-17 2012-03-22 Oracle International Corporation Sales prediction and recommendation system
WO2012037578A3 (en) * 2010-09-17 2012-08-02 Oracle International Corporation Sales prediction and recommendation system
US20120278091A1 (en) * 2010-09-17 2012-11-01 Oracle International Corporation Sales prediction and recommendation system
US11250499B2 (en) * 2011-07-29 2022-02-15 Fair Isaac Corporation Generating optimal strategy for providing offers
US20150332320A1 (en) * 2011-07-29 2015-11-19 Fair Isaac Corporation Generating optimal strategy for providing offers
US20130030983A1 (en) * 2011-07-29 2013-01-31 Gerald Fahner Generating optimal strategy for providing offers
US20220198555A1 (en) * 2011-07-29 2022-06-23 Fair Isaac Corporation Generating optimal strategy for providing offers
US9953331B2 (en) 2012-07-02 2018-04-24 Oracle International Corporation Extensibility for sales predictor (SPE)
US9508083B2 (en) * 2012-07-02 2016-11-29 Oracle International Corporation Extensibility for sales predictor (SPE)
US20140006103A1 (en) * 2012-07-02 2014-01-02 Oracle International Corporation Extensibility for sales predictor (spe)
US11563694B1 (en) 2014-11-20 2023-01-24 Auctane, LLC Systems and methods for cloud-based application access to resources of local hosts by arbitrating access using local host agent applications
US10129172B1 (en) 2014-11-20 2018-11-13 Auctane, LLC Systems and methods for cloud-based application access to resources
US11107029B1 (en) 2014-11-20 2021-08-31 Auctane, LLC Systems and methods implementing automated shipment status tracking
US11157331B1 (en) 2014-11-20 2021-10-26 Auctane, LLC Systems and methods for multiuser data concurrency and data object assignment
US11943151B1 (en) 2014-11-20 2024-03-26 Auctane, LLC Systems and methods for controlling cloud-based application access to resources via a user agent client application
US11887040B1 (en) 2014-11-20 2024-01-30 Auctane, LLC Systems and methods implementing automated shipment status tracking
US11095572B1 (en) 2014-11-20 2021-08-17 Auctane, LLC Systems and methods for providing cloud-based applications access to resources local to user devices
US10574587B1 (en) 2014-11-20 2020-02-25 Auctane, LLC Systems and methods for cloud-based application access to resources
US10579955B1 (en) * 2015-06-30 2020-03-03 Auctane, LLC Methods and systems for providing multi-carrier/multi-channel/multi-national shipping
US11416297B1 (en) 2015-09-22 2022-08-16 Adap.Tv, Inc. Systems and methods for optimization of data element utilization using demographic data
US10678591B1 (en) * 2015-09-22 2020-06-09 Adap.Tv, Inc. Systems and methods for optimization of data element utilization using demographic data
US11574280B1 (en) 2016-03-08 2023-02-07 Auctane, LLC Concatenated shipping documentation processing spawning intelligent generation subprocesses
US10521754B2 (en) 2016-03-08 2019-12-31 Auctane, LLC Concatenated shipping documentation processing spawning intelligent generation subprocesses
US11282025B1 (en) 2016-03-08 2022-03-22 Auctane, LLC Concatenated shipping documentation processing spawning intelligent generation subprocesses

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7516152B2 (en) 2009-04-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7509337B2 (en) System and method for selecting parameters for data mining modeling algorithms in data mining applications
US7516152B2 (en) System and method for generating and selecting data mining models for data mining applications
US7512626B2 (en) System and method for selecting a data mining modeling algorithm for data mining applications
Shapi et al. Energy consumption prediction by using machine learning for smart building: Case study in Malaysia
Dhote et al. Hybrid geometric sampling and AdaBoost based deep learning approach for data imbalance in E-commerce
Osei-Bryson Evaluation of decision trees: a multi-criteria approach
US9489627B2 (en) Hybrid clustering for data analytics
US20070033227A1 (en) System and method for rescoring names in mailing list
US20120278091A1 (en) Sales prediction and recommendation system
US20090240644A1 (en) Data processing method for controlling a network
US11928616B2 (en) Method and system for hierarchical forecasting
Torres et al. Self-adaptive fuzzy QoS-driven web service discovery
Andrews et al. Recovering and profiling the true segmentation structure in markets: an empirical investigation
US10832262B2 (en) Modeling consumer activity
Long et al. A new approach for construction of geodemographic segmentation model and prediction analysis
Scriney et al. Predicting customer churn for insurance data
US8285583B2 (en) Contact stream optimization using FEC and CC constraints
Gomes et al. Mechanism for measuring system complexity applying sensitivity analysis
Kumar et al. Empirical validation of structural metrics for predicting understandability of conceptual schemas for data warehouse
US20160307146A1 (en) Rule compression in mean field system
Gupta et al. Survey on stock price forecasting using regression analysis
Teng et al. Response model based on weighted bagging GMDH
Kent Rethinking data analysis-part two: Some alternatives to frequentist approaches
Díaz et al. Some experiences applying fuzzy logic to economics
Sung et al. Forecasting association rules using existing data sets

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHITGUPAKAR, MILIND;RAMSEY, MARK S.;SELBY, DAVID A.;REEL/FRAME:016549/0280;SIGNING DATES FROM 20050608 TO 20050619

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

SULP Surcharge for late payment
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: 11.5 YR SURCHARGE- LATE PMT W/IN 6 MO, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1556); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: KYNDRYL, INC., NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:057885/0644

Effective date: 20210930