US20010035837A1 - System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array - Google Patents

System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20010035837A1
US20010035837A1 US09/767,131 US76713101A US2001035837A1 US 20010035837 A1 US20010035837 A1 US 20010035837A1 US 76713101 A US76713101 A US 76713101A US 2001035837 A1 US2001035837 A1 US 2001035837A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
uwb
radar
signal returns
processor
correspond
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US09/767,131
Other versions
US6400307B2 (en
Inventor
Larry Fullerton
James Richards
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Humatics Corp
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US09/767,131 priority Critical patent/US6400307B2/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of US20010035837A1 publication Critical patent/US20010035837A1/en
Priority to US10/131,598 priority patent/US6573857B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6400307B2 publication Critical patent/US6400307B2/en
Priority to US10/449,602 priority patent/US6710736B2/en
Priority to US10/806,131 priority patent/US7358888B2/en
Priority to US11/140,535 priority patent/US7649925B2/en
Priority to US11/980,529 priority patent/US7873099B2/en
Priority to US11/980,408 priority patent/US7417581B2/en
Priority to US11/980,739 priority patent/US7592944B2/en
Assigned to TDC ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC. reassignment TDC ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TIME DOMAIN CORPORATION
Assigned to TIME DOMAIN CORPORATION reassignment TIME DOMAIN CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: RICHARDS, JAMES L, FULLERTON, LARRY W
Assigned to HUMATICS CORPORATION reassignment HUMATICS CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TDC ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC.
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/88Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S13/887Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for detection of concealed objects, e.g. contraband or weapons
    • G01S13/888Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for detection of concealed objects, e.g. contraband or weapons through wall detection
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/02Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
    • G01S13/0209Systems with very large relative bandwidth, i.e. larger than 10 %, e.g. baseband, pulse, carrier-free, ultrawideband
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/02Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
    • G01S13/04Systems determining presence of a target
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/02Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
    • G01S13/50Systems of measurement based on relative movement of target
    • G01S13/52Discriminating between fixed and moving objects or between objects moving at different speeds
    • G01S13/56Discriminating between fixed and moving objects or between objects moving at different speeds for presence detection
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/87Combinations of radar systems, e.g. primary radar and secondary radar
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/87Combinations of radar systems, e.g. primary radar and secondary radar
    • G01S13/878Combination of several spaced transmitters or receivers of known location for determining the position of a transponder or a reflector
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/88Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S13/89Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/003Transmission of data between radar, sonar or lidar systems and remote stations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/40Means for monitoring or calibrating
    • G01S7/4004Means for monitoring or calibrating of parts of a radar system
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/16Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid
    • G08B13/1609Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid using active vibration detection systems
    • G08B13/1618Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid using active vibration detection systems using ultrasonic detection means
    • G08B13/1636Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid using active vibration detection systems using ultrasonic detection means using pulse-type detection circuits
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/88Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to radar motion detection, and more particularly to using a sparse array of time modulated ultra wideband radars for highly selective intrusion detection.
  • selectivity refers to an intrusion detection system's ability to distinguish movement on some basis, such as where the movement is occurring, how fast an object is moving, or the path that an object is moving along.
  • detection systems that are more selective will likely suffer fewer false alarms because threatening movement can be more precisely defined and distinguished from movement defined as benign.
  • What is defined as threatening and benign will vary by the particular environment in which the system operates. For instance, in a home environment, threatening movement could be defined as movement around the outside perimeter of the house, while movement inside the house is defined as benign. Therefore, an intruder approaching a door or window from the outside would trigger the alarm, whereas a child opening a bedroom door would not.
  • the present invention is directed to a system and method for highly selective intrusion detection using a sparse array of time modulated ultra wideband (TM-UWB) radars.
  • TM-UWB radars emit very short RF pulses of low duty cycle approaching Gaussian monocycle pulses with a tightly controlled pulse-to-pulse interval.
  • Two or more of these TM-UWB radars are arranged in a sparse array (i.e., they are spaced at intervals of greater than one quarter wavelength), preferably around the perimeter of a building.
  • Each TM-UWB radar transmits ultra wideband pulses that illuminate the building and the surrounding area.
  • One or more of the radars receives signal returns, and the signal return data is processed to determine, among other things, whether an alarm condition has been triggered.
  • UWB ultra wideband
  • UWB refers to very short RF pulses of low duty cycle ideally approaching a Gaussian Monocycle. Typically these pulses have a relative bandwidth (i.e., signal bandwidth/center frequency) which is greater than 25%.
  • the ultra wideband nature of these pulses improves both angle and range resolution, which results in improved performance (e.g., greater selectivity, more sensitive motion detection).
  • Another advantage of the current invention is that high resolution radar images are formed which give an accurate picture of the inside of the building and the surrounding area.
  • the current invention uses this image to, among other things, detect motion in a highly selective manner and to track moving objects within the building and the surrounding area.
  • High resolution radar images are possible because the TM-UWB radars positioned around the perimeter of the building form a sparse array capable of achieving high angular resolution.
  • Angular resolution is a function of the width of the TM-UWB radar array, i.e., the wider the array, the greater the angular resolution.
  • Conventional narrowband radars arranged in a sparse array suffer off-axis ambiguities, and are therefore not practical.
  • the UWB pulses transmitted by the TM-UWB radars are sufficiently short in duration (with very few sidelobes) that the radars can be used in a sparse array configuration without off-axis ambiguities. Furthermore, range ambiguities are cured by time-encoding the sequence of transmitted TM-UWB pulses.
  • Another advantage of the current invention is that highly selective motion detection is possible.
  • motion can be distinguished based on criteria appropriate to the environment in which the intrusion detection system operates.
  • home security systems according to the present invention can distinguish outside movement around doors and windows from movement inside the house.
  • business security systems can distinguish movement in an unsecured portion of the building from movement in a secured portion. This selectivity can result in lower false alarm rates.
  • Another advantage of the current invention is that high angular resolution may be achieved at a low center frequency. Because the transmitted UWB pulses have a large relative bandwidth, and because the radar array is wide, a lower center frequency can be maintained and still achieve a high angular resolution. Operating at a lower center frequency relaxes the timing requirements of the system, which makes it easier to achieve synchronization between the radars, and results in less complex, less expensive implementations. A low center frequency also results in UWB pulses that are able to better penetrate lossy materials and withstand weather effects.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an example building environment within which the present invention can be used
  • FIG. 2 depicts an intrusion detection system
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart that describes the operation of the intrusion detection system
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart that describes the generation of radar images
  • FIG. 5 depicts the intrusion detection system operating in a first mode including back scattering at each sensor and forward scattering;
  • FIG. 6 depicts the intrusion detection system operating in a second mode including back scattering at one sensor and forward scattering;
  • FIG. 7 depicts the intrusion detection system operating in a third mode including back scattering only
  • FIG. 8 depicts an imaging area within an example building environment
  • FIG. 9 is a flowchart that describes the generation of a radar image
  • FIG. 10 depicts example reflectograms for four sensors
  • FIG. 11 is a flowchart that describes processing the radar images to determine whether an alarm condition has been triggered
  • FIG. 12A depicts an example clutter map
  • FIG. 12B depicts an example radar image with a moving target
  • FIG. 12C depicts an example differential map, calculated as the difference between the clutter map of FIG. 12A and the radar image of FIG. 12B;
  • FIG. 13 depicts a preferred calibration of the home intrusion system.
  • the present invention is directed to a system and method for highly selective intrusion detection using a sparse array of TM-UWB radars.
  • TM-UWB or impulse radio and radar technology was first fully described in a series of patents, including U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,641,317 (issued Feb. 3, 1987), 4,743,906 (issued May 10, 1988), 4,813,057 (issued Mar. 14, 1989), 4,979,186 (issued Dec. 18, 1990) and 5,363,108 (issued Nov. 8, 1994) to Larry W. Fullerton.
  • a second generation of TM-UWB patents include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,677,927 (issued Oct. 14, 1997), 5,687,169 (issued Nov. 11, 1997) and 5,832,035 (issued Nov. 3,1998) to Fullerton et. al. These patent documents are incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a building environment 100 within which the present invention is used.
  • the present invention includes two or more sensors 102 .
  • four sensors 102 ( 102 A, 102 B, 102 C, and 102 D, as shown in FIG. 1) are located around the perimeter of a building. Using more than four sensors 102 will further reduce the false alarm rate.
  • the sensors 102 communicate with each other via a communication pathway 104 . Though only a single communication pathway 104 is shown, each sensor 102 can communicate with one or more of the other sensors 102 .
  • the example building depicted in FIG. 1 includes perimeter (outside) walls 106 , inside walls 112 , doors 110 , and windows 108 .
  • the areas in and around the building are conveniently divided into inside 114 and outside 116 .
  • FIG. 1 is only a simple example, and that the concepts described herein apply equally well to any arbitrarily shaped building, with any configuration of doors, windows, interior walls, and furnishings.
  • One of the primary objects of the present invention is to detect movement of objects in and around a perimeter, such as outside walls of a building.
  • a perimeter may alternatively be defined as two boundaries to allow for noise and clutter variations.
  • the perimeter may be defined as an inside and outside boundary separated by some distance (e.g. 2 ft). An object on the outside would have to cross the inside boundary to trigger an entry alarm; whereas, an object on the inside would have to cross the outside boundary to trigger an exit alarm.
  • FIG. 2 depicts the components of the present invention in greater detail, referred to collectively as an intrusion detection system 200 .
  • Each sensor 102 preferably includes a TM-UWB radar 202 , and a wireless link 204 .
  • the sensors 102 communicate with a processor 206 that is responsible for processing the data received by the sensors and determining whether an alarm condition has been met. Note that, for purposes of clarity, only two sensors 102 (A and B) are depicted in FIG. 2.
  • intrusion detection system 200 includes two or more sensors 102 .
  • TM-UWB radar 202 is preferably implemented as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,743,906, and 5,363,108, incorporated by reference above. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that the concepts described herein apply equally well to other radars that transmit time modulated UWB pulses.
  • TM-UWB radars 202 transmit UWB pulses and at least one receives signal returns, depending on the particular mode of operation (described below).
  • Each TM-UWB radar 202 can utilize a single antenna element 208 for both transmission and reception, separate antenna elements for transmission and reception, or even an array of antenna elements for transmission and reception, including phased arrays of antennas.
  • Those skilled in the art will recognize that the number and type of antenna elements will vary based on the particular application and desired transmission characteristics.
  • TM-UWB radar 202 preferably operates with a center frequency between 1 GHz and 3 GHz, and a pulse repetition rate of 1.25 MHZ. Other center frequencies are possible, though hydrometer effects introduce problems around 10 GHz and above. Similarly, the pulse repetition rate will vary based on the particular embodiment. Note that if the time modulation of the UWB pulses includes a random component, pseudo-random noise (rather than true noise) is used so that the noise sequence can be reproduced at the other radars.
  • pseudo-random noise (rather than true noise) is used so that the noise sequence can be reproduced at the other radars.
  • Sensors 102 placed along the perimeter of a building will clearly be separated by more than a quarter wavelength at these center frequencies.
  • the sensors therefore form a sparse array.
  • Sparse arrays of TM-UWB radars are discussed in detail in commonly owned, co-pending U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. ______ (attorney docket 1659.0670000), filed the same day of the present application, Jun. 14, 1999, entitled “Wide Area Time Domain Radar Array,” which has been incorporated by reference.
  • Sensors 102 are preferably packaged for convenient installation in a conventional wall electrical socket, securely fastened such that it cannot easily be removed.
  • three-dimensional images may be obtained by ensuring that all the sensors 102 do not occupy the same horizontal plane, i.e., at least one sensor 102 occupies a horizontal plane different from the other sensors 102 .
  • Processor 206 can be implemented using many different configurations of computer hardware and software, as is well known to those skilled in the art. Each particular application will dictate the processing needs of the system, size requirements, memory requirements, and other implementational details. Processor 206 can be physically located at any convenient location. Processor 206 can be included in the same packaging with a sensor 102 , or close enough to a sensor such that data may be transferred between processor 206 and the nearby sensor via a cable. Alternatively, processor 206 can be physically distant from all sensor 102 and communicate with one or more of them wirelessly.
  • Communication pathway 104 represents a wire or wireless transmission medium.
  • sensors 102 communicate with each other via a wireless link, wherein communication pathway 104 represents electromagnetic waves propagating through the environment.
  • communication pathway 104 can be implemented as a cable (e.g., coaxial cable, optical fibre) connecting the radars.
  • Wireless links 204 provide for wireless communication between sensors 102 via communication pathway 104 .
  • Wireless links can be implemented as any number of conventional devices known to those skilled in the art, depending upon the bandwidth required by the particular application.
  • wireless link 204 is preferably implemented as a TM-UWB radio, as described in many of the above cited patents and applications.
  • data transfers are accomplished using subcarrier modulation as described in the '927 patent, incorporated by reference above.
  • a single TM-UWB radar can be configured to perform the functions of wireless link 204 and TM-UWB radar 202 .
  • a single TM-UWB radar is used at each sensor 102 to transmit UWB radar pulses and communicate wirelessly with other sensors 102 .
  • Combining these functions into a single unit results in less expensive implementations.
  • synchronization between the radars is achieved without requiring a separate synchronization signal.
  • wireless links 204 are unnecessary for those embodiments employing a cable as communication pathway 104 .
  • Wireless links 204 are responsible for, inter alia, transmitting scattering data received by their associated radars 202 , and exchanging synchronization information when forward scattering data is being taken.
  • the bandwidth requirements for wireless links 204 depend upon the types of data analysis performed by processor 206 , the rate at which TM-UWB radar 202 transmits UWB pulses and various other factors.
  • Wireless links 204 can also be either bidirectional or simplex, depending upon the requirements of the application. Those skilled in the art will recognize the cost to benefit tradeoff associated with conventional wireless implementations. Other implementations are discussed below.
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart that describes the operation of the current invention. This section provides an overview of the operation. Each step is then described in detail in the following sections.
  • step 302 intrusion detection system 200 is calibrated.
  • Calibration refers to, among other things, identifying the positions of the various sensors 102 and one or more security zones.
  • a security zone as described below, is an area in which certain movement could trigger an alarm condition.
  • the calibration of step 302 is performed before intrusion detection system 200 begins monitoring building environment 100 . Further details regarding calibration are provided after detailed discussions of the next two steps.
  • a radar image is generated by the operation of intrusion detection system 200 .
  • the sensors 102 transmit UWB pulses, preferably in a omnidirectional manner, and then receive the reflected energy, referred to herein as signal returns or signal return data.
  • Processor 206 then creates a radar image based on the signal return data collected by all sensors 102 .
  • processor 206 determines whether an alarm condition has been met. This determination is based on the current radar image, and in many cases, on past radar images as well. Intrusion detection system 200 triggers various alarms in the event that an alarm condition is met, such as lights, sirens, and calls to emergency personnel.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart that describes step 304 in greater detail.
  • flow proceeds to step 404 only for those embodiments that include forward scattering measurements.
  • radars 202 are synchronized, as described in detail below. Skilled artisans will recognize that this synchronization allows for useful analysis of the scattering data.
  • each of the radars 202 transmits UWB pulses, preferably in an omnidirectional fashion, radiating the pulsed energy in all directions.
  • step 408 signal returns are received by at least one radar 202 , depending upon the mode of operation.
  • Intrusion detection system 200 preferably operates in three different modes of operation. In all three modes, each TM-UWB radar 202 transmits UWB pulses. The different modes vary based on which radars 202 are configured to receive signal returns, and whether the radars are synchronized for forward scattering measurements.
  • FIG. 5 depicts intrusion detection system 200 operating in a first mode. Again, for purposes of clarity, only two sensors are depicted ( 102 A and 102 B) and a reflective body 502 .
  • Reflective body 502 represents any object, either inside 114 or outside 116 , that reflects a portion of the transmitted pulse energy.
  • both TM-UWB radars 202 transmit UWB pulses and receive the corresponding signal returns reflecting off reflective body 502 . This process is known to those skilled in the art as back scattering, or mono-static operation.
  • the back scattering data from each radar 202 is passed to processor 206 (not shown in FIG. 3) for analysis.
  • processor 206 can be located in close physical proximity or connected wirelessly to any one or more of sensors 102 .
  • Sensors 102 also perform forward scattering (or bi-static) measurements, which refers to a TM-UWB radar 202 receiving signal returns corresponding to UWB pulses transmitted by another sensor 102 .
  • radar 202 A receives signal returns corresponding to UWB pulses transmitted by radar 202 B.
  • Radar 202 B passes both back and forward scattering data on to processor 206 .
  • TM-UWB radars 202 must be synchronized in order to utilize the forward scattering data. This synchronization is preferably implemented across communication pathway 104 .
  • Synchronizing radars 202 can be accomplished in at least two different ways.
  • a synchronization signal is transmitted between radars 202 via wireless links 204 .
  • wireless links 204 are chosen which have high temporal resolution, on the order of ten picoseconds. This resolution is necessary to achieve the desired synchronization.
  • each radar 202 receives UWB pulses transmitted by the radar 202 B via two paths.
  • radar 202 A receives forward scattering signal returns that reflect off reflective body 502 .
  • radar 202 A can also receive UWB pulses that travel directly from radar 202 B to radar 202 A. These UWB pulses can be used by radar 202 A for synchronization, so long as the distance between the radars is known.
  • the antenna 208 B associated with radar 202 B must be chosen such that its beam pattern provides for sufficient transmission in the direction of radar 202 A.
  • FIG. 6 depicts intrusion detection system 200 operating in a second mode.
  • certain of the radars 202 are used for forward scattering purposes only, i.e., they transmit UWB pulses which are received by other radars 202 , but do not themselves receive any signal returns.
  • radar 202 B transmits UWB pulses that are received by radar 202 A, as indicated by the forward scattering propagation path.
  • Radar 202 A receives the forward scattering signal returns corresponding to UWB pulses transmitted by radar 202 B, and also receives its own back scattering signal returns.
  • radar 202 B can be implemented in a more simple, inexpensive manner because it need only transmit, not receive.
  • the radars must be synchronized, preferably across communication pathway 104 , in order to utilize the forward scattering data. Note that in this mode, only the radar that receives signal returns passes data (both back and forward scattering data) to processor 206 (not shown in FIG. 6) for analysis. Furthermore, communication only needs to proceed in one direction between wireless links 204 , i.e., from radar 202 A to radar 202 B. Therefore, for embodiments only operating in the second mode, wireless link 204 B can be implemented as a receiver only.
  • FIG. 7 depicts intrusion detection system 200 operating in the third mode.
  • all of the radars 202 collect back scattering data only.
  • each radar 202 transmits UWB pulses and receives the corresponding signal returns.
  • the back scattering data collected by each radar 202 is passed on to processor 206 (not shown in FIG. 7) for analysis. Note that in this mode, there is no requirement that the radars 202 be synchronized because forward scattering data is not being collected.
  • processor 206 generates a radar image based on the signal return data collected by sensors 102 .
  • FIG. 8 depicts building environment 100 for purposes of illustrating the analysis of back scattering data (and forward scattering, where available) to generate an image of inside target 118 .
  • FIG. 8 also depicts an imaging area 802 that defines an example area to be imaged. Imaging area 802 could, for example, represent a portion of the building inside 114 , the entire inside 114 , or the inside 114 and outside 116 . The needs of each particular intrusion system will determine which areas require surveillance, i.e., radar imaging.
  • a grid 804 criss-crosses imaging area 802 , defining one or more voxels 806 (a voxel is a minimum resolution portion of a three dimensional space, comparable to a pixel in two dimensional space).
  • processor 206 calculates a value for each voxel 806 indicative of the reflected energy measured in the portion of imaging area 802 defined by that voxel.
  • the resulting grid 804 of voxels 806 forms a radar image of imaging area 802 .
  • Grid 804 is maintained in processor 206 , and can vary in spacing to define voxels 806 having different resolution (grid 804 need not be orthogonal). Decreasing the grid spacing increases the resolution of the generated image. As shown in FIG. 8, inside target 118 occupies a single voxel 806 A. Though this simplifies the discussion, skilled artisans will recognize that in practice a higher resolution will often be desired.
  • FIG. 9 is a flowchart that depicts step 410 in greater detail according to a preferred time domain interferometry technique for calculating a value for each voxel 806 in imaging area 802 .
  • a reflectogram is generated for each radar 202 in intrusion detection system 100 .
  • FIG. 10 depicts four example reflectograms, 1002 , 1004 , 1006 , and 1008 , corresponding to sensors 102 A, 102 B, 102 C, and 102 D, respectively.
  • Skilled artisans will recognize that a reflectogram describes reflected energy as a function of range (i.e., distance from the transmitting antenna). For example, reflectogram 1002 describes the reflected energy measured at sensor 102 A, whereas reflectogram 1004 describes the reflected energy measured at sensor 102 B.
  • the x-axis represents range, while the y-axis represents reflected energy measured as voltage.
  • each radar 202 generates a reflectogram by sweeping through the ranges of interest, measuring reflected energy at discrete ranges. At each discrete range, radar 202 transmits ultra wideband pulses 808 and then looks for reflected energy after a time delay corresponding to the return time-of-flight. Further details regarding the operation of radar 202 are provided in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,743,906, and 5,363,108, incorporated by reference above. Radar 202 receives and, where multiple pulses are transmitted for each discrete range step, accumulates reflected energy.
  • radar 202 transmits and receives an increasing number of pulses per discrete range step as the range is increased.
  • the reflected energy measured at longer ranges is therefore increased by receiving and integrating a greater number of pulses.
  • the ranges of interest are preferably divided into multiple “range windows,” where the same number of pulses is transmitted for each discrete range within a given window. Skilled artisans will recognize that this is only one example of how this compensation might be implemented.
  • the power of transmitted pulses can be varied according to range.
  • radar 202 increases the power of transmitted pulses as the range gets longer.
  • This alternative compensation has a similar effect to varying the number of transmitted pulses, but will likely require more costly modifications to the basic radar 202 to implement.
  • This, and other related concepts are described in commonly owned, co-pending U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. ______ (attorney docket 1659.0530000), filed the same date as the present application, Jun. 14, 1999, entitled “System and Method for Impulse Radio Power Control,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • an image is formed by selectively combining data from the reflectograms generated in step 902 .
  • An image value is calculated for each voxel 806 , where the image value is indicative of the total amount of reflected energy measured over that portion of imaging area 802 .
  • Processor 206 preferably calculates an image value for each voxel 806 by summing voltage values from the reflectogram associated with each sensor 102 , where the voltage values correspond to the return time-of-flight from the radar to the voxel being calculated. For example, referring to FIGS.
  • the image value for voxel 806 A is the sum of a voltage value from reflectograms 1002 , 1004 , 1006 , and 1008 corresponding to the return time-of-flight.
  • the voltage value at time t 1 corresponds to the return time-of-flight from sensor 102 A to voxel 806 A, as shown in FIG. 8.
  • times t 2 , t 3 , and t 4 correspond to the return time-of-flight from sensors 102 B, 102 C, and 102 D to voxel 806 A, as shown in reflectograms 1004 , 1006 , and 1008 .
  • the sum of these four values forms the image value for voxel 806 A.
  • the image value for each voxel 806 in image area 802 is calculated as the sum of a voltage from each reflectogram corresponding to the return time-of-flight.
  • processor 206 determines whether an alarm condition has been triggered indicating an intrusion. What is defined as an alarm condition depends upon the particular environment in which intrusion detection system is used. For example, in a home security environment, an alarm condition is triggered when a moving object approaches and penetrates a perimeter around the outside of the house or some other predetermined exterior boundary. Alternatively, in a building security environment, movement in a restricted area within the building triggers an alarm condition. Those skilled in the art will recognize that alarm conditions will vary, depending upon the exact environment in which intrusion detection system 200 is installed and the types of intrusion that are to be detected.
  • processor 206 uses the radar images generated in step 304 to detect motion and to track moving objects.
  • processor 206 need only detect movement in a given area.
  • movement detected in a restricted area triggers an alarm condition.
  • Other alarm conditions require additional processing to distinguish between different types of movement. For instance, movement in the vicinity of a window should trigger an alarm condition if the object approached the window from outside 116 , but not if the object approached from inside 114 .
  • Processor 206 can distinguish between these two types of movement by tracking moving objects over time.
  • FIG. 11 is a flowchart that depicts step 306 in detail according to a preferred embodiment.
  • processor 206 updates a clutter map.
  • the clutter map represents stationary and other “don't care” objects within imaging area 802 .
  • a clutter map might include stationary objects such as furniture and walls within a building.
  • the clutter map can also include moving objects that should not trigger an alarm condition, such as ceiling fans.
  • the clutter map can be determined in different ways.
  • the first radar image generated by intrusion detection system 200 is defined as the clutter map. This approach is easy to implement, but is not very robust. For instance, if a piece of furniture within imaging area 802 is moved after the clutter map is generated, it will thereafter appear as a moving object because it was not part of the clutter map.
  • processor 206 sets the clutter map equal to the first radar image generated in step 304 , and does not change the clutter map based on subsequent radar images.
  • the clutter map is updated based on subsequent radar images by low-pass filtering the current radar image on a voxel by voxel basis, and adding the filtered image to the stored clutter map.
  • the clutter map is slowly updated over time so that stationary objects not present initially will be incorporated into the clutter map. For example, if sensors 102 transmit UWB pulses with a center frequency of 2 GHz, and if the 3 dB knee of the lowpass filter is 0.1 Hz, then anything moving at a rate faster than 3 ⁇ 4 inches in 10 seconds will not be passed through the lowpass filter to the clutter map.
  • step 1104 processor 206 subtracts the updated clutter map from the current radar image.
  • the resulting image represents objects within imaging area 802 that were not present in past radar images.
  • FIG. 12A depicts an example clutter map 1200 of building environment 100 , including stationary objects such as doors 110 , windows 108 , interior walls 112 and exterior walls 106 (assume that everything shown in FIG. 12A is within imaging area 802 ).
  • FIG. 12B depicts a radar image 1202 generated subsequent to clutter map 1200 . As shown, inside target 118 has entered the building.
  • FIG. 12C depicts a differential map 1204 calculated in step 1104 by subtracting clutter map 1200 from radar image 1202 . Differential map 1204 therefore represents objects that have moved within imaging area 802 . The appearance of inside target 118 will trigger an alarm condition for those intrusion detection systems that are configured to detect movement in that particular area.
  • a track file is updated based on differential map 1104 calculated in step 1104 .
  • the track file contains information on moving objects being tracked within imaging area 802 .
  • a track file is a collection of historical information on identified objects to allow determination of object motion parameters, such as position, speed, velocity, and direction.
  • objects that appear in differential map 1204 are compared against those objects currently being tracked in the track file.
  • Each object in differential map 1204 is either associated with and used to update an existing object in the track file, or is added to the track file as a new object to track.
  • One method of generating a track file is to map an area using reflectogram data from several sensors, and then later, map the area again and subtract the first map data to derive a map of changes relating to motion in the area.
  • the largest peaks are then identified as objects to be tracked and all energy within a radius (e.g., 1 foot) of each peak is considered part of the object.
  • the object centroid is then found by determining the centroid of all of the “change” signal within the radius.
  • This set of centroids is then compared with previous centroids from the track file. The nearest previous object would be considered the same object of the purposes if determining object motion, velocity, direction. These parameters may be determined from the history of the object centroid locations.
  • a track file may alternatively be maintained by determining an area within some range (e.g., 1 foot) of a previous centroid location for an object, and then computing a new centroid based on this area to be associated with the object. In this way, an object may be incrementally tracked across a room and objects may be determined as entering or exiting a door or widow.
  • some range e.g. 1 foot
  • Map threshold levels may be used to limit the number of objects to a reasonable level. Objects may disappear, or be dropped from the track file, if the total energy drops below a disappearance threshold for a period of time. Likewise objects may be generated based on a single peak threshold crossing, but may not achieve full “object” status until it maintains threshold for a period of time.
  • Tracking the movement of objects within imaging area 802 allows for more sophisticated alarm conditions to be defined. For instance, in the home security environment described above, an alarm condition might be triggered where outside target 120 approaches window 108 , whereas inside target 118 approaching window 108 does not. Those skilled in the art will recognize the many ways that tracking could be used to define robust alarm conditions in a variety of environments.
  • intrusion detection system 200 is calibrated in step 302 prior to generating a radar image in step 304 and detecting intrusion in step 306 .
  • the processing described above with respect to steps 304 and 306 depends, in part, on having accurate knowledge of where the sensors are located with respect to one another. Calibrating intrusion detection system 200 refers to determining these relative positions.
  • FIG. 13 depicts a first alternative calibration system for intrusion detection system 200 .
  • a portable transmitter 1302 is moved along a calibration path 1304 around the area to be protected.
  • calibration path 1304 follows the outside walls 106 of the building.
  • Portable transmitter 1302 transmits UWB pulses, such as a TM-UWB radar 202 .
  • All of the sensors 102 lock their receivers to transmitter 1302 and track its movement around calibration path 1304 .
  • datum marks are made periodically. This is preferably accomplished by the operator pressing a button that modulates transmitter 1302 , sending a bit stream to each sensor 102 identifying the index number of the data point being sent.
  • a real-time clock can be used to continually mark the data received by the sensors 102 . In either case, after completion each sensor 102 sends the calibration data to processor 206 to determine the position of the sensors 102 in relation to each other and calibration path 1304 .
  • step 302 the calibration is performed manually, by locating each sensor on a map, blueprint, survey, or by direct measurement.
  • the calibration data is entered into processor 206 by conventional means familiar to those skilled in the art.
  • each sensor 102 locks on to UWB pulses transmitted by another sensor 102 , one after another, until a range is determined between each pair of sensors 102 .
  • the sensors can be adapted to perform range finding as described in commonly owned, co-pending U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. 09/045,929, attorney docket no. 1659.0470000, filed Mar. 23, 1998, entitled “System and Method For Position Determination By Impulse Radio,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Another alternative embodiment for adapting the sensors to perform range finding is described in commonly owned, co-pending U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. 09/083,993, attorney docket no.
  • Each sensor 102 sends the calibration data to processor 206 to determine the position of the sensors 102 in relation to each other.

Abstract

A system and method for highly selective intrusion detection using a sparse array of time modulated ultra wideband (TM-UWB) radars. Two or more TM-UWB radars are arranged in a sparse array around the perimeter of a building. Each TM-UWB radar transmits ultra wideband pulses that illuminate the building and the surrounding area. Signal return data is processed to determine, among other things, whether an alarm condition has been triggered. High resolution radar images are formed that give an accurate picture of the inside of the building and the surrounding area. This image is used to detect motion in a highly selective manner and to track moving objects within the building and the surrounding area. Motion can be distinguished based on criteria appropriate to the environment in which the intrusion detection system operates.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is related to U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. ______ (Attorney Docket No. 1659.0670000), filed the same day as this application, Jun. 14, 1999, entitled “Wide Area Time Domain Radar Array”, which is incorporated herein by reference.[0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention [0002]
  • The present invention relates generally to radar motion detection, and more particularly to using a sparse array of time modulated ultra wideband radars for highly selective intrusion detection. [0003]
  • 2. Related Art [0004]
  • Today, many homes and businesses employ surveillance systems for intrusion detection. Consumers have spent billions of dollars on home security systems over the last few years, and the number of homes with security systems has increased by almost half. These systems vary dramatically in sophistication and cost, but most include perimeter sensors on outside doors and windows, motion detectors in key inside areas, a control unit to interpret and respond to signals from the sensors, and a siren or other alert mechanism. Most are connected to a central monitoring station, which can notify the police in the event something triggers one of the sensors. [0005]
  • Conventional intrusion detection systems, particularly those in the cost range of the average home or small business owner, suffer from very high false alarm rates, often 90% and above. This imposes prohibitive costs on local police departments having to answer these false alarms. Many cities have responded by charging fines for answering these calls. This in turn provides incentive to home and business owners to deactivate the alarm system to avoid the false alarms. One study suggests that in burglarized homes with alarm systems, almost half of the alarms weren't even activated. [0006]
  • Conventional intrusion detection systems suffer a high rate of false alarms for many reasons. One reason is that these systems provide minimal selectivity. As used herein, selectivity refers to an intrusion detection system's ability to distinguish movement on some basis, such as where the movement is occurring, how fast an object is moving, or the path that an object is moving along. Obviously, detection systems that are more selective will likely suffer fewer false alarms because threatening movement can be more precisely defined and distinguished from movement defined as benign. What is defined as threatening and benign will vary by the particular environment in which the system operates. For instance, in a home environment, threatening movement could be defined as movement around the outside perimeter of the house, while movement inside the house is defined as benign. Therefore, an intruder approaching a door or window from the outside would trigger the alarm, whereas a child opening a bedroom door would not. [0007]
  • A need therefore exists for a highly selective intrusion detection system and method. [0008]
  • Summary of the Invention
  • Briefly stated, the present invention is directed to a system and method for highly selective intrusion detection using a sparse array of time modulated ultra wideband (TM-UWB) radars. TM-UWB radars emit very short RF pulses of low duty cycle approaching Gaussian monocycle pulses with a tightly controlled pulse-to-pulse interval. Two or more of these TM-UWB radars are arranged in a sparse array (i.e., they are spaced at intervals of greater than one quarter wavelength), preferably around the perimeter of a building. Each TM-UWB radar transmits ultra wideband pulses that illuminate the building and the surrounding area. One or more of the radars receives signal returns, and the signal return data is processed to determine, among other things, whether an alarm condition has been triggered. [0009]
  • An advantage of the current invention is that ultra wideband (UWB) pulses are used. As used herein, UWB refers to very short RF pulses of low duty cycle ideally approaching a Gaussian Monocycle. Typically these pulses have a relative bandwidth (i.e., signal bandwidth/center frequency) which is greater than 25%. The ultra wideband nature of these pulses improves both angle and range resolution, which results in improved performance (e.g., greater selectivity, more sensitive motion detection). The term “wavelength”, as used herein in conjunction with ultra wideband systems, refers to the wavelength corresponding to the center frequency of the ultra wideband pulse. [0010]
  • Another advantage of the current invention is that high resolution radar images are formed which give an accurate picture of the inside of the building and the surrounding area. The current invention uses this image to, among other things, detect motion in a highly selective manner and to track moving objects within the building and the surrounding area. High resolution radar images are possible because the TM-UWB radars positioned around the perimeter of the building form a sparse array capable of achieving high angular resolution. Angular resolution is a function of the width of the TM-UWB radar array, i.e., the wider the array, the greater the angular resolution. Conventional narrowband radars arranged in a sparse array suffer off-axis ambiguities, and are therefore not practical. However, the UWB pulses transmitted by the TM-UWB radars are sufficiently short in duration (with very few sidelobes) that the radars can be used in a sparse array configuration without off-axis ambiguities. Furthermore, range ambiguities are cured by time-encoding the sequence of transmitted TM-UWB pulses. [0011]
  • Another advantage of the current invention is that highly selective motion detection is possible. Using the high resolution radar images generated by the TM-UWB radar array, motion can be distinguished based on criteria appropriate to the environment in which the intrusion detection system operates. For example, home security systems according to the present invention can distinguish outside movement around doors and windows from movement inside the house. Alternatively, business security systems can distinguish movement in an unsecured portion of the building from movement in a secured portion. This selectivity can result in lower false alarm rates. [0012]
  • Another advantage of the current invention is that high angular resolution may be achieved at a low center frequency. Because the transmitted UWB pulses have a large relative bandwidth, and because the radar array is wide, a lower center frequency can be maintained and still achieve a high angular resolution. Operating at a lower center frequency relaxes the timing requirements of the system, which makes it easier to achieve synchronization between the radars, and results in less complex, less expensive implementations. A low center frequency also results in UWB pulses that are able to better penetrate lossy materials and withstand weather effects. [0013]
  • Further features and advantages of the invention, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the invention, are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers generally indicate identical, functionally similar, and/or structurally similar elements. The drawing in which an element first appears is indicated by the leftmost digit in the corresponding reference number. [0014]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • The present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein: [0015]
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an example building environment within which the present invention can be used; [0016]
  • FIG. 2 depicts an intrusion detection system; [0017]
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart that describes the operation of the intrusion detection system; [0018]
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart that describes the generation of radar images; [0019]
  • FIG. 5 depicts the intrusion detection system operating in a first mode including back scattering at each sensor and forward scattering; [0020]
  • FIG. 6 depicts the intrusion detection system operating in a second mode including back scattering at one sensor and forward scattering; [0021]
  • FIG. 7 depicts the intrusion detection system operating in a third mode including back scattering only; [0022]
  • FIG. 8 depicts an imaging area within an example building environment; [0023]
  • FIG. 9 is a flowchart that describes the generation of a radar image; [0024]
  • FIG. 10 depicts example reflectograms for four sensors; [0025]
  • FIG. 11 is a flowchart that describes processing the radar images to determine whether an alarm condition has been triggered; [0026]
  • FIG. 12A depicts an example clutter map; [0027]
  • FIG. 12B depicts an example radar image with a moving target; [0028]
  • FIG. 12C depicts an example differential map, calculated as the difference between the clutter map of FIG. 12A and the radar image of FIG. 12B; and [0029]
  • FIG. 13 depicts a preferred calibration of the home intrusion system. [0030]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Overview of the Invention [0031]
  • The present invention is directed to a system and method for highly selective intrusion detection using a sparse array of TM-UWB radars. TM-UWB (or impulse) radio and radar technology was first fully described in a series of patents, including U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,641,317 (issued Feb. 3, 1987), 4,743,906 (issued May 10, 1988), 4,813,057 (issued Mar. 14, 1989), 4,979,186 (issued Dec. 18, 1990) and 5,363,108 (issued Nov. 8, 1994) to Larry W. Fullerton. A second generation of TM-UWB patents include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,677,927 (issued Oct. 14, 1997), 5,687,169 (issued Nov. 11, 1997) and 5,832,035 (issued Nov. 3,1998) to Fullerton et. al. These patent documents are incorporated herein by reference. [0032]
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a [0033] building environment 100 within which the present invention is used. The present invention includes two or more sensors 102. In a preferred embodiment, four sensors 102(102A, 102B, 102C, and 102D, as shown in FIG. 1) are located around the perimeter of a building. Using more than four sensors 102 will further reduce the false alarm rate. The sensors 102 communicate with each other via a communication pathway 104. Though only a single communication pathway 104 is shown, each sensor 102 can communicate with one or more of the other sensors 102.
  • The example building depicted in FIG. 1 includes perimeter (outside) [0034] walls 106, inside walls 112, doors 110, and windows 108. The areas in and around the building are conveniently divided into inside 114 and outside 116. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the building shown in FIG. 1 is only a simple example, and that the concepts described herein apply equally well to any arbitrarily shaped building, with any configuration of doors, windows, interior walls, and furnishings.
  • One of the primary objects of the present invention is to detect movement of objects in and around a perimeter, such as outside walls of a building. A perimeter may alternatively be defined as two boundaries to allow for noise and clutter variations. In a two boundary system, the perimeter may be defined as an inside and outside boundary separated by some distance (e.g. 2 ft). An object on the outside would have to cross the inside boundary to trigger an entry alarm; whereas, an object on the inside would have to cross the outside boundary to trigger an exit alarm. [0035]
  • The present invention will be described in an example embodiment where movement of object are detected in and around the building shown in FIG. 1. For convenience, both an [0036] inside target 118 and an outside target 120 are shown. The following discussion will refer to both collectively as targets.
  • FIG. 2 depicts the components of the present invention in greater detail, referred to collectively as an [0037] intrusion detection system 200. Each sensor 102 preferably includes a TM-UWB radar 202, and a wireless link 204. The sensors 102 communicate with a processor 206 that is responsible for processing the data received by the sensors and determining whether an alarm condition has been met. Note that, for purposes of clarity, only two sensors 102 (A and B) are depicted in FIG. 2. As stated above, intrusion detection system 200 includes two or more sensors 102.
  • TM-UWB radar [0038] 202 is preferably implemented as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,743,906, and 5,363,108, incorporated by reference above. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that the concepts described herein apply equally well to other radars that transmit time modulated UWB pulses.
  • TM-UWB radars [0039] 202 transmit UWB pulses and at least one receives signal returns, depending on the particular mode of operation (described below). Each TM-UWB radar 202 can utilize a single antenna element 208 for both transmission and reception, separate antenna elements for transmission and reception, or even an array of antenna elements for transmission and reception, including phased arrays of antennas. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the number and type of antenna elements will vary based on the particular application and desired transmission characteristics.
  • TM-UWB radar [0040] 202 preferably operates with a center frequency between 1 GHz and 3 GHz, and a pulse repetition rate of 1.25 MHZ. Other center frequencies are possible, though hydrometer effects introduce problems around 10 GHz and above. Similarly, the pulse repetition rate will vary based on the particular embodiment. Note that if the time modulation of the UWB pulses includes a random component, pseudo-random noise (rather than true noise) is used so that the noise sequence can be reproduced at the other radars. A good discussion of time modulation using pseudo-random noise codes for impulse systems is found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,927 (hereafter the '927 patent), incorporated by reference above.
  • Sensors [0041] 102 placed along the perimeter of a building will clearly be separated by more than a quarter wavelength at these center frequencies. The sensors therefore form a sparse array. Sparse arrays of TM-UWB radars are discussed in detail in commonly owned, co-pending U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. ______ (attorney docket 1659.0670000), filed the same day of the present application, Jun. 14, 1999, entitled “Wide Area Time Domain Radar Array,” which has been incorporated by reference. Sensors 102 are preferably packaged for convenient installation in a conventional wall electrical socket, securely fastened such that it cannot easily be removed. Those skilled in the art will recognize that three-dimensional images may be obtained by ensuring that all the sensors 102 do not occupy the same horizontal plane, i.e., at least one sensor 102 occupies a horizontal plane different from the other sensors 102.
  • [0042] Processor 206 can be implemented using many different configurations of computer hardware and software, as is well known to those skilled in the art. Each particular application will dictate the processing needs of the system, size requirements, memory requirements, and other implementational details. Processor 206 can be physically located at any convenient location. Processor 206 can be included in the same packaging with a sensor 102, or close enough to a sensor such that data may be transferred between processor 206 and the nearby sensor via a cable. Alternatively, processor 206 can be physically distant from all sensor 102 and communicate with one or more of them wirelessly.
  • [0043] Communication pathway 104 represents a wire or wireless transmission medium. In a preferred embodiment, sensors 102 communicate with each other via a wireless link, wherein communication pathway 104 represents electromagnetic waves propagating through the environment. Alternatively, communication pathway 104 can be implemented as a cable (e.g., coaxial cable, optical fibre) connecting the radars.
  • Wireless links [0044] 204 provide for wireless communication between sensors 102 via communication pathway 104. Wireless links can be implemented as any number of conventional devices known to those skilled in the art, depending upon the bandwidth required by the particular application. However, wireless link 204 is preferably implemented as a TM-UWB radio, as described in many of the above cited patents and applications. In this preferred embodiment, data transfers are accomplished using subcarrier modulation as described in the '927 patent, incorporated by reference above. Alternatively, a single TM-UWB radar can be configured to perform the functions of wireless link 204 and TM-UWB radar 202. In other words, a single TM-UWB radar is used at each sensor 102 to transmit UWB radar pulses and communicate wirelessly with other sensors 102. Combining these functions into a single unit results in less expensive implementations. Further, in modes that include forward scattering, synchronization between the radars is achieved without requiring a separate synchronization signal. Note that wireless links 204 are unnecessary for those embodiments employing a cable as communication pathway 104.
  • Wireless links [0045] 204 are responsible for, inter alia, transmitting scattering data received by their associated radars 202, and exchanging synchronization information when forward scattering data is being taken. The bandwidth requirements for wireless links 204 depend upon the types of data analysis performed by processor 206, the rate at which TM-UWB radar 202 transmits UWB pulses and various other factors. Wireless links 204 can also be either bidirectional or simplex, depending upon the requirements of the application. Those skilled in the art will recognize the cost to benefit tradeoff associated with conventional wireless implementations. Other implementations are discussed below.
  • Operation of the Current Invention [0046]
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart that describes the operation of the current invention. This section provides an overview of the operation. Each step is then described in detail in the following sections. [0047]
  • In [0048] step 302, intrusion detection system 200 is calibrated. Calibration as used herein refers to, among other things, identifying the positions of the various sensors 102 and one or more security zones. A security zone, as described below, is an area in which certain movement could trigger an alarm condition. The calibration of step 302 is performed before intrusion detection system 200 begins monitoring building environment 100. Further details regarding calibration are provided after detailed discussions of the next two steps.
  • In [0049] step 304, a radar image is generated by the operation of intrusion detection system 200. The sensors 102 transmit UWB pulses, preferably in a omnidirectional manner, and then receive the reflected energy, referred to herein as signal returns or signal return data. Processor 206 then creates a radar image based on the signal return data collected by all sensors 102.
  • In [0050] step 306, processor 206 determines whether an alarm condition has been met. This determination is based on the current radar image, and in many cases, on past radar images as well. Intrusion detection system 200 triggers various alarms in the event that an alarm condition is met, such as lights, sirens, and calls to emergency personnel.
  • The following sections described each step in detail. [0051]
  • Generation of Radar Images [0052]
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart that describes [0053] step 304 in greater detail. In step 402, flow proceeds to step 404 only for those embodiments that include forward scattering measurements. In step 404, radars 202 are synchronized, as described in detail below. Skilled artisans will recognize that this synchronization allows for useful analysis of the scattering data.
  • In [0054] step 406, each of the radars 202 transmits UWB pulses, preferably in an omnidirectional fashion, radiating the pulsed energy in all directions.
  • In [0055] step 408, signal returns are received by at least one radar 202, depending upon the mode of operation. Intrusion detection system 200 preferably operates in three different modes of operation. In all three modes, each TM-UWB radar 202 transmits UWB pulses. The different modes vary based on which radars 202 are configured to receive signal returns, and whether the radars are synchronized for forward scattering measurements.
  • FIG. 5 depicts [0056] intrusion detection system 200 operating in a first mode. Again, for purposes of clarity, only two sensors are depicted (102A and 102B) and a reflective body 502. Reflective body 502 represents any object, either inside 114 or outside 116, that reflects a portion of the transmitted pulse energy. As shown, both TM-UWB radars 202 transmit UWB pulses and receive the corresponding signal returns reflecting off reflective body 502. This process is known to those skilled in the art as back scattering, or mono-static operation. The back scattering data from each radar 202 is passed to processor 206 (not shown in FIG. 3) for analysis. As mentioned above, processor 206 can be located in close physical proximity or connected wirelessly to any one or more of sensors 102.
  • Sensors [0057] 102 also perform forward scattering (or bi-static) measurements, which refers to a TM-UWB radar 202 receiving signal returns corresponding to UWB pulses transmitted by another sensor 102. As shown in FIG. 5, radar 202A receives signal returns corresponding to UWB pulses transmitted by radar 202B. Radar 202B passes both back and forward scattering data on to processor 206. TM-UWB radars 202 must be synchronized in order to utilize the forward scattering data. This synchronization is preferably implemented across communication pathway 104.
  • Synchronizing radars [0058] 202 can be accomplished in at least two different ways. In a first embodiment, a synchronization signal is transmitted between radars 202 via wireless links 204. In this embodiment, wireless links 204 are chosen which have high temporal resolution, on the order of ten picoseconds. This resolution is necessary to achieve the desired synchronization.
  • In a second embodiment, each radar [0059] 202 receives UWB pulses transmitted by the radar 202B via two paths. As described above, radar 202A receives forward scattering signal returns that reflect off reflective body 502. However, radar 202A can also receive UWB pulses that travel directly from radar 202B to radar 202A. These UWB pulses can be used by radar 202A for synchronization, so long as the distance between the radars is known. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the antenna 208B associated with radar 202B must be chosen such that its beam pattern provides for sufficient transmission in the direction of radar 202A.
  • FIG. 6 depicts [0060] intrusion detection system 200 operating in a second mode. In this mode, certain of the radars 202 are used for forward scattering purposes only, i.e., they transmit UWB pulses which are received by other radars 202, but do not themselves receive any signal returns. For example, in FIG. 6, radar 202B transmits UWB pulses that are received by radar 202A, as indicated by the forward scattering propagation path. Radar 202A receives the forward scattering signal returns corresponding to UWB pulses transmitted by radar 202B, and also receives its own back scattering signal returns. If intrusion detection system 200 operates only in the second mode, radar 202B can be implemented in a more simple, inexpensive manner because it need only transmit, not receive.
  • Again, the radars must be synchronized, preferably across [0061] communication pathway 104, in order to utilize the forward scattering data. Note that in this mode, only the radar that receives signal returns passes data (both back and forward scattering data) to processor 206 (not shown in FIG. 6) for analysis. Furthermore, communication only needs to proceed in one direction between wireless links 204, i.e., from radar 202A to radar 202B. Therefore, for embodiments only operating in the second mode, wireless link 204B can be implemented as a receiver only.
  • FIG. 7 depicts [0062] intrusion detection system 200 operating in the third mode. In this mode, all of the radars 202 collect back scattering data only. As shown in FIG. 7, each radar 202 transmits UWB pulses and receives the corresponding signal returns. The back scattering data collected by each radar 202 is passed on to processor 206 (not shown in FIG. 7) for analysis. Note that in this mode, there is no requirement that the radars 202 be synchronized because forward scattering data is not being collected.
  • Returning to the flowchart of FIG. 4, in [0063] step 410, processor 206 generates a radar image based on the signal return data collected by sensors 102. FIG. 8 depicts building environment 100 for purposes of illustrating the analysis of back scattering data (and forward scattering, where available) to generate an image of inside target 118. FIG. 8 also depicts an imaging area 802 that defines an example area to be imaged. Imaging area 802 could, for example, represent a portion of the building inside 114, the entire inside 114, or the inside 114 and outside 116. The needs of each particular intrusion system will determine which areas require surveillance, i.e., radar imaging.
  • A [0064] grid 804 criss-crosses imaging area 802, defining one or more voxels 806 (a voxel is a minimum resolution portion of a three dimensional space, comparable to a pixel in two dimensional space). As described below, processor 206 calculates a value for each voxel 806 indicative of the reflected energy measured in the portion of imaging area 802 defined by that voxel. The resulting grid 804 of voxels 806 forms a radar image of imaging area 802. Grid 804 is maintained in processor 206, and can vary in spacing to define voxels 806 having different resolution (grid 804 need not be orthogonal). Decreasing the grid spacing increases the resolution of the generated image. As shown in FIG. 8, inside target 118 occupies a single voxel 806A. Though this simplifies the discussion, skilled artisans will recognize that in practice a higher resolution will often be desired.
  • FIG. 9 is a flowchart that depicts [0065] step 410 in greater detail according to a preferred time domain interferometry technique for calculating a value for each voxel 806 in imaging area 802. In step 902, a reflectogram is generated for each radar 202 in intrusion detection system 100. FIG. 10 depicts four example reflectograms, 1002, 1004, 1006, and 1008, corresponding to sensors 102A, 102B, 102C, and 102D, respectively. Skilled artisans will recognize that a reflectogram describes reflected energy as a function of range (i.e., distance from the transmitting antenna). For example, reflectogram 1002 describes the reflected energy measured at sensor 102A, whereas reflectogram 1004 describes the reflected energy measured at sensor 102B. The x-axis represents range, while the y-axis represents reflected energy measured as voltage.
  • In a preferred embodiment, each radar [0066] 202 generates a reflectogram by sweeping through the ranges of interest, measuring reflected energy at discrete ranges. At each discrete range, radar 202 transmits ultra wideband pulses 808 and then looks for reflected energy after a time delay corresponding to the return time-of-flight. Further details regarding the operation of radar 202 are provided in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,743,906, and 5,363,108, incorporated by reference above. Radar 202 receives and, where multiple pulses are transmitted for each discrete range step, accumulates reflected energy.
  • Those skilled in the art will recognize that more reflected energy will be measured per transmitted pulse for nearby targets, as compared to those targets positioned farther away. Compensating for this effect allows for more efficient use of the radar's dynamic range. In a preferred embodiment, radar [0067] 202 transmits and receives an increasing number of pulses per discrete range step as the range is increased. The reflected energy measured at longer ranges is therefore increased by receiving and integrating a greater number of pulses. The ranges of interest are preferably divided into multiple “range windows,” where the same number of pulses is transmitted for each discrete range within a given window. Skilled artisans will recognize that this is only one example of how this compensation might be implemented.
  • Alternatively, the power of transmitted pulses can be varied according to range. In this embodiment, radar [0068] 202 increases the power of transmitted pulses as the range gets longer. This alternative compensation has a similar effect to varying the number of transmitted pulses, but will likely require more costly modifications to the basic radar 202 to implement. This, and other related concepts are described in commonly owned, co-pending U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. ______ (attorney docket 1659.0530000), filed the same date as the present application, Jun. 14, 1999, entitled “System and Method for Impulse Radio Power Control,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Returning again to FIG. 9, in [0069] step 904 an image is formed by selectively combining data from the reflectograms generated in step 902. An image value is calculated for each voxel 806, where the image value is indicative of the total amount of reflected energy measured over that portion of imaging area 802. Processor 206 preferably calculates an image value for each voxel 806 by summing voltage values from the reflectogram associated with each sensor 102, where the voltage values correspond to the return time-of-flight from the radar to the voxel being calculated. For example, referring to FIGS. 8 and 10, the image value for voxel 806A is the sum of a voltage value from reflectograms 1002, 1004, 1006, and 1008 corresponding to the return time-of-flight. As shown in reflectogram 1002, the voltage value at time t1 corresponds to the return time-of-flight from sensor 102A to voxel 806A, as shown in FIG. 8. Similarly, times t2, t3, and t4 correspond to the return time-of-flight from sensors 102B, 102C, and 102D to voxel 806A, as shown in reflectograms 1004, 1006, and 1008. The sum of these four values forms the image value for voxel 806A.
  • In this manner the image value for each [0070] voxel 806 in image area 802 is calculated as the sum of a voltage from each reflectogram corresponding to the return time-of-flight.
  • Intrusion Detection [0071]
  • Returning to FIG. 3, in [0072] step 306, processor 206 determines whether an alarm condition has been triggered indicating an intrusion. What is defined as an alarm condition depends upon the particular environment in which intrusion detection system is used. For example, in a home security environment, an alarm condition is triggered when a moving object approaches and penetrates a perimeter around the outside of the house or some other predetermined exterior boundary. Alternatively, in a building security environment, movement in a restricted area within the building triggers an alarm condition. Those skilled in the art will recognize that alarm conditions will vary, depending upon the exact environment in which intrusion detection system 200 is installed and the types of intrusion that are to be detected.
  • In a preferred embodiment, [0073] processor 206 uses the radar images generated in step 304 to detect motion and to track moving objects. In many instances, processor 206 need only detect movement in a given area. In the aforementioned building security environment, movement detected in a restricted area triggers an alarm condition. Other alarm conditions require additional processing to distinguish between different types of movement. For instance, movement in the vicinity of a window should trigger an alarm condition if the object approached the window from outside 116, but not if the object approached from inside 114. Processor 206 can distinguish between these two types of movement by tracking moving objects over time.
  • FIG. 11 is a flowchart that depicts [0074] step 306 in detail according to a preferred embodiment. In step 1102, processor 206 updates a clutter map. The clutter map represents stationary and other “don't care” objects within imaging area 802. For instance, a clutter map might include stationary objects such as furniture and walls within a building. The clutter map can also include moving objects that should not trigger an alarm condition, such as ceiling fans.
  • Those skilled in the art will recognize that the clutter map can be determined in different ways. In one embodiment, the first radar image generated by [0075] intrusion detection system 200 is defined as the clutter map. This approach is easy to implement, but is not very robust. For instance, if a piece of furniture within imaging area 802 is moved after the clutter map is generated, it will thereafter appear as a moving object because it was not part of the clutter map. In this embodiment, processor 206 sets the clutter map equal to the first radar image generated in step 304, and does not change the clutter map based on subsequent radar images.
  • In a preferred embodiment, however, the clutter map is updated based on subsequent radar images by low-pass filtering the current radar image on a voxel by voxel basis, and adding the filtered image to the stored clutter map. In this way, the clutter map is slowly updated over time so that stationary objects not present initially will be incorporated into the clutter map. For example, if sensors [0076] 102 transmit UWB pulses with a center frequency of 2 GHz, and if the 3 dB knee of the lowpass filter is 0.1 Hz, then anything moving at a rate faster than ¾ inches in 10 seconds will not be passed through the lowpass filter to the clutter map.
  • In [0077] step 1104, processor 206 subtracts the updated clutter map from the current radar image. The resulting image represents objects within imaging area 802 that were not present in past radar images. FIG. 12A depicts an example clutter map 1200 of building environment 100, including stationary objects such as doors 110, windows 108, interior walls 112 and exterior walls 106 (assume that everything shown in FIG. 12A is within imaging area 802). FIG. 12B depicts a radar image 1202 generated subsequent to clutter map 1200. As shown, inside target 118 has entered the building. FIG. 12C depicts a differential map 1204 calculated in step 1104 by subtracting clutter map 1200 from radar image 1202. Differential map 1204 therefore represents objects that have moved within imaging area 802. The appearance of inside target 118 will trigger an alarm condition for those intrusion detection systems that are configured to detect movement in that particular area.
  • In [0078] step 1106, a track file is updated based on differential map 1104 calculated in step 1104. The track file contains information on moving objects being tracked within imaging area 802. For example, a track file is a collection of historical information on identified objects to allow determination of object motion parameters, such as position, speed, velocity, and direction. In a preferred embodiment, objects that appear in differential map 1204 are compared against those objects currently being tracked in the track file. Each object in differential map 1204 is either associated with and used to update an existing object in the track file, or is added to the track file as a new object to track.
  • One method of generating a track file is to map an area using reflectogram data from several sensors, and then later, map the area again and subtract the first map data to derive a map of changes relating to motion in the area. The largest peaks are then identified as objects to be tracked and all energy within a radius (e.g., 1 foot) of each peak is considered part of the object. The object centroid is then found by determining the centroid of all of the “change” signal within the radius. This set of centroids is then compared with previous centroids from the track file. The nearest previous object would be considered the same object of the purposes if determining object motion, velocity, direction. These parameters may be determined from the history of the object centroid locations. [0079]
  • A track file may alternatively be maintained by determining an area within some range (e.g., 1 foot) of a previous centroid location for an object, and then computing a new centroid based on this area to be associated with the object. In this way, an object may be incrementally tracked across a room and objects may be determined as entering or exiting a door or widow. [0080]
  • Map threshold levels may be used to limit the number of objects to a reasonable level. Objects may disappear, or be dropped from the track file, if the total energy drops below a disappearance threshold for a period of time. Likewise objects may be generated based on a single peak threshold crossing, but may not achieve full “object” status until it maintains threshold for a period of time. [0081]
  • Tracking the movement of objects within [0082] imaging area 802 allows for more sophisticated alarm conditions to be defined. For instance, in the home security environment described above, an alarm condition might be triggered where outside target 120 approaches window 108, whereas inside target 118 approaching window 108 does not. Those skilled in the art will recognize the many ways that tracking could be used to define robust alarm conditions in a variety of environments.
  • Calibration [0083]
  • Returning to FIG. 3, [0084] intrusion detection system 200 is calibrated in step 302 prior to generating a radar image in step 304 and detecting intrusion in step 306. The processing described above with respect to steps 304 and 306 depends, in part, on having accurate knowledge of where the sensors are located with respect to one another. Calibrating intrusion detection system 200 refers to determining these relative positions.
  • FIG. 13 depicts a first alternative calibration system for [0085] intrusion detection system 200. A portable transmitter 1302 is moved along a calibration path 1304 around the area to be protected. For the example shown in FIG. 13, calibration path 1304 follows the outside walls 106 of the building. Those skilled in the art will recognize that calibration path 1304 will vary for different environments and alarm conditions. Portable transmitter 1302 transmits UWB pulses, such as a TM-UWB radar 202.
  • All of the sensors [0086] 102 lock their receivers to transmitter 1302 and track its movement around calibration path 1304. As the sensors 102 track transmitter 1302, datum marks are made periodically. This is preferably accomplished by the operator pressing a button that modulates transmitter 1302, sending a bit stream to each sensor 102 identifying the index number of the data point being sent. Alternatively, a real-time clock can be used to continually mark the data received by the sensors 102. In either case, after completion each sensor 102 sends the calibration data to processor 206 to determine the position of the sensors 102 in relation to each other and calibration path 1304.
  • In a second alternative embodiment, in [0087] step 302, the calibration is performed manually, by locating each sensor on a map, blueprint, survey, or by direct measurement. The calibration data is entered into processor 206 by conventional means familiar to those skilled in the art.
  • In a third alternative embodiment, in [0088] step 302, each sensor 102 locks on to UWB pulses transmitted by another sensor 102, one after another, until a range is determined between each pair of sensors 102. The sensors can be adapted to perform range finding as described in commonly owned, co-pending U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. 09/045,929, attorney docket no. 1659.0470000, filed Mar. 23, 1998, entitled “System and Method For Position Determination By Impulse Radio,” which is incorporated herein by reference. Another alternative embodiment for adapting the sensors to perform range finding is described in commonly owned, co-pending U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. 09/083,993, attorney docket no. 1659.0660000, filed May 26, 1998, entitled “System and Method For Distance Measurement by Inphase and Quadrature Signals In A Radio System,” which is also incorporated herein by reference. Each sensor 102 sends the calibration data to processor 206 to determine the position of the sensors 102 in relation to each other.
  • Conclusion [0089]
  • While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents. [0090]
  • The previous description of the preferred embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. [0091]

Claims (37)

1. An intrusion detection system comprising:
a first time modulated ultra wideband (TM-UWB) radar, wherein said first TM-UWB radar is adapted to transmit UWB pulses and receive signal returns, and wherein said UWB pulses have a wavelength corresponding to the center frequency of said UWB pulses;
a second TM-UWB radar, spaced a distance from said first TM-UWB radar, said distance being greater than ¾ of said wavelength, wherein said second TM-UWB radar is adapted to transmit further UWB pulses, and wherein said further UWB pulses have said wavelength; and
a processor in communications with at least said first TM-UWB radar, wherein said processor detects intrusion based on said signal returns.
2. The system of
claim 1
, wherein said first TM-UWB radar receives signal returns that correspond to said UWB pulses transmitted by said first TM-UWB radar, and
wherein said processor detects intrusion based on at least said signal returns that correspond to said UWB pulses transmitted by said first TM-UWB radar.
3. The system of
claim 1
, wherein said first TM-UWB radar receives signal returns that correspond to said further UWB pulses transmitted by said second TM-UWB radar, and
wherein said processor detects intrusion based on at least said signal returns that correspond to said further UWB pulses transmitted by said second TM-UWB radar.
4. The system of
claim 1
, wherein said first TM-UWB radar receives signal returns that correspond to said UWB pulses transmitted by said first TM-UWB radar and signal returns that correspond to said further UWB pulses transmitted by said second TM-UWB radar, and
wherein said processor detects intrusion based on said signal returns that correspond to said UWB pulses transmitted by said first TM-UWB radar and said signal returns that correspond to said further UWB pulses transmitted by said second TM-UWB radar.
5. The system of
claim 1
, wherein said processor detects intrusion by determining whether an alarm condition is met based on said signal returns.
6. The system of
claim 1
, wherein said processor detects intrusion by detecting movement of an object in a given area based on said signal returns.
7. The system of
claim 6
, wherein the object comprises one or more human beings positioned outside of a building and wherein said first and second TM-UWB radars are positioned inside the building.
8. The system of
claim 6
, wherein the given area includes a predetermined boundary, and wherein said processor triggers an alarm when said processor detects penetration of the boundary by the object.
9. The system of
claim 8
, wherein the boundary comprises a first side and a second side, and wherein said processor only triggers the alarm when said processor detects movement toward the first side of the boundary.
10. The system of
claim 8
, wherein the boundary is defined by a location of a window.
11. The system of
claim 6
, wherein the given area comprises a predetermined boundary, and wherein said processor triggers an alarm when said processor detects movement toward, and penetration of, the boundary by the object.
12. The system of
claim 11
, wherein the boundary includes a first side and a second side, and wherein said processor only triggers the alarm when said processor detects movement toward, and penetration of, the first side of the boundary.
13. The system of
claim 11
, wherein the boundary is defined by a location of a window.
14. The system of
claim 11
, wherein the first side of the boundary is outside a building, and wherein the second side of the boundary is inside the building.
15. The system of
claim 1
, wherein said processor generates an image based on said signal returns and detects intrusion based on said image.
16. The system of
claim 15
, wherein said processor generates a reflectogram based on said signal returns and generates said image based on said reflectograms.
17. The system of
claim 1
, wherein said processor generates an image based on said returns signals, subtracts said image from a clutter map to thereby create a differential map, and detects intrusion based on said differential map.
18. The system of
claim 17
, wherein said processor triggers an alarm when it detects intrusion, and wherein said clutter map represents objects that should not cause said processor to trigger the alarm.
19. The system of
claim 17
, wherein said processor updates a track file based on said differential map, tracks movement in a given area based on said track file, and detects intrusion based on the movement.
20. The system of
claim 1
, wherein said first and second TM-UWB radars are positioned along the perimeter of a building.
21. The system of
claim 1
, further comprising:
a first wireless link coupled to said processor; and
a second wireless link coupled to said second TM-UWB radar,
wherein said second wireless link communicates with said first wireless link,
wherein said second TM-UWB radar receives signal returns that correspond to UWB pulses transmitted by said second TM-UWB radar, and
wherein said processor detects intrusion based on said signal returns received by said first and second TM-UWB radars.
22. The system of
claim 1
, wherein said first TM-UWB radar receives signal returns that correspond to UWB pulses transmitted by said second TM-UWB radar, and wherein said first and second TM-UWB radars are synchronized.
23. The system of
claim 1
, wherein said second TM-UWB radar receives signal returns that correspond to UWB pulses transmitted by said second TM-UWB radar, wherein said first TM-UWB radar receives signal returns that correspond to UWB pulses transmitted by said second TM-UWB radar, wherein said first and second TM-UWB radars are synchronized, and wherein said processor detects intrusion based on said signal returns received by said first and second TM-UWB radars.
24. An intrusion detection system comprising:
a first time modulated ultra wideband (TM-UWB) radar, wherein said first TM-UWB radar is adapted to transmit UWB pulses in a given area and to receive signal returns, wherein said UWB pulses have a wavelength corresponding to the center frequency of said UWB pulses;
a second TM-UWB radar, spaced a distance from said first TM-UWB radar, said distance being greater than ¼ of said wavelength, wherein said second TM-UWB radar is adapted to transmit further UWB pulses in said given area, wherein said further UWB pulses have said wavelength; and
a processor in communications with at least said first TM-UWB radar, wherein said processor detects motion within said given area based on said signal returns.
25. The system of
claim 24
, wherein said first TM-UWB radar receives signal returns that correspond to said UWB pulses transmitted by said first TM-UWB radar, and
wherein said processor detects intrusion based on at least said signal returns that correspond to said UWB pulses transmitted by said first TM-UWB radar.
26. The system of
claim 24
, wherein said first TM-UWB radar receives signal returns that correspond to said further UWB pulses transmitted by said second TM-UWB radar, and
wherein said processor detects intrusion based on at least said signal returns that correspond to said further UWB pulses transmitted by said second TM-UWB radar.
27. The system of
claim 24
, wherein said first TM-UWB radar receives signal returns that correspond to said UWB pulses transmitted by said first TM-UWB radar and signal returns that correspond to said further UWB pulses transmitted by said second TM-UWB radar, and
wherein said processor detects intrusion based on said signal returns that correspond to said UWB pulses transmitted by said first TM-UWB radar and said signal returns that correspond to said further UWB pulses transmitted by said second TM-UWB radar.
28. A method for detecting intrusion, comprising the steps of:
a. transmitting ultra wideband (UWB) pulses from a first location, wherein said UWB pulses have a wavelength corresponding to the center frequency of said UWB pulses;
b. transmitting further UWB pulses having said wavelength from a second location, wherein said second location is spaced a distance from said first location, said distance being greater than ¼ of said wavelength;
c. receiving signal returns at at least said first location; and
d. detecting intrusion based on said signal returns.
29. The method of
claim 28
, wherein said step d. comprises the steps of:
i. generating an image based on said signal returns; and
ii. detecting intrusion based on said image.
30. The method of
claim 28
, wherein said step d. comprises the steps of:
i. generating reflectogram data based on said signal returns;
ii. generating an image based on said reflectogram data; and
iii. detecting intrusion based on said image.
31. The method of
claim 30
, wherein said step d.iii. comprises the steps of:
(1) subtracting said image from a clutter map to thereby create a differential map; and
(2) detecting intrusion based on said differential map.
32. The method of
claim 31
, wherein said step d.iii.(2) comprises the steps of:
(a) updating a track file based on said differential map;
(b) tracking movement of an object based on said track file; and
(c) triggering an alarm based on said movement.
33. The method of
claim 28
, further comprising the step of determining relative positions of said first location and said second location with respect to one another prior to said step d..
34. The method of
claim 33
, wherein said step of determining relative positions comprises the steps of:
i. receiving additional UWB pulses, at said first and second locations;
ii. generating calibration data based on said additional UWB pulses; and
iii. determining said relative positions based on said calibration data.
35. The method of
claim 34
, wherein said additional UWB pulses are generated by a transmitter moving along a calibration path.
36. The method of
claim 28
, wherein said step d. comprises the step of:
i. determining whether an alarm condition has been met based on said signal returns.
37. The method of
claim 28
, wherein step c. comprises the step of receiving signal returns at said first location and said second location, and wherein step d. comprises the step of detecting intrusion based on said signal returns received at said first location and said second location.
US09/767,131 1999-06-14 2001-01-23 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array Expired - Lifetime US6400307B2 (en)

Priority Applications (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/767,131 US6400307B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2001-01-23 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US10/131,598 US6573857B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2002-04-25 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US10/449,602 US6710736B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2003-06-02 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US10/806,131 US7358888B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2004-03-23 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US11/140,535 US7649925B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2005-05-28 Time transfer utilizing ultra wideband signals
US11/980,739 US7592944B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2007-10-31 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US11/980,529 US7873099B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2007-10-31 Time transfer using ultra wideband signals
US11/980,408 US7417581B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2007-10-31 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/332,502 US6177903B1 (en) 1999-06-14 1999-06-14 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US09/767,131 US6400307B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2001-01-23 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/332,502 Continuation US6177903B1 (en) 1999-06-14 1999-06-14 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/131,598 Continuation US6573857B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2002-04-25 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US10/806,131 Continuation US7358888B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2004-03-23 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20010035837A1 true US20010035837A1 (en) 2001-11-01
US6400307B2 US6400307B2 (en) 2002-06-04

Family

ID=23298507

Family Applications (6)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/332,502 Expired - Lifetime US6177903B1 (en) 1999-06-14 1999-06-14 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US09/767,131 Expired - Lifetime US6400307B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2001-01-23 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US10/131,598 Expired - Lifetime US6573857B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2002-04-25 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US10/449,602 Expired - Lifetime US6710736B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2003-06-02 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US10/806,131 Expired - Lifetime US7358888B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2004-03-23 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US11/980,408 Expired - Fee Related US7417581B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2007-10-31 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/332,502 Expired - Lifetime US6177903B1 (en) 1999-06-14 1999-06-14 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array

Family Applications After (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/131,598 Expired - Lifetime US6573857B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2002-04-25 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US10/449,602 Expired - Lifetime US6710736B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2003-06-02 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US10/806,131 Expired - Lifetime US7358888B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2004-03-23 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US11/980,408 Expired - Fee Related US7417581B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2007-10-31 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (6) US6177903B1 (en)
AU (1) AU7981700A (en)
WO (1) WO2001001168A2 (en)

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6400307B2 (en) * 1999-06-14 2002-06-04 Time Domain Corporation System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US6535159B1 (en) * 2000-12-01 2003-03-18 Omron Corporation Immersion object detection system and method
US20030174048A1 (en) * 1998-12-11 2003-09-18 Mccorkle John W. Method and system for performing distance measuring and direction finding using ultrawide bandwidth transmissions
EP1365259A1 (en) * 2002-03-01 2003-11-26 Hitachi, Ltd. detecting system
EP1394564A2 (en) 2002-08-27 2004-03-03 Omron Corporation Intruding object detecting apparatus with variable detection region and calibration process
US20050167588A1 (en) * 2003-12-30 2005-08-04 The Mitre Corporation Techniques for building-scale electrostatic tomography
US20070133351A1 (en) * 2005-12-12 2007-06-14 Taylor Gordon E Human target acquisition system and method
WO2008001092A2 (en) * 2006-06-28 2008-01-03 Cambridge Consultants Limited Radar for through wall detection
US20080151967A1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2008-06-26 Time Domain Corporation Time transfer using ultra wideband signals
US20080165046A1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2008-07-10 Time Domain Corporation System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US20090135045A1 (en) * 2007-11-28 2009-05-28 Camero-Tech Ltd. Through-the-obstacle radar system and method of operation
US7567200B1 (en) 2006-04-27 2009-07-28 Josef Osterweil Method and apparatus for body position monitor and fall detect ion using radar
US20100134285A1 (en) * 2008-12-02 2010-06-03 Honeywell International Inc. Method of sensor data fusion for physical security systems
US7916066B1 (en) * 2006-04-27 2011-03-29 Josef Osterweil Method and apparatus for a body position monitor and fall detector using radar
US20140247695A1 (en) * 2011-06-15 2014-09-04 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Method for robust and fast presence detection with a sensor
US20150158428A1 (en) * 2010-07-27 2015-06-11 Ryan P. Beggs Methods and apparatus to detect and warn proximate entities of interest
US20150198713A1 (en) * 2014-01-13 2015-07-16 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Method and System for Through-the-Wall Imaging using Compressive Sensing and MIMO Antenna Arrays
US9643572B1 (en) * 2015-10-29 2017-05-09 Hyundai Motor Company Method and apparatus for detecting intrusion into large vehicle
US9672710B2 (en) * 2015-02-26 2017-06-06 International Business Machines Corporation Item movement tracking with three-dimensional (3D) proximity exclusions
CN109298417A (en) * 2018-09-30 2019-02-01 湖南华诺星空电子技术有限公司 A kind of constructure inner structure detection method and device based on Radar Signal Processing
EP3599482A1 (en) * 2018-07-24 2020-01-29 Nxp B.V. Methods and apparatuses involving vehicle tow-away detection
US20210223386A1 (en) * 2020-01-17 2021-07-22 Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd. Method and device for acquiring ar or vr information, mobile terminal, and storage medium
US11703593B2 (en) 2019-04-04 2023-07-18 TransRobotics, Inc. Technologies for acting based on object tracking
US11719800B2 (en) 2011-02-21 2023-08-08 TransRobotics, Inc. System and method for sensing distance and/or movement
US11717189B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2023-08-08 TransRobotics, Inc. Systems and methods for high resolution distance sensing and applications

Families Citing this family (204)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6466125B1 (en) * 1998-03-23 2002-10-15 Time Domain Corporation System and method using impulse radio technology to track and monitor people needing health care
US6501393B1 (en) * 1999-09-27 2002-12-31 Time Domain Corporation System and method for using impulse radio technology to track and monitor vehicles
WO2000013037A1 (en) * 1998-08-31 2000-03-09 Osaka Gas Co., Ltd. Three-dimensional questing method, three-dimensional voxel data displaying method, and device therefor
US6826369B1 (en) * 1999-04-23 2004-11-30 System To Asic, Inc. Intelligent sensor platform
US20040090983A1 (en) * 1999-09-10 2004-05-13 Gehring Stephan W. Apparatus and method for managing variable-sized data slots within a time division multiple access frame
US7023833B1 (en) * 1999-09-10 2006-04-04 Pulse-Link, Inc. Baseband wireless network for isochronous communication
US7088795B1 (en) 1999-11-03 2006-08-08 Pulse-Link, Inc. Ultra wide band base band receiver
US6952456B1 (en) 2000-06-21 2005-10-04 Pulse-Link, Inc. Ultra wide band transmitter
US6970448B1 (en) * 2000-06-21 2005-11-29 Pulse-Link, Inc. Wireless TDMA system and method for network communications
WO2002023218A2 (en) * 2000-09-14 2002-03-21 Time Domain Corporation System and method for detecting an intruder using impulse radio technology
US6519464B1 (en) * 2000-12-14 2003-02-11 Pulse-Link, Inc. Use of third party ultra wideband devices to establish geo-positional data
US6437756B1 (en) * 2001-01-02 2002-08-20 Time Domain Corporation Single element antenna apparatus
US6670909B2 (en) * 2001-01-16 2003-12-30 Time Domain Corporation Ultra-wideband smart sensor interface network and method
US6552677B2 (en) 2001-02-26 2003-04-22 Time Domain Corporation Method of envelope detection and image generation
US6667724B2 (en) 2001-02-26 2003-12-23 Time Domain Corporation Impulse radar antenna array and method
US8270452B2 (en) * 2002-04-30 2012-09-18 Lightwaves Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for multi-band UWB communications
WO2002078204A1 (en) * 2001-03-26 2002-10-03 Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne (Epfl) Sampling method for a spread spectrum communication system
US6763282B2 (en) * 2001-06-04 2004-07-13 Time Domain Corp. Method and system for controlling a robot
AU2002333320A1 (en) 2001-08-02 2003-02-17 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Material handling systems with high frequency radio location devices
WO2003021778A2 (en) * 2001-09-04 2003-03-13 Xtremespectrum, Inc. Monocycle generator
WO2003044968A2 (en) * 2001-11-09 2003-05-30 Pulse-Link, Inc. Ultra-wideband antenna array
JP2003315450A (en) * 2002-04-24 2003-11-06 Hitachi Ltd Monitoring system for millimeter wave radar
US7428258B2 (en) * 2002-10-17 2008-09-23 Time Domain Corporation Method and apparatus for generating RF waveforms having aggregate energy with desired spectral characteristics
US7436876B2 (en) * 2002-11-15 2008-10-14 Time Domain Corporation System and method for fast acquisition of ultra wideband signals
US6982640B2 (en) 2002-11-21 2006-01-03 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. RFID system and method for tracking food freshness
US20040103034A1 (en) * 2002-11-21 2004-05-27 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. RFID system and method for purchase item accountability
US7221900B2 (en) * 2002-11-21 2007-05-22 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Jamming device against RFID smart tag systems
US7061379B2 (en) 2002-11-21 2006-06-13 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. RFID system and method for ensuring safety of hazardous or dangerous substances
US6853303B2 (en) * 2002-11-21 2005-02-08 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. RFID system and method for ensuring personnel safety
US7617132B2 (en) 2002-11-21 2009-11-10 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. RFID system and method for ensuring food safety
US7490054B2 (en) * 2002-11-21 2009-02-10 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. RFID system and method for vending machine control
US7607169B1 (en) 2002-12-02 2009-10-20 Arcsight, Inc. User interface for network security console
US7880684B2 (en) * 2002-12-16 2011-02-01 Next-Rf, Inc. Small aperture broadband localizing system
CA2526133C (en) * 2003-05-22 2012-04-10 General Atomics Ultra-wideband radar system using sub-band coded pulses
US20050100077A1 (en) * 2003-08-04 2005-05-12 Lowell Rosen Multipath-adapted holographic communications apparatus and methods
JP3977303B2 (en) * 2003-08-21 2007-09-19 シャープ株式会社 Position detection system, transmitter and receiver in position detection system
US20050149414A1 (en) * 2003-12-30 2005-07-07 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. RFID system and method for managing out-of-stock items
US7853477B2 (en) * 2003-12-30 2010-12-14 O'shea Michael D RF-based electronic system and method for automatic cross-marketing promotional offers and check-outs
US7463142B2 (en) 2003-12-30 2008-12-09 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. RFID system and method for tracking environmental data
US7814582B2 (en) 2003-12-31 2010-10-19 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. System and method for measuring and monitoring overflow or wetness conditions in a washroom
US7469595B2 (en) * 2004-03-03 2008-12-30 Metis Design Corporation Piezoelectric damage detection device
JP4154675B2 (en) * 2004-03-30 2008-09-24 アイシン精機株式会社 Condition detection sensor
US7239277B2 (en) 2004-04-12 2007-07-03 Time Domain Corporation Method and system for extensible position location
US7053820B2 (en) * 2004-05-05 2006-05-30 Raytheon Company Generating three-dimensional images using impulsive radio frequency signals
US7132975B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2006-11-07 Time Domain Corporation Apparatus and method for detecting moving objects
US7333047B2 (en) * 2004-05-28 2008-02-19 Time Domain Corporation System and method for spatially diverse radar signal processing
FR2872329B1 (en) * 2004-06-25 2006-08-04 Jean Duffau INTRUSION ALARM IN A SPACE- ANY CONTOUR PLAN SUITABLE FOR PRIVATE POOLS
US7154392B2 (en) * 2004-07-09 2006-12-26 Rastegar Jahangir S Wide-area intruder detection and tracking network
US20060028374A1 (en) * 2004-08-06 2006-02-09 Time Domain Corporation System and method for ultra wideband subarray beam steering
US7046187B2 (en) * 2004-08-06 2006-05-16 Time Domain Corporation System and method for active protection of a resource
WO2006020864A1 (en) * 2004-08-12 2006-02-23 James Henly Cornwell Jamming system
US20060061504A1 (en) * 2004-09-23 2006-03-23 The Regents Of The University Of California Through wall detection and tracking system
EP1802938B1 (en) * 2004-10-07 2015-09-09 Metis Design Corporation Sensor infrastructure with embedded electronics
US7417582B2 (en) * 2004-10-22 2008-08-26 Time Domain Corporation System and method for triggering an explosive device
US20060088081A1 (en) * 2004-10-22 2006-04-27 Time Domain Corporation Transmit-rake apparatus in communication systems and associated methods
US8253619B2 (en) * 2005-02-15 2012-08-28 Techtronic Power Tools Technology Limited Electromagnetic scanning imager
US20060233045A1 (en) * 2005-04-14 2006-10-19 Fluhler Herbert U Apparatus for effecting acoustic surveillance of a space beyond a barrier
US20060233046A1 (en) * 2005-04-14 2006-10-19 Fluhler Herbert U Apparatus for effecting surveillance of a space beyond a barrier
US20070129879A1 (en) * 2005-12-07 2007-06-07 Honeywell International Inc. Precision approach guidance using global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and ultra-wideband (UWB) technology
JP2007174244A (en) * 2005-12-21 2007-07-05 Canon Inc Radio communication equipment and range-finding method
US20070162964A1 (en) * 2006-01-12 2007-07-12 Wang Liang-Yun Embedded system insuring security and integrity, and method of increasing security thereof
WO2007106806A2 (en) * 2006-03-13 2007-09-20 Nielsen Media Research, Inc. Methods and apparatus for using radar to monitor audiences in media environments
JP4912005B2 (en) * 2006-03-23 2012-04-04 オムロンオートモーティブエレクトロニクス株式会社 Detection apparatus and method
US7492306B2 (en) * 2006-03-24 2009-02-17 Tdk Corporation Boundary crossing object detection system
IL174737A (en) 2006-04-03 2014-12-31 Camero Tech Ltd System and method for volume visualization in ultra-wideband radar
US9215581B2 (en) * 2006-04-14 2015-12-15 Qualcomm Incorported Distance-based presence management
US20070242026A1 (en) * 2006-04-14 2007-10-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Apparatus and method of pulse generation for ultra-wideband transmission
US8886125B2 (en) 2006-04-14 2014-11-11 Qualcomm Incorporated Distance-based association
US20070249288A1 (en) * 2006-04-14 2007-10-25 Kamran Moallemi Distance-based security
US8644396B2 (en) * 2006-04-18 2014-02-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Waveform encoding for wireless applications
US7533578B2 (en) * 2006-04-18 2009-05-19 Metis Design Corporation Triangulation with co-located sensors
US8552903B2 (en) * 2006-04-18 2013-10-08 Qualcomm Incorporated Verified distance ranging
US8811456B2 (en) * 2006-04-19 2014-08-19 Qualcomm Incorporated Apparatus and method of low latency multi-hop communication
US7576605B2 (en) * 2006-04-20 2009-08-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Low power output stage
US9124357B2 (en) * 2006-04-20 2015-09-01 Qualcomm Incorporated Media access control for ultra-wide band communication
US8289159B2 (en) * 2006-04-26 2012-10-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Wireless localization apparatus and method
EP2020091A2 (en) * 2006-04-26 2009-02-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Inter-pulse duty cycling
US8406794B2 (en) * 2006-04-26 2013-03-26 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatuses of initiating communication in wireless networks
AR060670A1 (en) 2006-04-26 2008-07-02 Qualcomm Inc DYNAMIC DISTRIBUTION OF FUNCTIONALITY AND ADMINISTRATION OF RESOURCES IN A DEVICE
US20100066587A1 (en) * 2006-07-14 2010-03-18 Brian Masao Yamauchi Method and System for Controlling a Remote Vehicle
US7411497B2 (en) * 2006-08-15 2008-08-12 Lawrence Kates System and method for intruder detection
US7855611B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2010-12-21 Qualcomm Incorporated Delay line calibration
US20080112512A1 (en) * 2006-11-15 2008-05-15 Qualcomm Incorporated Transmitted reference signaling scheme
US7716001B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2010-05-11 Qualcomm Incorporated Delay line calibration
US7889753B2 (en) * 2006-11-16 2011-02-15 Qualcomm Incorporated Multiple access techniques for a wireless communication medium
US8014425B2 (en) * 2006-11-16 2011-09-06 Qualcomm Incorporated Multiple access techniques for a wireless communiation medium
US20080116941A1 (en) * 2006-11-16 2008-05-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Peak signal detector
US8363583B2 (en) * 2006-12-15 2013-01-29 Qualcomm Incorporated Channel access scheme for ultra-wide band communication
US20100283608A1 (en) * 2007-01-04 2010-11-11 Honeywell International Inc. Intrusion Warning and Reporting Network
US8066768B2 (en) * 2007-01-29 2011-11-29 Werblin Research & Development Corp. Intraocular lens system
US20090017910A1 (en) * 2007-06-22 2009-01-15 Broadcom Corporation Position and motion tracking of an object
US8837724B2 (en) * 2007-03-27 2014-09-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Synchronization test for device authentication
US8890677B2 (en) * 2007-03-29 2014-11-18 Zebra Enterprise Solutions Corp. Active virtual fence using mesh networked RF tags
US7592878B2 (en) 2007-04-05 2009-09-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for generating oscillating signals
US20080262928A1 (en) * 2007-04-18 2008-10-23 Oliver Michaelis Method and apparatus for distribution and personalization of e-coupons
US7834482B2 (en) * 2007-04-23 2010-11-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Apparatus and method for generating fine timing from coarse timing source
US8111797B2 (en) * 2007-05-08 2012-02-07 Tdc Acquisition Holdings, Inc. Enhanced system and method for detecting the leading edge of a waveform
US9524502B2 (en) * 2007-06-20 2016-12-20 Qualcomm Incorporated Management of dynamic electronic coupons
US9483769B2 (en) 2007-06-20 2016-11-01 Qualcomm Incorporated Dynamic electronic coupon for a mobile environment
US20090076911A1 (en) * 2007-06-20 2009-03-19 Dang Minh Vo Mobile coupons utilizing peer to peer ranging
US9141961B2 (en) 2007-06-20 2015-09-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Management of dynamic mobile coupons
US8326246B2 (en) * 2007-07-10 2012-12-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Super regenerative (SR) apparatus having plurality of parallel SR amplifiers tuned to distinct frequencies
US8103228B2 (en) * 2007-07-12 2012-01-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Method for determining line-of-sight (LOS) distance between remote communications devices
US7576672B2 (en) * 2007-07-18 2009-08-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Adaptive Dynamic Range Control
US8059573B2 (en) * 2007-07-30 2011-11-15 Qualcomm Incorporated Method of pairing devices
IL184972A0 (en) * 2007-08-01 2008-11-03 Camero Tech Ltd System and method for volume visualization in through-the-obstacle imaging system
US7974580B2 (en) 2007-08-28 2011-07-05 Qualcomm Incorporated Apparatus and method for modulating an amplitude, phase or both of a periodic signal on a per cycle basis
US8005065B2 (en) * 2007-09-11 2011-08-23 Qualcomm Incorporated Keep-alive for wireless networks
US8385474B2 (en) * 2007-09-21 2013-02-26 Qualcomm Incorporated Signal generator with adjustable frequency
US8446976B2 (en) * 2007-09-21 2013-05-21 Qualcomm Incorporated Signal generator with adjustable phase
US7965805B2 (en) 2007-09-21 2011-06-21 Qualcomm Incorporated Signal generator with signal tracking
US8233572B2 (en) * 2007-09-25 2012-07-31 Qualcomm Incorporated Interference mitigation for impulse-based communication
US8275373B2 (en) * 2007-09-28 2012-09-25 Qualcomm Incorporated Randomization of periodic channel scans
US8538345B2 (en) 2007-10-09 2013-09-17 Qualcomm Incorporated Apparatus including housing incorporating a radiating element of an antenna
EP2051100A1 (en) * 2007-10-19 2009-04-22 Ford Global Technologies, LLC A method and system for presence detection
JP5275358B2 (en) * 2007-10-26 2013-08-28 クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッド Preamble capture and media access control
US7796033B2 (en) * 2007-11-14 2010-09-14 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for calibrating a microwave motion detector
FR2925169B1 (en) * 2007-12-18 2012-03-09 Commissariat Energie Atomique METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION WITH ULTRA BROADBAND RADIO FREQUENCY SIGNALS.
US8169356B2 (en) * 2007-12-31 2012-05-01 Honeywell International Inc. Anti-mask motion sensor
DE102008013055A1 (en) * 2008-03-06 2009-11-12 Robert Bosch Gmbh Machine tool monitoring device
US8275343B2 (en) * 2008-03-10 2012-09-25 Qualcomm Incorporated System and method of using residual voltage from a prior operation to establish a bias voltage for a subsequent operation
US7812667B2 (en) * 2008-03-10 2010-10-12 Qualcomm Incorporated System and method of enabling a signal processing device in a relatively fast manner to process a low duty cycle signal
US8254595B2 (en) * 2008-03-25 2012-08-28 Qualcomm Incorporated System and method of companding an input signal of an energy detecting receiver
US7868689B2 (en) * 2008-04-08 2011-01-11 Qualcomm Incorporated Low power slicer-based demodulator for PPM
US8589720B2 (en) * 2008-04-15 2013-11-19 Qualcomm Incorporated Synchronizing timing mismatch by data insertion
US8473013B2 (en) * 2008-04-23 2013-06-25 Qualcomm Incorporated Multi-level duty cycling
US8483639B2 (en) 2008-05-06 2013-07-09 Qualcomm Incorporated AGC for slicer-based low power demodulator
US20090323985A1 (en) * 2008-06-30 2009-12-31 Qualcomm Incorporated System and method of controlling power consumption in response to volume control
US8375261B2 (en) 2008-07-07 2013-02-12 Qualcomm Incorporated System and method of puncturing pulses in a receiver or transmitter
US8787440B2 (en) * 2008-07-25 2014-07-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Determination of receive data values
US8165080B2 (en) 2008-08-22 2012-04-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Addressing schemes for wireless communication
US8461989B2 (en) * 2008-10-16 2013-06-11 Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc. Smart container UWB sensor system for situational awareness of intrusion alarms
KR101022369B1 (en) 2008-11-07 2011-03-22 주식회사 에스원 UWB sugnal extracting method and measuring device using the method
US8553744B2 (en) * 2009-01-06 2013-10-08 Qualcomm Incorporated Pulse arbitration for network communications
EP2384448B1 (en) * 2009-01-31 2013-12-18 Elbit Systems Land and C4I Ltd. Low energy radar system
US20100235689A1 (en) * 2009-03-16 2010-09-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Apparatus and method for employing codes for telecommunications
US8612693B2 (en) * 2009-03-19 2013-12-17 Qualcomm Incorporated Optimized transfer of packets in a resource constrained operating environment
US8514911B2 (en) * 2009-05-13 2013-08-20 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for clock drift compensation during acquisition in a wireless communication system
FR2950151B1 (en) * 2009-09-15 2011-10-21 Commissariat Energie Atomique METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LOCATING A PERSON, RECORDING MEDIUM FOR THIS METHOD
US8138918B2 (en) * 2009-09-17 2012-03-20 Raytheon Company Intrusion detection and tracking system
US9024814B2 (en) 2010-01-05 2015-05-05 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Tracking identities of persons using micro-impulse radar
US9069067B2 (en) 2010-09-17 2015-06-30 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Control of an electronic apparatus using micro-impulse radar
US8884813B2 (en) * 2010-01-05 2014-11-11 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Surveillance of stress conditions of persons using micro-impulse radar
US9019149B2 (en) 2010-01-05 2015-04-28 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Method and apparatus for measuring the motion of a person
US20110166940A1 (en) * 2010-01-05 2011-07-07 Searete Llc Micro-impulse radar detection of a human demographic and delivery of targeted media content
US20110166937A1 (en) * 2010-01-05 2011-07-07 Searete Llc Media output with micro-impulse radar feedback of physiological response
EP2572544A4 (en) * 2010-05-19 2017-01-18 Nokia Technologies Oy Physically-constrained radiomaps
US8836344B2 (en) 2010-07-27 2014-09-16 Raytheon Company Intrusion detection and tracking system
US9151863B2 (en) * 2010-08-29 2015-10-06 Goldwing Design & Construction Pty Ltd. Method and apparatus for a metal detection system
US20120116252A1 (en) * 2010-10-13 2012-05-10 The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate Systems and methods for detecting body orientation or posture
US8599018B2 (en) 2010-11-18 2013-12-03 Yael Debra Kellen Alarm system having an indicator light that is external to an enclosed space for indicating the time elapsed since an intrusion into the enclosed space and method for installing the alarm system
US8624735B2 (en) 2010-11-18 2014-01-07 Yael Debra Kellen Alarm system having an indicator light that is external to an enclosed space for indicating the specific location of an intrusion into the enclosed space and a method for installing the alarm system
US10542372B2 (en) 2011-03-15 2020-01-21 Qualcomm Incorporated User identification within a physical merchant location through the use of a wireless network
CN102131288B (en) * 2011-03-30 2013-06-19 北京交通大学 Indoor positioning method and indoor positioning system based on super resolution ultra wideband (UWB) signal broadcast delay estimation
US9151834B2 (en) 2011-04-29 2015-10-06 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Network and personal electronic devices operatively coupled to micro-impulse radars
US9103899B2 (en) 2011-04-29 2015-08-11 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Adaptive control of a personal electronic device responsive to a micro-impulse radar
US8884809B2 (en) * 2011-04-29 2014-11-11 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Personal electronic device providing enhanced user environmental awareness
US9000973B2 (en) * 2011-04-29 2015-04-07 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Personal electronic device with a micro-impulse radar
IL212674A0 (en) * 2011-05-04 2011-07-31 Yaacov Frucht System and method for detecting an intrusion
US9311793B2 (en) * 2011-10-24 2016-04-12 Andrew Lohbihler Motion and area monitoring system and method
US9383436B2 (en) 2012-01-18 2016-07-05 Tdc Acquisition Holdings, Inc. One way time of flight distance measurement
US9140772B1 (en) 2012-01-18 2015-09-22 Tdc Acquisition Holdings, Inc. Distance measuring quality factor using signal characterization
AU2013266151B2 (en) 2012-05-24 2015-11-12 Raytheon Company High power optical switch
US9632345B2 (en) 2012-05-24 2017-04-25 Raytheon Company Liquid crystal control structure, tip-tilt-focus optical phased array and high power adaptive optic
US9057782B2 (en) * 2012-08-17 2015-06-16 Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. Realization of time-domain ultra wideband ground-penetrating radar using high speed accumulation and interpolated sampling
CN102988057A (en) * 2012-12-06 2013-03-27 中国人民解放军第四军医大学 Non-contact type audio frequency life detection instrument based on ultra-wideband biological radar
US10145837B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2018-12-04 Robert Ernest Troxler Systems and methods for asphalt density and soil moisture measurements using ground penetrating radar
JP2016520808A (en) * 2013-03-15 2016-07-14 アイポジ インコーポレイテッドIposi,Inc. Indoor location using packet synchronous receiver array
US9835856B2 (en) 2013-05-24 2017-12-05 Raytheon Company Adaptive optic having meander resistors
US9383426B2 (en) * 2013-09-17 2016-07-05 Farrokh Mohamadi Real-time, two dimensional (2-D) tracking of first responders with identification inside premises
JP6273808B2 (en) * 2013-12-04 2018-02-07 沖電気工業株式会社 Control device, control system, and program
US9798000B2 (en) * 2013-12-10 2017-10-24 Intel Corporation System and method for indoor geolocation and mapping
RU2564995C1 (en) * 2014-03-11 2015-10-10 Федеральное государственное казенное военное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования "Военно-космическая академия имени А.Ф. Можайского" Министерства обороны Российской Федерации Method for passive location of mobile object
EP3130088A4 (en) * 2014-04-09 2017-11-08 CommScope Technologies LLC Hybrid distributed antenna system and motion detection security radar
US10436888B2 (en) * 2014-05-30 2019-10-08 Texas Tech University System Hybrid FMCW-interferometry radar for positioning and monitoring and methods of using same
EP3204789A1 (en) * 2014-10-09 2017-08-16 UTC Fire & Security Corporation Advanced identification techniques for security and safety systems
KR20170118061A (en) 2015-01-06 2017-10-24 알파웨이브 골프 (피티와이) 리미티드 Golf ball tracking system
RU2737058C2 (en) * 2016-05-27 2020-11-24 Рхомбус Сыстемс Гроуп, Инц. Radar tracking system for low-flying unmanned aerial vehicles and objects
KR20180016820A (en) 2016-08-08 2018-02-20 엘지전자 주식회사 Occupancy detection apparatus and control method thereof
US20180059231A1 (en) * 2016-08-12 2018-03-01 5D Robotics, Inc. Ultra-Wide Band Radar and Positional Node Integration
WO2018033961A1 (en) * 2016-08-16 2018-02-22 三菱電機株式会社 Object detection device, object detection method, and sensor device
US10816658B2 (en) 2016-09-07 2020-10-27 OmniPreSense Corporation Radar enabled weapon detection system
EP3385748A1 (en) * 2017-04-04 2018-10-10 ABB Schweiz AG Monitoring system using microwaves
EP3619642A1 (en) * 2017-05-01 2020-03-11 Sensormatic Electronics, LLC Space management monitoring and reporting using video analytics
US20180313950A1 (en) * 2017-05-01 2018-11-01 Farrokh Mohamadi CNN-Based Remote Locating and Tracking of Individuals Through Walls
US20190114883A1 (en) * 2017-10-12 2019-04-18 Honeywell International Inc. Systems and methods for providing a plurality of alarm levels for a motion detector monitoring a region
US20180074200A1 (en) * 2017-11-21 2018-03-15 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Systems and methods for determining the velocity of lidar points
KR102601580B1 (en) 2017-12-20 2023-11-13 삼성전자주식회사 Lighting system, lighting device and lighting control method using ultra wide band sensor
EP3525002A1 (en) 2018-02-12 2019-08-14 Imec Methods for the determination of a boundary of a space of interest using radar sensors
US10438464B1 (en) 2018-06-06 2019-10-08 Ademco Inc. Systems and methods for determining and verifying a presence of an object or an intruder in a secured area
US20210141082A1 (en) * 2018-07-02 2021-05-13 Vayyar Imaging Ltd. System and methods for environment mapping
EP3821271A2 (en) * 2018-07-13 2021-05-19 Carrier Corporation System and method for presence detection using an fmcw radar
EP3841358A4 (en) * 2018-08-21 2022-06-08 Moonshot Health Inc. Systems and methods for mapping a given environment
WO2020092413A1 (en) * 2018-10-29 2020-05-07 Metrom Rail, Llc Methods and systems for ultra-wideband (uwb) based platform intrusion detection
DE102018219731A1 (en) * 2018-11-16 2020-05-20 Robert Bosch Gmbh System and method for determining an occupancy status of at least one parking space of a parking space and a parking space with such a system
US11074794B2 (en) 2018-11-30 2021-07-27 Ademco Inc. Systems and methods for activating and deactivating controlled devices in a secured area
US10996325B2 (en) 2018-11-30 2021-05-04 Ademco Inc. Systems and methods for adjusting a signal broadcast pattern of an intrusion detector
KR102269851B1 (en) * 2019-01-31 2021-06-28 엘지전자 주식회사 Moving robot and contorlling method thereof
US10762773B1 (en) 2019-08-19 2020-09-01 Ademco Inc. Systems and methods for building and using a false alarm predicting model to determine whether to alert a user and/or relevant authorities about an alarm signal from a security system
EP3783583B1 (en) 2019-08-23 2023-09-27 UTC Fire & Security EMEA BVBA Method and apparatus for defining a detection zone
US11483123B2 (en) * 2019-09-13 2022-10-25 Nokomis, Inc Direct conversion receiver using coherent integration
CN111693961B (en) * 2020-06-15 2023-05-16 哈尔滨工业大学 CFAR detector based on KL divergence unit screening
CN111915853B (en) * 2020-06-15 2022-02-11 西安交通大学 Energy storage station safety situation assessment and early warning system and method with linkage characteristic
CN116964649A (en) 2020-12-16 2023-10-27 新鲜混合物有限公司 Intelligent inventory management system for a dispensing and in-cup mixing beverage platform

Family Cites Families (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4083049A (en) * 1971-07-28 1978-04-04 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Moving target radar
IT1200370B (en) * 1981-03-25 1989-01-18 Goldstein Pinchas PASSIVE FINISHING OPTICAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT AND STABILIZED REFLECTOR COMPLEX USED IN IT
US4622540A (en) * 1984-03-05 1986-11-11 American District Telegraph Company Security system status reporting
US4641317A (en) 1984-12-03 1987-02-03 Charles A. Phillips Spread spectrum radio transmission system
US4813057A (en) 1984-12-03 1989-03-14 Charles A. Phillips Time domain radio transmission system
US4743906A (en) 1984-12-03 1988-05-10 Charles A. Phillips Time domain radio transmission system
US5363108A (en) 1984-12-03 1994-11-08 Charles A. Phillips Time domain radio transmission system
US4907001A (en) 1987-08-21 1990-03-06 Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. Extraction of radar targets from clutter
US5265121A (en) * 1989-10-17 1993-11-23 Juanita H. Stewart Spread spectrum coherent processor
US5057846A (en) 1990-03-26 1991-10-15 Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. Efficient operation of probing radar in absorbing media
US5134408A (en) 1991-01-30 1992-07-28 Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. Detection of radar signals with large radar signatures
US5148174A (en) 1991-02-13 1992-09-15 Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. Selective reception of carrier-free radar signals with large relative bandwidth
BE1005991A3 (en) * 1992-06-25 1994-04-12 Ber Sa Device and method for detection and protection.
US5457394A (en) 1993-04-12 1995-10-10 The Regents Of The University Of California Impulse radar studfinder
US5661490A (en) 1993-04-12 1997-08-26 The Regents Of The University Of California Time-of-flight radio location system
US5767953A (en) 1993-04-12 1998-06-16 The Regents Of The University Of California Light beam range finder
US5510800A (en) 1993-04-12 1996-04-23 The Regents Of The University Of California Time-of-flight radio location system
US5519400A (en) 1993-04-12 1996-05-21 The Regents Of The University Of California Phase coded, micro-power impulse radar motion sensor
US5757320A (en) 1993-04-12 1998-05-26 The Regents Of The University Of California Short range, ultra-wideband radar with high resolution swept range gate
US5361070B1 (en) 1993-04-12 2000-05-16 Univ California Ultra-wideband radar motion sensor
US5774091A (en) 1993-04-12 1998-06-30 The Regents Of The University Of California Short range micro-power impulse radar with high resolution swept range gate with damped transmit and receive cavities
US5465094A (en) 1994-01-14 1995-11-07 The Regents Of The University Of California Two terminal micropower radar sensor
US5446461A (en) * 1994-04-28 1995-08-29 Hughes Missile Systems Company Concrete penetrating imaging radar
US5573012A (en) 1994-08-09 1996-11-12 The Regents Of The University Of California Body monitoring and imaging apparatus and method
US5589838A (en) 1994-09-06 1996-12-31 The Regents Of The University Of California Short range radio locator system
US5576627A (en) 1994-09-06 1996-11-19 The Regents Of The University Of California Narrow field electromagnetic sensor system and method
US5521600A (en) 1994-09-06 1996-05-28 The Regents Of The University Of California Range-gated field disturbance sensor with range-sensitivity compensation
US5687169A (en) 1995-04-27 1997-11-11 Time Domain Systems, Inc. Full duplex ultrawide-band communication system and method
US5832035A (en) 1994-09-20 1998-11-03 Time Domain Corporation Fast locking mechanism for channelized ultrawide-band communications
US5677927A (en) 1994-09-20 1997-10-14 Pulson Communications Corporation Ultrawide-band communication system and method
US5668555A (en) * 1995-09-01 1997-09-16 Starr; Jon E. Imaging system and apparatus
DE19612579A1 (en) * 1996-03-29 1997-10-02 Honeywell Ag Danger space control monitoring arrangement
US6026125A (en) * 1997-05-16 2000-02-15 Multispectral Solutions, Inc. Waveform adaptive ultra-wideband transmitter
US6067040A (en) * 1997-05-30 2000-05-23 The Whitaker Corporation Low cost-high resolution radar for commercial and industrial applications
EP0995127B1 (en) * 1997-07-18 2002-11-27 Kohler Co. Radar devices for low power applications and bathroom fixtures
US6177903B1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2001-01-23 Time Domain Corporation System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US6218979B1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2001-04-17 Time Domain Corporation Wide area time domain radar array
US6492904B2 (en) * 1999-09-27 2002-12-10 Time Domain Corporation Method and system for coordinating timing among ultrawideband transmissions
WO2002023218A2 (en) * 2000-09-14 2002-03-21 Time Domain Corporation System and method for detecting an intruder using impulse radio technology
US6667724B2 (en) * 2001-02-26 2003-12-23 Time Domain Corporation Impulse radar antenna array and method
US6661342B2 (en) * 2001-06-04 2003-12-09 Time Domain Corporation System and method for using impulse radio technology to track the movement of athletes and to enable secure communications between the athletes and their teammates, fans or coaches
US7256727B2 (en) * 2005-01-07 2007-08-14 Time Domain Corporation System and method for radiating RF waveforms using discontinues associated with a utility transmission line

Cited By (51)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030174048A1 (en) * 1998-12-11 2003-09-18 Mccorkle John W. Method and system for performing distance measuring and direction finding using ultrawide bandwidth transmissions
US7346120B2 (en) * 1998-12-11 2008-03-18 Freescale Semiconductor Inc. Method and system for performing distance measuring and direction finding using ultrawide bandwidth transmissions
US8451936B2 (en) 1998-12-11 2013-05-28 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. Method and system for performing distance measuring and direction finding using ultrawide bandwidth transmissions
US20070182618A1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2007-08-09 Time Domain System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US7358888B2 (en) * 1999-06-14 2008-04-15 Time Domain System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US20080165046A1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2008-07-10 Time Domain Corporation System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US6710736B2 (en) * 1999-06-14 2004-03-23 Time Domain Corporation System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US20080151967A1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2008-06-26 Time Domain Corporation Time transfer using ultra wideband signals
US7873099B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2011-01-18 Time Domain Corporation Time transfer using ultra wideband signals
US20080100498A1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2008-05-01 Time Domain Corporation System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US7417581B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2008-08-26 Time Domain Corporation System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US7592944B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2009-09-22 Time Domain Corporation System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US6400307B2 (en) * 1999-06-14 2002-06-04 Time Domain Corporation System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US6573857B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2003-06-03 Time Domain Corporation System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US6535159B1 (en) * 2000-12-01 2003-03-18 Omron Corporation Immersion object detection system and method
EP1365259A4 (en) * 2002-03-01 2008-11-05 Hitachi Ltd Detecting system
EP1365259A1 (en) * 2002-03-01 2003-11-26 Hitachi, Ltd. detecting system
US7084806B2 (en) 2002-08-27 2006-08-01 Omron Corporation Intruding object detecting apparatus, and setting apparatus, setting process and setting confirmation process therefor
EP1394564A3 (en) * 2002-08-27 2005-05-18 Omron Corporation Intruding object detecting apparatus with variable detection region and calibration process
US20040082342A1 (en) * 2002-08-27 2004-04-29 Yoichi Toguchi Intruding object detecting apparatus, and setting apparatus, setting process and setting confirmation process therefor
EP1394564A2 (en) 2002-08-27 2004-03-03 Omron Corporation Intruding object detecting apparatus with variable detection region and calibration process
US20050167588A1 (en) * 2003-12-30 2005-08-04 The Mitre Corporation Techniques for building-scale electrostatic tomography
US7330032B2 (en) 2003-12-30 2008-02-12 The Mitre Corporation Techniques for building-scale electrostatic tomography
US20070133351A1 (en) * 2005-12-12 2007-06-14 Taylor Gordon E Human target acquisition system and method
US7567200B1 (en) 2006-04-27 2009-07-28 Josef Osterweil Method and apparatus for body position monitor and fall detect ion using radar
US7916066B1 (en) * 2006-04-27 2011-03-29 Josef Osterweil Method and apparatus for a body position monitor and fall detector using radar
WO2008001092A2 (en) * 2006-06-28 2008-01-03 Cambridge Consultants Limited Radar for through wall detection
WO2008001092A3 (en) * 2006-06-28 2008-05-02 Cambridge Consultants Radar for through wall detection
US20090135045A1 (en) * 2007-11-28 2009-05-28 Camero-Tech Ltd. Through-the-obstacle radar system and method of operation
US8098186B2 (en) 2007-11-28 2012-01-17 Camero-Tech Ltd. Through-the-obstacle radar system and method of operation
US20100134285A1 (en) * 2008-12-02 2010-06-03 Honeywell International Inc. Method of sensor data fusion for physical security systems
US9633537B2 (en) 2010-07-27 2017-04-25 Rite-Hite Holding Corporation Methods and apparatus to detect and warn proximate entities of interest
US20150158428A1 (en) * 2010-07-27 2015-06-11 Ryan P. Beggs Methods and apparatus to detect and warn proximate entities of interest
US9672713B2 (en) * 2010-07-27 2017-06-06 Rite-Hite Holding Corporation Methods and apparatus to detect and warn proximate entities of interest
US9542824B2 (en) 2010-07-27 2017-01-10 Rite-Hite Holding Corporation Methods and apparatus to detect and warn proximate entities of interest
US9547969B2 (en) 2010-07-27 2017-01-17 Right-Hite Holding Corporation Methods and apparatus to detect and warn proximate entities of interest
US9607496B2 (en) 2010-07-27 2017-03-28 Rite-Hite Holding Corporation Methods and apparatus to detect and warn proximate entities of interest
US11719800B2 (en) 2011-02-21 2023-08-08 TransRobotics, Inc. System and method for sensing distance and/or movement
US20140247695A1 (en) * 2011-06-15 2014-09-04 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Method for robust and fast presence detection with a sensor
US11717189B2 (en) 2012-10-05 2023-08-08 TransRobotics, Inc. Systems and methods for high resolution distance sensing and applications
US9261592B2 (en) * 2014-01-13 2016-02-16 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Method and system for through-the-wall imaging using compressive sensing and MIMO antenna arrays
US20150198713A1 (en) * 2014-01-13 2015-07-16 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Method and System for Through-the-Wall Imaging using Compressive Sensing and MIMO Antenna Arrays
US9672710B2 (en) * 2015-02-26 2017-06-06 International Business Machines Corporation Item movement tracking with three-dimensional (3D) proximity exclusions
US10796545B2 (en) 2015-02-26 2020-10-06 International Business Machines Corporation Item movement tracking with three-dimensional (3D) proximity exclusions
US9643572B1 (en) * 2015-10-29 2017-05-09 Hyundai Motor Company Method and apparatus for detecting intrusion into large vehicle
EP3599482A1 (en) * 2018-07-24 2020-01-29 Nxp B.V. Methods and apparatuses involving vehicle tow-away detection
CN110780294A (en) * 2018-07-24 2020-02-11 恩智浦有限公司 Method and apparatus relating to vehicle tow detection
CN109298417A (en) * 2018-09-30 2019-02-01 湖南华诺星空电子技术有限公司 A kind of constructure inner structure detection method and device based on Radar Signal Processing
US11703593B2 (en) 2019-04-04 2023-07-18 TransRobotics, Inc. Technologies for acting based on object tracking
US20210223386A1 (en) * 2020-01-17 2021-07-22 Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd. Method and device for acquiring ar or vr information, mobile terminal, and storage medium
US11656351B2 (en) * 2020-01-17 2023-05-23 Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd. Method and mobile device for acquiring AR or VR information by averaging pixel values

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US6573857B2 (en) 2003-06-03
US20040027270A1 (en) 2004-02-12
US20020158790A1 (en) 2002-10-31
US6400307B2 (en) 2002-06-04
US20070182618A1 (en) 2007-08-09
US7417581B2 (en) 2008-08-26
US6710736B2 (en) 2004-03-23
US20080100498A1 (en) 2008-05-01
WO2001001168A2 (en) 2001-01-04
US7358888B2 (en) 2008-04-15
US6177903B1 (en) 2001-01-23
WO2001001168A3 (en) 2001-08-09
AU7981700A (en) 2001-01-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6177903B1 (en) System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US7592944B2 (en) System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array
US6218979B1 (en) Wide area time domain radar array
US7463182B1 (en) Radar apparatus
US6518915B2 (en) Impulse radar security system
US8120524B2 (en) Motion detection systems using CW radar in combination with additional sensors
US8314732B2 (en) Adaptive radar
US7342493B2 (en) Motion detector
EP1714167B1 (en) Method and apparatus for through-the-wall motion detection utilizing cw radar
US6552677B2 (en) Method of envelope detection and image generation
JP4987481B2 (en) Determining location information
JP2009539272A (en) Ultra-wideband radar sensor and network
US20160178741A1 (en) Bidirectional bistatic radar perimeter intrusion detection system
KR101507238B1 (en) Radar apparatus
CN107293077B (en) Perimeter intrusion detecting device and method based on orthogonal CPPM signal
EP1288879B1 (en) Intrusion detection system using microwave barrier
KR20190087906A (en) System for reducing sensing error of radar for Frequency Modulation Continuous Wave and method thereof
Ruser et al. A low-cost ultrasonic-microwave multisensor for robust sensing of velocity and range
RU2726012C1 (en) Radio-beam device with volumetric detection zone for perimeters and rooms
CN115201749A (en) Method and system for detecting objects
Barnes Covert range gated wall penetrating motion sensor provides benefits for surveillance and forced entries

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAT HOLDER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS, ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: LTOS); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

AS Assignment

Owner name: TDC ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC., ALABAMA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TIME DOMAIN CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:025983/0646

Effective date: 20101231

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: TIME DOMAIN CORPORATION, ALABAMA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FULLERTON, LARRY W;RICHARDS, JAMES L;SIGNING DATES FROM 19990813 TO 19990816;REEL/FRAME:045104/0916

AS Assignment

Owner name: HUMATICS CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TDC ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:045318/0549

Effective date: 20180122